World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
11202
World Ranking
4349
National Ranking
379

Neil Upton publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Upton sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 143 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Neil Upton D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Upton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Orexin A activates locus coeruleus cell firing and increases arousal in the rat

    J.J. Hagan;R.A. Leslie;S. Patel;M.L. Evans

  • SB 242084, a selective and brain penetrant 5-HT2C receptor antagonist.

    G.A. Kennett;M.D. Wood;F. Bright;B. Trail

  • The novel brain neuropeptide, orexin-A, modulates the sleep-wake cycle of rats.

    David C. Piper;Neil Upton;Martin I. Smith;A. Jackie Hunter

  • GSK189254, a Novel H3 Receptor Antagonist That Binds to Histamine H3 Receptors in Alzheimer's Disease Brain and Improves Cognitive Performance in Preclinical Models

    Andrew D. Medhurst;Alan R. Atkins;Isabel J. Beresford;Kim Brackenborough

  • Characterization of SB‐269970‐A, a selective 5‐HT7 receptor antagonist

    Jim J Hagan;Gary W Price;Phillip Jeffrey;Nigel J Deeks

  • Epileptogenesis and enhanced prepulse inhibition in GABA(B1)-deficient mice.

    Haydn M. Prosser;Catherine H. Gill;Warren D. Hirst;Evelyn Grau

  • SB-399885 is a potent, selective 5-HT6 receptor antagonist with cognitive enhancing properties in aged rat water maze and novel object recognition models.

    Warren D. Hirst;Tania O. Stean;Derek C. Rogers;David Sunter

  • 5-HT6 receptor antagonists as novel cognitive enhancing agents for Alzheimer's disease.

    Neil Upton;Tsu Tshen Chuang;Ann J. Hunter;David J. Virley

  • SB-334867, a selective orexin-1 receptor antagonist, enhances behavioural satiety and blocks the hyperphagic effect of orexin-A in rats

    R. J. Rodgers;J. C. G. Halford;R. L. Nunes de Souza;A. L. Canto de Souza

  • Characterization of SB-271046 : A potent, selective and orally active 5-HT6 receptor antagonist

    Carol Routledge;Steven M Bromidge;Stephen F Moss;Gary W Price

  • BACE1 (β-secretase) transgenic and knockout mice: identification of neurochemical deficits and behavioral changes

    Steve M Harrison;Alex J Harper;Julie Hawkins;Graham Duddy

  • Non-cognitive behaviours in an APP/PS1 transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease

    Perdita L. Pugh;Jill C. Richardson;Simon T. Bate;Neil Upton

  • The 5-HT 6 Receptor Antagonist SB-271046 Reverses Scopolamine-Disrupted Consolidation of a Passive Avoidance Task and Ameliorates Spatial Task Deficits in Aged Rats

    Andrew G Foley;Keith J Murphy;Warren D Hirst;Helen C Gallagher

  • A simultaneous ERP/fMRI investigation of the P300 aging effect

    Redmond G. O'Connell;Joshua H. Balsters;Sophia M. Kilcullen;William Campbell

  • The PPARγ agonist pioglitazone is effective in the MPTP mouse model of Parkinson's disease through inhibition of monoamine oxidase B

    L P Quinn;B Crook;M E Hows;M Vidgeon-Hart

  • GABAB receptor isoforms GBR1a and GBR1b, appear to be associated with pre- and post-synaptic elements respectively in rat and human cerebellum

    Andrew Billinton;Neil Upton;Norman G Bowery

  • (R)-3,N-dimethyl-N-[1-methyl-3-(4-methyl-piperidin-1-yl) propyl]benzenesulfonamide: the first selective 5-HT7 receptor antagonist.

    Forbes It;Dabbs S;Duckworth Dm;Jennings Aj

  • Effects of centrally administered orexin-B and orexin-A: a role for orexin-1 receptors in orexin-B-induced hyperactivity.

    D N Jones;J Gartlon;F Parker;S G Taylor

  • Evidence that orexin-A-evoked grooming in the rat is mediated by orexin-1 (OX1) receptors, with downstream 5-HT2C receptor involvement.

    Mark S. Duxon;Jennifer Stretton;Kathryn Starr;Declan N.C. Jones

  • Circadian and dark-pulse activation of orexin/hypocretin neurons

    Oliver J Marston;Rhîannan H Williams;Maria M Canal;Rayna E Samuels

  • Pittsburgh compound B (11C-PIB) and fluorodeoxyglucose (18 F-FDG) PET in patients with Alzheimer disease, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy controls.

    D.P. Devanand;Arthur Mikhno;Gregory H. Pelton;Katrina Cuasay

  • Evidence implicating a role for orexin-1 receptor modulation of paradoxical sleep in the rat

    M.I Smith;D.C Piper;M.S Duxon;N Upton

Frequent Co-Authors

Jim J. Hagan
Jim J. Hagan GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
Jill C. Richardson
Jill C. Richardson MSD (United Kingdom)
Derek L. G. Hill
Derek L. G. Hill Panoramic Digital Health
Daniel Rueckert
Daniel Rueckert Technical University of Munich
Roger N. Gunn
Roger N. Gunn Imperial College London
Joshua H. Balsters
Joshua H. Balsters Royal Holloway University of London
Ian H. Robertson
Ian H. Robertson Trinity College Dublin
Menelas N. Pangalos
Menelas N. Pangalos AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Redmond G O'Connell
Redmond G O'Connell Trinity College Dublin
R.J. Rodgers
R.J. Rodgers University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in Neuroscience but looking for a flexible study option? Many universities in the US now offer accelerated online programs that let you complete your degree faster without compromising on quality. These online degrees are ideal for working adults or anyone needing to balance education with life’s other commitments.

Neuroscience graduates often pursue diverse roles in healthcare, research, pharmaceuticals, or technology. Exploring the best bachelor's degrees can help you identify related majors—such as biomedical engineering or computer science—that also lead to strong careers. In fact, many of the which degrees make the most money lists include STEM-focused fields with connections to neuroscience.

Cost is an important factor when choosing an online degree. Be sure to review online colleges that accept federal financial aid (FAFSA) to help keep your education affordable. With the right online program and focus, you can unlock exciting career opportunities in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Neil Upton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles