World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 168 558 508 67 61 1243 127886

Peter J. Goadsby publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter J. Goadsby between 1982 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter J. Goadsby published across 45 years, from 1982 to 2026, averaging 30.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 120 publications in 2002. 46 of the 1,363 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 120. Peak 120 publications in 2002. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 17 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 18 publications 1999: 27 publications 2000: 20 publications 2001: 34 publications 2002: 120 publications 2003: 48 publications 2004: 50 publications 2005: 40 publications 2006: 45 publications 2007: 33 publications 2008: 51 publications 2009: 39 publications 2010: 40 publications 2011: 35 publications 2012: 36 publications 2013: 49 publications 2014: 62 publications 2015: 39 publications 2016: 35 publications 2017: 43 publications 2018: 62 publications 2019: 46 publications 2020: 52 publications 2021: 57 publications 2022: 41 publications 2023: 51 publications 2024: 40 publications 2025: 44 publications 2026: 2 publications
1982 2026

1,363 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter J. Goadsby: publications per year, 1982 to 2026
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 2
1984 2
1985 5
1986 3
1987 3
1988 4
1989 8
1990 6
1991 7
1992 6
1993 10
1994 17
1995 2
1996 11
1997 17
1998 18
1999 27
2000 20
2001 34
2002 120
2003 48
2004 50
2005 40
2006 45
2007 33
2008 51
2009 39
2010 40
2011 35
2012 36
2013 49
2014 62
2015 39
2016 35
2017 43
2018 62
2019 46
2020 52
2021 57
2022 41
2023 51
2024 40
2025 44
2026 2
Total 1,363
Download as CSV

Peter J. Goadsby publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Goadsby sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,241–1,260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,243 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36 1,243
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter J. Goadsby D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Goadsby sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 168–169 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 168 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42 168
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Medicine in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 1994 - Gottschalk Medal, Australian Academy of Science
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Peter J. Goadsby is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant emphasis on psychiatry and mental health, pathology and forensic medicine, physiology, neurology, and sensory systems.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
  • Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Neurological Disorders and Treatments

Peter J. Goadsby has contributed to numerous recent papers, including:

  • "Migraine," 2022, published in Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • "Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine," 2020, published in Neurology
  • "Migraine: disease characterisation, biomarkers, and precision medicine," 2021, published in The Lancet
  • "Oral rimegepant for preventive treatment of migraine: a phase 2/3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial," 2020, published in The Lancet
  • "Atogepant for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine," 2021, published in New England Journal of Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Goadsby have included:

  • David W. Dodick (44 co-authored works)
  • Richard B. Lipton (42 co-authored works)
  • Nazia Karsan (30 co-authored works)
  • Messoud Ashina (23 co-authored works)
  • Joel M. Trugman (23 co-authored works)

The scientist has published frequently in venues such as:

  • Neurology (46 publications)
  • Cephalalgia (37 publications)
  • Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain (25 publications)
  • The Journal of Headache and Pain (14 publications)
  • European Journal of Neurology (11 publications)

Among awards received are the Gottschalk Medal from the Australian Academy of Science in 1994 and fellowship status in The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version)

    Jes Olesen;André Bes;Robert Kunkel;James W. Lance

  • The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition

    Jes Olesen;Peter Goadsby;Tim Steiner

  • A Report on the Journal 2004

    Peter J Goadsby

  • Migraine--current understanding and treatment.

    Peter J. Goadsby;Richard B. Lipton;Michel D. Ferrari

  • Pathophysiology of Migraine: A Disorder of Sensory Processing

    Peter J. Goadsby;Philip R. Holland;Margarida Martins-Oliveira;Jan Hoffmann

  • VASOACTIVE PEPTIDE RELEASE IN THE EXTRACEREBRAL CIRCULATION OF HUMANS DURING MIGRAINE HEADACHE

    P. J. Goadsby;L. Edvinsson;R. Ekman

  • Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the acute treatment of migraine.

    Jes Olesen;Hans-Christoph Diener;Ingo W. Husstedt;Peter J. Goadsby

  • Hypothalamic activation in cluster headache attacks

    Arne May;Anish Bahra;Christian Büchel;Richard Sj Frackowiak

  • The trigeminovascular system and migraine: Studies characterizing cerebrovascular and neuropeptide changes seen in humans and cats

    Peter J. Goadsby;Lars Edvinsson

  • Mechanism and management of headache

    JW Lance;PJ Goadsby

  • Oral triptans (serotonin 5-HT1B/1D agonists) in acute migraine treatment: a meta-analysis of 53 trials

    Michel D Ferrari;Krista I Roon;Richard B Lipton;Peter J Goadsby

  • New Appendix Criteria Open for a Broader Concept of Chronic Migraine

    J. Olesen;M -G Bousser;H -C Diener;D. Dodick

  • Release of vasoactive peptides in the extracerebral circulation of humans and the cat during activation of the trigeminovascular system

    P. J. Goadsby;L. Edvinsson;R. Ekman

  • EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine--revised report of an EFNS task force.

    S. Evers;J. Áfra;A. Frese;P. J. Goadsby;P. J. Goadsby

  • A review of paroxysmal hemicranias, SUNCT syndrome and other short-lasting headaches with autonomic feature, including new cases.

    Peter J. Goadsby;Richard B. Lipton

  • Guidelines for Controlled Trials of Drugs in Migraine: Second Edition:

    P Tfelt-Hansen;G Block;C Dahlöf

  • A Controlled Trial of Erenumab for Episodic Migraine.

    Peter J. Goadsby;Uwe Reuter;Yngve Hallström;Gregor Broessner

  • Fremanezumab for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine

    Stephen D. Silberstein;David W. Dodick;Marcelo E. Bigal;Paul P. Yeung

  • Human in vivo evidence for trigeminovascular activation in cluster headache Neuropeptide changes and effects of acute attacks therapies

    Peter J. Goadsby;Lars Edvinsson

  • Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN4096BSfor the acute treatment of migraine

    J Olesen;H Diener;IW Husstedt;PJ Goadsby

Frequent Co-Authors

Guy M. McKhann
Guy M. McKhann Johns Hopkins University
Richard B. Lipton
Richard B. Lipton Albert Einstein College of Medicine
David W. Dodick
David W. Dodick Mayo Clinic
Stephen D. Silberstein
Stephen D. Silberstein Thomas Jefferson University
Philip R. Holland
Philip R. Holland King's College London
Justin C. McArthur
Justin C. McArthur Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Lars Edvinsson
Lars Edvinsson Lund University
Till Sprenger
Till Sprenger University Hospital of Basel
Holger Kaube
Holger Kaube University of Freiburg
Michel D. Ferrari
Michel D. Ferrari Leiden University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring a future in Medicine, there are many flexible online degree options and alternative career pathways in healthcare. For those interested in advanced research or nursing leadership, phd nursing education online programs provide a way to earn a terminal degree while balancing work and life commitments.

For registered nurses aiming to expand their qualifications, enrolling in one of the cheapest online rn to bsn programs can be a cost-effective route to career advancement. Similarly, those from non-nursing backgrounds looking for a fast-track entry into nursing may benefit from direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online, helping accelerate entry into the profession.

If you’re seeking schools with more accessible admissions, discovering what is the easiest nursing school to get into can help you find the best opportunities suited to your academic profile. These pathways allow for greater flexibility and open more doors for aspiring medical and healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Goadsby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles