World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
120207
World Ranking
6868
National Ranking
197

Lyn March publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lyn March sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 512 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lyn March D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lyn March sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Disease
  • Surgery

Nuclear physics, Particle physics, Large Hadron Collider, Physical therapy and Atlas detector are his primary areas of study. As a part of the same scientific family, Lyn March mostly works in the field of Nuclear physics, focusing on Boson and, on occasion, Perturbative QCD. His Particle physics research includes themes of Atlas and Lepton.

Lyn March combines subjects such as Standard Model, Hadron, Invariant mass and HERA with his study of Large Hadron Collider. His research integrates issues of Osteoarthritis, Severity of illness, Epidemiology and Neck pain in his study of Physical therapy. His Years of potential life lost research focuses on Non-communicable disease and how it connects with Gerontology.

His most cited work include:

  • Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (8830 citations)
  • A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (7776 citations)
  • Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 (6156 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Lyn March focuses on Particle physics, Nuclear physics, Large Hadron Collider, Atlas detector and Physical therapy. His research combines Lepton and Particle physics. Lyn March works mostly in the field of Nuclear physics, limiting it down to concerns involving Atlas and, occasionally, Luminosity.

His studies in Large Hadron Collider integrate themes in fields like Standard Model, Quantum chromodynamics, Branching fraction and Quark. The Atlas detector study combines topics in areas such as Transverse momentum, Proton and Photon. His work carried out in the field of Physical therapy brings together such families of science as Osteoarthritis and Internal medicine, Epidemiology, Rheumatoid arthritis, Rheumatology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Particle physics (39.54%)
  • Nuclear physics (34.06%)
  • Large Hadron Collider (26.16%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Internal medicine (20.07%)
  • Rheumatology (13.75%)
  • Physical therapy (23.60%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Internal medicine, Rheumatology, Physical therapy, Osteoarthritis and Inflammatory arthritis. In the subject of general Internal medicine, his work in Cohort, Proportional hazards model and Overweight is often linked to Special Interest Group, thereby combining diverse domains of study. The various areas that Lyn March examines in his Cohort study include Body mass index and Comorbidity.

His Rheumatology research includes elements of Clinical trial, Psoriatic arthritis, Rheumatoid arthritis, Adverse effect and Family medicine. His Physical therapy study which covers Randomized controlled trial that intersects with Observational study. His Osteoarthritis study incorporates themes from Dentistry, Cartilage, Knee Joint and Zoledronic acid.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (2415 citations)
  • The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (2415 citations)
  • Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 (1628 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Disease
  • Surgery

His primary scientific interests are in Internal medicine, Rheumatology, Physical therapy, Rheumatoid arthritis and Psoriatic arthritis. His Rheumatology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Orthopedic surgery, Systematic review and Search terms. As part of one scientific family, he deals mainly with the area of Orthopedic surgery, narrowing it down to issues related to the Cost of illness, and often Global health.

His Global health course of study focuses on Weight loss and Gerontology. His Physical therapy study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Osteoarthritis, Rating scale, Patient participation and Quality of life. His study brings together the fields of Epidemiology and Rheumatoid arthritis.

Best Publications

  • Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Rafael Lozano;Mohsen Naghavi;Kyle Foreman;Stephen Lim

  • Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Christopher J.L. Murray;Theo Vos;Rafael Lozano;Mohsen Naghavi

  • A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Stephen S. Lim;Theo Vos;Abraham D. Flaxman;Goodarz Danaei

  • Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Theo Vos;Abraham D. Flaxman;Mohsen Naghavi;Rafael Lozano

  • Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

    Theo Vos;Ryan M. Barber;Brad Bell;Amelia Bertozzi-Villa

  • Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

    Simon I Hay;Amanuel Alemu Abajobir;Kalkidan Hassen Abate;Cristiana Abbafati

  • The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study

    Marita Cross;Emma Smith;Damian G Hoy;Sandra Nolte

  • A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain

    Damian Hoy;Christopher Bain;Gail Williams;Lyn March

  • The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study

    Damian Hoy;Lyn March;Peter Brooks;Fiona Blyth

  • Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement

    Damian Hoy;Peter G Brooks;Anthony Woolf;Fiona Blyth

  • Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016

    Simon I. Hay;Amanuel Alemu Abajobir;Kalkidan Hassen Abate;Cristiana Abbafati

  • Common values in assessing health outcomes from disease and injury: disability weights measurement study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

    Joshua A. Salomon;Theo Vos;Daniel R. Hogan;Michael Gagnon

  • Global, regional and national burden of osteoarthritis 1990-2017: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017

    Saeid Safiri;Ali Asghar Kolahi;Damian Hoy;Emma Smith

  • Chronic pain in Australia: a prevalence study

    Fiona M. Blyth;Lyn M. March;Alan J.M. Brnabic;Louisa R. Jorm

  • The global burden of rheumatoid arthritis: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study

    Marita Cross;Emma Smith;Damian G Hoy;Loreto Carmona

  • Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

    Aimin Wu;Lyn March;Lyn March;Xuanqi Zheng;Jinfeng Huang

  • Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0

    Maarten Boers;John R. Kirwan;George Wells;Dorcas Beaton

  • The global burden of neck pain

    Damian Hoy;Lyn March;Anthony Woolf;Fiona Blyth

  • Musculoskeletal Health Conditions Represent a Global Threat to Healthy Aging: A Report for the 2015 World Health Organization World Report on Ageing and Health

    Andrew M. Briggs;Marita J. Cross;Damian G. Hoy;Lídia Sànchez-Riera

  • Common values in assessing health outcomes from disease and injury: Disability weights measurement study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    J.A. Salomon;T. Vos;D.R. Hogan;M. Gagnon

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Brooks
Peter Brooks University of Melbourne
Rachelle Buchbinder
Rachelle Buchbinder Monash University
Philip N. Sambrook
Philip N. Sambrook University of Sydney
Anthony D. Woolf
Anthony D. Woolf Royal Cornwall Hospital
Ian D. Cameron
Ian D. Cameron University of Sydney
Graeme Jones
Graeme Jones University of Tasmania
Peter Tugwell
Peter Tugwell University of Ottawa
Fiona M. Blyth
Fiona M. Blyth University of Sydney
Flavia M. Cicuttini
Flavia M. Cicuttini Monash University
Robin Christensen
Robin Christensen University of Southern Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're exploring a career in Medicine in the USA, it's worth considering related online degree options that offer flexible learning and diverse career opportunities. An online healthcare administration degree prepares you for leadership and management roles in hospitals and health organizations, focusing on essential skills for running efficient healthcare systems.

For registered nurses aiming to advance, there are specialized adn to fnp bridge programs. These programs fast-track your transition to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner, allowing you to build clinical expertise and expand your scope of practice."

If you're passionate about wellness and preventive care, an online degree in nutrition provides the scientific foundation to help others make healthier choices and live better lives. This pathway opens doors in community health, counseling, and research roles.

To take your healthcare leadership journey further, consider one of the top online mha programs that are cahme accredited. CAHME accreditation ensures quality education for aspiring healthcare executives looking to influence policy and organizational strategy within the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Lyn March

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles