World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip N. Sambrook

Philip N. Sambrook

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
36266
World Ranking
8904
National Ranking
267

Philip N. Sambrook publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip N. Sambrook sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 341 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Philip N. Sambrook D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip N. Sambrook sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip N. Sambrook was affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. During their career, they contributed to the academic community through research and scholarship connected to this institution.

No specific records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues are available for Philip N. Sambrook. Likewise, there are no listed book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or main research topics documented in the accessible data.

There is also no information on awards or honors associated with this scientist. The available data confirms that Philip N. Sambrook is deceased.

Best Publications

  • Prediction of Bone-Density from Vitamin-D Receptor Alleles

    Nigel A. Morrison;Jian Cheng Qi;Akifumi Tokita;Paul J. Kelly

  • Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study

    Tuan V Nguyen;Diane Schneider;Philip N Sambrook

  • Osteoporosis: trends in epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment

    P. Sambrook;C. Cooper

  • Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture

    Karol Estrada;Unnur Styrkarsdottir;Evangelos Evangelou;Yi-Hsiang Hsu

  • Prediction of osteoporotic fractures by postural instability and bone density.

    Tuan Nguyen;P. Sambrook;P. Kelly;G. Jones

  • Genetic influences on cervical and lumbar disc degeneration: A magnetic resonance imaging study in twins

    P. N. Sambrook;A. J. MacGregor;T. D. Spector

  • Prevention of corticosteroid osteoporosis. A comparison of calcium, calcitriol, and calcitonin.

    Philip Sambrook;Joan Birmingham;Paul Kelly;Susan Kempler

  • A framework for the development of guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

    S Lekamwasam;J D Adachi;D Agnusdei;J Bilezikian

  • Risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in elderly men

    T.V. Nguyen;J.A. Eisman;P.J. Kelly;P.N. Sambrook

  • Obesity is not protective against fracture in postmenopausal women: GLOW.

    Juliet E. Compston;Nelson B. Watts;Roland D. Chapurlat;Cyrus Cooper

  • Loss of muscle strength, mass (sarcopenia), and quality (specific force) and its relationship with functional limitation and physical disability: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project.

    Noran N. Hairi;Robert G. Cumming;Vasi Naganathan;David J. Handelsman

  • The impact of obesity on the musculoskeletal system

    A Anandacoomarasamy;I Caterson;P Sambrook;M Fransen

  • Lumbar disc degeneration and genetic factors are the main risk factors for low back pain in women: the UK Twin Spine Study

    Gregory Livshits;Maria Popham;Ida Malkin;Philip N Sambrook

  • Zoledronic acid and risedronate in the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (HORIZON): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial.

    David M Reid;Jean-Pierre Devogelaer;Kenneth Saag;Christian Roux

  • Muscle strength, physical fitness, and weight but not age predict femoral neck bone mass.

    Nicholas Pocock;Nicholas Pocock;John Eisman;Tom Gwinn;Philip Sambrook

  • The incidence of hip fracture in four Asian countries: the Asian Osteoporosis Study (AOS).

    Edith M. C. Lau;J. K. Lee;P. Suriwongpaisal;S. M. Saw

  • Intravenous Ibandronate Injections in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis One-Year Results From the Dosing Intravenous Administration Study

    Pierre D. Delmas;Silvano Adami;Cezary Strugala;Jacob A. Stakkestad

  • Deterioration in Quality of Life Following Hip Fracture: A Prospective Study

    A. G. Randell;T. V. Nguyen;N. Bhalerao;S. L. Silverman

  • Efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: results of a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial

    Jean-Yves Reginster;Janusz Badurski;Nicholas Bellamy;William Bensen

  • Structural, psychological, and genetic influences on low back and neck pain: a study of adult female twins.

    Alexander J. MacGregor;Toby Andrew;Philip N. Sambrook;Tim D. Spector

Frequent Co-Authors

Lyn March
Lyn March University of Sydney
Robert G. Cumming
Robert G. Cumming University of Sydney
Markus J. Seibel
Markus J. Seibel University of Sydney
John A. Eisman
John A. Eisman Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Ian D. Cameron
Ian D. Cameron University of Sydney
Tuan V. Nguyen
Tuan V. Nguyen University of Technology Sydney
Stephen R. Lord
Stephen R. Lord University of New South Wales
David G. Le Couteur
David G. Le Couteur University of Sydney
Fiona M. Blyth
Fiona M. Blyth University of Sydney
David J. Handelsman
David J. Handelsman University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare but not sure if a traditional pre-med route is right for you? There are many respected online degrees and career pathways in medicine and health-related fields. For students passionate about nutrition, the best online food science degree programs can lead to careers in nutrition, wellness consulting, and food technology.

Accreditation is vital when considering an online healthcare degree. It ensures your qualification is respected and recognized. Explore which online healthcare degree programs are recognized for their accreditation by cahme? if you aim to advance in healthcare management or administration.

Registered nurses can expand their credentials by pursuing a bachelor’s degree online. Flexible options like the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements appeal to working professionals who need to balance their studies and careers.

For nurse practitioners and those pursuing advanced clinical roles, time-efficient online doctorates are available. Consider the shortest dnp programs to accelerate your path to advanced practice and leadership.

These alternative online programs open doors to wide-ranging health careers—many complementary to studying medicine in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Philip N. Sambrook