World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
147
Citations
79293
World Ranking
1289
National Ranking
37

John A. Eisman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Eisman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 642 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John A. Eisman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Eisman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 147 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Australia Leader Award
  • 2015 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science

Overview

John A. Eisman is affiliated with the Garvan Institute of Medical Research in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on bone health and osteoporosis research. Their work spans various subfields including surgery, orthopedics and sports medicine, molecular biology, physiology, and epidemiology.

The scientist has published research on several major topics, including:

  • Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Hip and femur fractures
  • Hip disorders and treatments
  • Bone metabolism and diseases
  • Nutrition and health in aging
  • Bariatric surgery and outcomes
  • Bone fractures and treatments

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include Jacqueline R. Center, Tuan V. Nguyen, Dana Bliuc, Thach Tran, and Paul A. Baldock. Their publications often appear in journals such as Osteoporosis International, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, International Journal of Obesity, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, and Journal of Religion and Health.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by John A. Eisman include:

  • Osteocyte transcriptome mapping identifies a molecular landscape controlling skeletal homeostasis and susceptibility to skeletal disease, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Prevalence of osteoporosis and incidence of related fractures in developed economies in the Asia Pacific region: a systematic review, 2023, Osteoporosis International
  • Previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk: a meta-analysis to update FRAX, 2023, Osteoporosis International
  • A meta-analysis of previous falls and subsequent fracture risk in cohort studies, 2024, Osteoporosis International
  • Cognitive decline is associated with an accelerated rate of bone loss and increased fracture risk in women: a prospective study from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study, 2021, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

The scope of John A. Eisman's work largely centers on skeletal health, examining factors influencing bone loss, fracture risk, and broader metabolic processes impacting bone diseases and recovery outcomes.

In recognition of their contributions to health and medical science, John A. Eisman was named a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Prediction of Bone-Density from Vitamin-D Receptor Alleles

    Nigel A. Morrison;Jian Cheng Qi;Akifumi Tokita;Paul J. Kelly

  • Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study

    Tuan V Nguyen;Diane Schneider;Philip N Sambrook

  • Global vitamin D status and determinants of hypovitaminosis D.

    A. Mithal;D. A. Wahl;Jean-Philippe Bonjour;P. Burckhardt

  • Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: A meta-analysis

    C De Laet;JA Kanis;A Oden;H Johanson

  • Mortality Risk Associated With Low-Trauma Osteoporotic Fracture and Subsequent Fracture in Men and Women

    Dana Bliuc;Nguyen D. Nguyen;Vivienne E. Milch;Tuan V. Nguyen

  • Predictive Value of BMD for Hip and Other Fractures

    Olof Johnell;John A Kanis;Anders Oden;Helena Johansson

  • Genetic determinants of bone mass in adults. A twin study.

    N A Pocock;J A Eisman;J L Hopper;M G Yeates

  • A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk

    J A Kanis;O Johnell;C De Laet;Helena Johansson

  • The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women.

    J A Kanis;Anders Odén;O Johnell;Helena Johansson

  • Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture

    Karol Estrada;Unnur Styrkarsdottir;Evangelos Evangelou;Yi-Hsiang Hsu

  • Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis

    J A Kanis;O Johnell;Anders Odén;Helena Johansson

  • A meta-analysis of prior corticosteroid use and fracture risk.

    John A Kanis;Helena Johansson;Anders Oden;Olof Johnell

  • Intestinal Calcium Absorption and Serum Vitamin D Metabolites in Normal Subjects and Osteoporotic Patients: EFFECT OF AGE AND DIETARY CALCIUM

    J C Gallagher;B L Riggs;J Eisman;A Hamstra

  • Alcohol intake as a risk factor for fracture.

    John A. Kanis;Helena Johansson;Olof Johnell;Anders Oden

  • Contribution of trans-acting factor alleles to normal physiological variability: vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and circulating osteocalcin

    Nigel A. Morrison;Rosanne Yeoman;Paul J. Kelly;John A. Eisman

  • Multiple Genetic Loci for Bone Mineral Density and Fractures

    Unnur Styrkarsdottir;Bjarni V. Halldorsson;Solveig Gretarsdottir;Daniel F. Gudbjartsson

  • Risk of Subsequent Fracture After Low-Trauma Fracture in Men and Women

    Dana Bliuc;Tuan V. Nguyen;John A. Eisman

  • Prediction of osteoporotic fractures by postural instability and bone density.

    Tuan Nguyen;P. Sambrook;P. Kelly;G. Jones

  • Prevention of corticosteroid osteoporosis. A comparison of calcium, calcitriol, and calcitonin.

    Philip Sambrook;Joan Birmingham;Paul Kelly;Susan Kempler

  • Risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in elderly men

    T.V. Nguyen;J.A. Eisman;P.J. Kelly;P.N. Sambrook

Frequent Co-Authors

Tuan V. Nguyen
Tuan V. Nguyen University of Technology Sydney
Emma L. Duncan
Emma L. Duncan King's College London
Graeme Jones
Graeme Jones University of Tasmania
Richard L. Prince
Richard L. Prince University of Western Australia
Amanda Sainsbury
Amanda Sainsbury University of Western Australia
Herbert Herzog
Herbert Herzog Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Piet Geusens
Piet Geusens Maastricht University
Matthew A. Brown
Matthew A. Brown Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Philip N. Sambrook
Philip N. Sambrook University of Sydney
Eugene V. McCloskey
Eugene V. McCloskey University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online alternatives can open diverse opportunities in the healthcare field—often with more flexibility and accessibility than traditional medical programs. For students considering practical patient care, finding what’s the easiest nursing program to get into? can be a valuable first step, especially for those seeking a straightforward admissions process.

Financial support is a key consideration. Many prospective students look for medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, ensuring access to federal aid options. These programs often lead to administrative roles with high job demand and relatively quick entry into the workforce.

It’s important to note that some nursing schools waive standardized testing. Wondering do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school? The answer may surprise you, with various schools offering multiple admission pathways.

For those interested in healthcare management, consider online healthcare administration programs. These degrees prepare graduates for leadership positions, blending healthcare knowledge with business skills—perfect for students aiming to shape the future of health services.

Best Scientists Citing John A. Eisman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles