World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Scott M. Palmer

Scott M. Palmer

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
23980
World Ranking
13321
National Ranking
6777

Scott M. Palmer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott M. Palmer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 509 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Scott M. Palmer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott M. Palmer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott M. Palmer is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with significant contributions across several subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, Transplantation, and Oncology.

The main topics of their work encompass:

  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Respiratory viral infections research
  • Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment
  • Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments

Scott M. Palmer has published extensively in a range of medical journals. Their most frequent publication venues are:

  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • CHEST Journal
  • American Journal of Transplantation
  • Annals of the American Thoracic Society

Their recent papers include:

  • "Circulating matrix metalloproteinases and tissue metalloproteinase inhibitors in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the multicenter IPF-PRO Registry cohort" (2020), published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine
  • "Contemporary trends in PGD incidence, outcomes, and therapies" (2022), published in The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • "Risk Factors for Acute Rejection in the First Year after Lung Transplant. A Multicenter Study" (2020), published in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • "Liothyronine and Desiccated Thyroid Extract in the Treatment of Hypothyroidism" (2020), published in Thyroid
  • "LPA1 antagonist BMS-986020 changes collagen dynamics and exerts antifibrotic effects in vitro and in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis" (2022), published in Respiratory Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Scott M. Palmer include:

  • Megan L. Neely
  • Jamie L. Todd
  • Laurie D. Snyder
  • John A. Belperio
  • Courtney W. Frankel

The broad scope of their research reflects substantial involvement in clinical and translational studies related to lung transplantation, interstitial lung diseases, and pulmonary complications associated with transplant procedures. Their publications often address the evaluation of outcomes, pathological mechanisms, and therapeutic approaches within these medical areas.

Best Publications

  • International guidelines for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2006 update--a consensus report from the Pulmonary Scientific Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

    Jonathan B. Orens;Marc Estenne;Selim Arcasoy;John V. Conte

  • Clinical risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation

    Joshua M. Diamond;James C. Lee;Steven M. Kawut;Rupal J. Shah

  • Improved lung allograft function after fundoplication in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease undergoing lung transplantation.

    R.Duane Davis;Christine L. Lau;Steve Eubanks;Robert H. Messier

  • Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk (STAR) 2017 Working Group Meeting Report.

    Anat R. Tambur;Patricia Campbell;Frans H. Claas;Sandy Feng

  • Early Fundoplication Prevents Chronic Allograft Dysfunction in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

    Edward Cantu;James Z. Appel;Matthew G. Hartwig;Hiwot Woreta

  • Extended valganciclovir prophylaxis to prevent cytomegalovirus after lung transplantation: a randomized, controlled trial.

    Scott M. Palmer;Ajit P. Limaye;Missy Banks;Dianne Gallup

  • Massive Pulmonary Edema and Death After Prostacyclin Infusion in a Patient With Pulmonary Veno-occlusive Disease

    Scott M. Palmer;Lisa J. Robinson;Andrew Wang;James R. Gossage

  • Comparative safety of amphotericin B lipid complex and amphotericin B deoxycholate as aerosolized antifungal prophylaxis in lung-transplant recipients.

    Richard H. Drew;Elizabeth Dodds Ashley;Daniel K. Benjamin;R. Duane Davis

  • Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome: The Final Frontier for Lung Transplantation

    Jamie L. Todd;Scott M Palmer

  • The role of innate immunity in acute allograft rejection after lung transplantation.

    Scott M. Palmer;Lauranell H. Burch;R. Duane Davis;Walter F. Herczyk

  • The role of hyaluronan degradation products as innate alloimmune agonists.

    B. M. Tesar;D. Jiang;J. Liang;S. M. Palmer

  • Lung Transplantation Exacerbates Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

    Lisa R. Young;Denis Hadjiliadis;R. Duane Davis;Scott M. Palmer

  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease in lung transplant recipients.

    Denis Hadjiliadis;R Duane Davis;Mark P Steele;Robert H Messier

  • Chronic lung allograft dysfunction: Definition and update of restrictive allograft syndrome-A consensus report from the Pulmonary Council of the ISHLT.

    Allan R. Glanville;Geert M. Verleden;Jamie L. Todd;Christian Benden

  • Development of an antibody specific to major histocompatibility antigens detectable by flow cytometry after lung transplant is associated with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.

    Scott M. Palmer;R. Duane Davis;Denis Hadjiliadis;Marshall I. Hertz

  • Survival After Lung Transplantation of Cystic Fibrosis Patients Infected with Burkholderia cepacia Complex

    B. D. Alexander;E. W. Petzold;L. B. Reller;S. M. Palmer

  • An Exome Sequencing Study to Assess the Role of Rare Genetic Variation in Pulmonary Fibrosis.

    Slavé Petrovski;Slavé Petrovski;Jamie L. Todd;Jamie L. Todd;Michael T. Durheim;Michael T. Durheim;Quanli Wang

  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa Elastase Degrades Surfactant Proteins A and D

    William I. Mariencheck;John F. Alcorn;Scott M. Palmer;Jo Rae Wright

  • Acute rejection and humoral sensitization in lung transplant recipients.

    Tereza Martinu;Dong-Feng Chen;Scott M. Palmer

  • Cytomegalovirus Pneumonitis Is a Risk for Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome in Lung Transplantation

    Laurie D. Snyder;C. Ashley Finlen-Copeland;W. Jackson Turbyfill;David Howell

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason D. Christie
Jason D. Christie University of Pennsylvania
John A. Belperio
John A. Belperio University of California, Los Angeles
Lorraine B. Ware
Lorraine B. Ware Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Steven M. Kawut
Steven M. Kawut University of Pennsylvania
James A. Blumenthal
James A. Blumenthal Duke University
Shaf Keshavjee
Shaf Keshavjee University Health Network
Patrick Smith
Patrick Smith University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Victor F. Tapson
Victor F. Tapson Duke University
Kevin R. Flaherty
Kevin R. Flaherty University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Paul W. Noble
Paul W. Noble Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical education in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options and career pathways. For those looking to advance their clinical expertise, pursuing the easiest dnp program online can provide a direct route to leadership roles in nursing practice, often with flexible admissions and course schedules.

If you're aiming to enter the healthcare field quickly, an accelerated lpn program allows students to complete their studies faster, helping them start a nursing career in less time than traditional pathways.

Specializing further, the fastest psychiatric nurse practitioner program can lead to advanced credentials focused on mental health. This pathway prepares graduates to meet growing industry demand for psychiatric care providers.

For those more interested in healthcare leadership and management, a bachelors in health administration can be a cost-effective way to enter non-clinical roles and shape the future of healthcare systems.

Each of these online options offers unique benefits, helping you carve out a rewarding career in medicine and healthcare, whether at the bedside or behind the scenes.

Best Scientists Citing Scott M. Palmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles