World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Scott M. Palmer

Scott M. Palmer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 13320 12536 6776 6267 509 23980

Scott M. Palmer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott M. Palmer between 1991 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott M. Palmer published across 36 years, from 1991 to 2026, averaging 16.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2020. 26 of the 588 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2020. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 30 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 41 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 25 publications 2026: 1 publication
1991 2026

588 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott M. Palmer: publications per year, 1991 to 2026
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 4
1998 10
1999 4
2000 4
2001 11
2002 17
2003 19
2004 18
2005 16
2006 22
2007 9
2008 13
2009 15
2010 23
2011 30
2012 25
2013 26
2014 30
2015 15
2016 27
2017 22
2018 22
2019 31
2020 41
2021 23
2022 23
2023 30
2024 26
2025 25
2026 1
Total 588
Download as CSV

Scott M. Palmer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott M. Palmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 509 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 509
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott M. Palmer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott M. Palmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott M. Palmer is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with significant contributions across several subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, Transplantation, and Oncology.

The main topics of their work encompass:

  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Respiratory viral infections research
  • Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment
  • Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments

Scott M. Palmer has published extensively in a range of medical journals. Their most frequent publication venues are:

  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • CHEST Journal
  • American Journal of Transplantation
  • Annals of the American Thoracic Society

Their recent papers include:

  • "Circulating matrix metalloproteinases and tissue metalloproteinase inhibitors in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the multicenter IPF-PRO Registry cohort" (2020), published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine
  • "Contemporary trends in PGD incidence, outcomes, and therapies" (2022), published in The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • "Risk Factors for Acute Rejection in the First Year after Lung Transplant. A Multicenter Study" (2020), published in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • "Liothyronine and Desiccated Thyroid Extract in the Treatment of Hypothyroidism" (2020), published in Thyroid
  • "LPA1 antagonist BMS-986020 changes collagen dynamics and exerts antifibrotic effects in vitro and in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis" (2022), published in Respiratory Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Scott M. Palmer include:

  • Megan L. Neely
  • Jamie L. Todd
  • Laurie D. Snyder
  • John A. Belperio
  • Courtney W. Frankel

The broad scope of their research reflects substantial involvement in clinical and translational studies related to lung transplantation, interstitial lung diseases, and pulmonary complications associated with transplant procedures. Their publications often address the evaluation of outcomes, pathological mechanisms, and therapeutic approaches within these medical areas.

Best Publications

  • International guidelines for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2006 update--a consensus report from the Pulmonary Scientific Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

    Jonathan B. Orens;Marc Estenne;Selim Arcasoy;John V. Conte

  • Clinical risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation

    Joshua M. Diamond;James C. Lee;Steven M. Kawut;Rupal J. Shah

  • Improved lung allograft function after fundoplication in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease undergoing lung transplantation.

    R.Duane Davis;Christine L. Lau;Steve Eubanks;Robert H. Messier

  • Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk (STAR) 2017 Working Group Meeting Report.

    Anat R. Tambur;Patricia Campbell;Frans H. Claas;Sandy Feng

  • Early Fundoplication Prevents Chronic Allograft Dysfunction in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

    Edward Cantu;James Z. Appel;Matthew G. Hartwig;Hiwot Woreta

  • Extended valganciclovir prophylaxis to prevent cytomegalovirus after lung transplantation: a randomized, controlled trial.

    Scott M. Palmer;Ajit P. Limaye;Missy Banks;Dianne Gallup

  • Massive Pulmonary Edema and Death After Prostacyclin Infusion in a Patient With Pulmonary Veno-occlusive Disease

    Scott M. Palmer;Lisa J. Robinson;Andrew Wang;James R. Gossage

  • Comparative safety of amphotericin B lipid complex and amphotericin B deoxycholate as aerosolized antifungal prophylaxis in lung-transplant recipients.

    Richard H. Drew;Elizabeth Dodds Ashley;Daniel K. Benjamin;R. Duane Davis

  • Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome: The Final Frontier for Lung Transplantation

    Jamie L. Todd;Scott M Palmer

  • The role of innate immunity in acute allograft rejection after lung transplantation.

    Scott M. Palmer;Lauranell H. Burch;R. Duane Davis;Walter F. Herczyk

  • The role of hyaluronan degradation products as innate alloimmune agonists.

    B. M. Tesar;D. Jiang;J. Liang;S. M. Palmer

  • Lung Transplantation Exacerbates Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

    Lisa R. Young;Denis Hadjiliadis;R. Duane Davis;Scott M. Palmer

  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease in lung transplant recipients.

    Denis Hadjiliadis;R Duane Davis;Mark P Steele;Robert H Messier

  • Chronic lung allograft dysfunction: Definition and update of restrictive allograft syndrome-A consensus report from the Pulmonary Council of the ISHLT.

    Allan R. Glanville;Geert M. Verleden;Jamie L. Todd;Christian Benden

  • Development of an antibody specific to major histocompatibility antigens detectable by flow cytometry after lung transplant is associated with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.

    Scott M. Palmer;R. Duane Davis;Denis Hadjiliadis;Marshall I. Hertz

  • Survival After Lung Transplantation of Cystic Fibrosis Patients Infected with Burkholderia cepacia Complex

    B. D. Alexander;E. W. Petzold;L. B. Reller;S. M. Palmer

  • An Exome Sequencing Study to Assess the Role of Rare Genetic Variation in Pulmonary Fibrosis.

    Slavé Petrovski;Slavé Petrovski;Jamie L. Todd;Jamie L. Todd;Michael T. Durheim;Michael T. Durheim;Quanli Wang

  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa Elastase Degrades Surfactant Proteins A and D

    William I. Mariencheck;John F. Alcorn;Scott M. Palmer;Jo Rae Wright

  • Acute rejection and humoral sensitization in lung transplant recipients.

    Tereza Martinu;Dong-Feng Chen;Scott M. Palmer

  • Cytomegalovirus Pneumonitis Is a Risk for Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome in Lung Transplantation

    Laurie D. Snyder;C. Ashley Finlen-Copeland;W. Jackson Turbyfill;David Howell

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason D. Christie
Jason D. Christie University of Pennsylvania
John A. Belperio
John A. Belperio University of California, Los Angeles
Lorraine B. Ware
Lorraine B. Ware Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Steven M. Kawut
Steven M. Kawut University of Pennsylvania
James A. Blumenthal
James A. Blumenthal Duke University
Shaf Keshavjee
Shaf Keshavjee University Health Network
Patrick Smith
Patrick Smith University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Victor F. Tapson
Victor F. Tapson Duke University
Kevin R. Flaherty
Kevin R. Flaherty University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Paul W. Noble
Paul W. Noble Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical education in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options and career pathways. For those looking to advance their clinical expertise, pursuing the easiest dnp program online can provide a direct route to leadership roles in nursing practice, often with flexible admissions and course schedules.

If you're aiming to enter the healthcare field quickly, an accelerated lpn program allows students to complete their studies faster, helping them start a nursing career in less time than traditional pathways.

Specializing further, the fastest psychiatric nurse practitioner program can lead to advanced credentials focused on mental health. This pathway prepares graduates to meet growing industry demand for psychiatric care providers.

For those more interested in healthcare leadership and management, a bachelors in health administration can be a cost-effective way to enter non-clinical roles and shape the future of healthcare systems.

Each of these online options offers unique benefits, helping you carve out a rewarding career in medicine and healthcare, whether at the bedside or behind the scenes.

Best Scientists Citing Scott M. Palmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles