World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Dirk Van Raemdonck

Dirk Van Raemdonck

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 77 18516 17397 235 225 845 19239

Dirk Van Raemdonck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dirk Van Raemdonck between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dirk Van Raemdonck published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 29.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 75 publications in 2022. 82 of the 988 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 75. Peak 75 publications in 2022. 1992: 5 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 32 publications 2008: 47 publications 2009: 53 publications 2010: 54 publications 2011: 40 publications 2012: 44 publications 2013: 53 publications 2014: 45 publications 2015: 58 publications 2016: 47 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 46 publications 2022: 75 publications 2023: 39 publications 2024: 47 publications 2025: 35 publications
1992 2025

988 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dirk Van Raemdonck: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 5
1993 10
1994 4
1995 4
1996 11
1997 9
1998 7
1999 12
2000 7
2001 13
2002 5
2003 14
2004 13
2005 17
2006 21
2007 32
2008 47
2009 53
2010 54
2011 40
2012 44
2013 53
2014 45
2015 58
2016 47
2017 33
2018 24
2019 27
2020 37
2021 46
2022 75
2023 39
2024 47
2025 35
Total 988
Download as CSV

Dirk Van Raemdonck publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Van Raemdonck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 841–860 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 845 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177 845
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Dirk Van Raemdonck D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Van Raemdonck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730 77
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Dirk Van Raemdonck is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly specializing in surgery and pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Their research encompasses a broad range of topics primarily focused on transplantation methods and outcomes.

Their work spans multiple areas including:

  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Tracheal and airway disorders
  • Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma

Van Raemdonck's frequent coauthors include Laurens J. Ceulemans, Robin Vos, Arne Neyrinck, Bart Vanaudenaerde, and Geert M. Verleden, reflecting long-standing collaborative relationships in their research field.

Their recent papers showcase research in lung transplantation and critical care, published in well-established journals. Notable publications include:

  • "Survival in adult lung transplantation: where are we in 2020?" (2020), Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation
  • "Expanding controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death: statement from an international collaborative" (2021), Intensive Care Medicine
  • "Small airways pathology in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study" (2020), The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • "The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2022 Expert Consensus Document: The use of mechanical circulatory support in lung transplantation" (2022), Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • "Effect of mode of intraoperative support on primary graft dysfunction after lung transplant" (2022), Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Van Raemdonck has published extensively in several prominent journals, with the highest frequency in:

  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Transplantation
  • American Journal of Transplantation

Their contributions also include book publications, notably a 2024 work titled Non-infectious complications: mechanical published by the European Respiratory Society.

Overall, Dirk Van Raemdonck's research profile is characterized by a strong focus on transplantation science and surgical aspects of pulmonary medicine, supported by collaborations with specialists in related fields and publications in leading scientific venues.

Best Publications

  • A review of lung transplant donor acceptability criteria.

    Jonathan B Orens;Annette Boehler;Marc de Perrot;Marc Estenne

  • Azithromycin reduces airway neutrophilia and interleukin-8 in patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

    Geert M. Verleden;Bart M. Vanaudenaerde;Lieven J. Dupont;Dirk E. Van Raemdonck

  • Tracheal allotransplantation after withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy

    Pierre Delaere;Jan Vranckx;Geert Verleden;Paul De Leyn

  • Histopathologic validation of lymph node staging with FDG-PET scan in cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: A prospective study based on primary surgery with extensive lymphadenectomy.

    Toni Lerut;Patrick Flamen;Nadine Ectors;Erik Van Cutsem

  • Postoperative complications after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction are correlated with early cancer recurrence: role of systematic grading of complications using the modified Clavien classification.

    Toni Lerut;Johnny Moons;Willy Coosemans;Dirk Van Raemdonck

  • Prospective Comparative Study of Integrated Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Scan Compared With Remediastinoscopy in the Assessment of Residual Mediastinal Lymph Node Disease After Induction Chemotherapy for Mediastinoscopy-Proven Stage IIIA-N2 Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Leuven Lung Cancer Group Study

    Paul De Leyn;Sigrid Stroobants;Walter De Wever;Toni Lerut

  • Pulmonary Metastasectomy A Survey of Current Practice Amongst Members of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons

    Eveline Internullo;Stephen D. Cassivi;Dirk Van Raemdonck;Godehard Friedel

  • Lung Donor Selection and Management

    Dirk Van Raemdonck;Arne Neyrinck;Geert M Verleden;Lieven Dupont

  • Normothermic ex-vivo preservation with the portable Organ Care System Lung device for bilateral lung transplantation (INSPIRE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 study

    Gregor Warnecke;Dirk Van Raemdonck;Michael A Smith;Gilbert Massard

  • International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Donation After Circulatory Death Registry Report

    Marcelo Cypel;Bronwyn Levvey;Dirk Van Raemdonck;Michiel Erasmus

  • Risk factors for airway complications within the first year after lung transplantation

    Caroline Van De Wauwer;Dirk Van Raemdonck;Geert M. Verleden;Lieven Dupont

  • Survival in adult lung transplantation: where are we in 2020?

    Saskia Bos;Robin Vos;Dirk E Van Raemdonck;Geert M Verleden

  • Tumours of the thymus: a cohort study of prognostic factors from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database.

    Enrico Ruffini;Frank Detterbeck;Dirk Van Raemdonck;Gaetano Rocco

  • Non-heart-beating donors.

    Dirk E.M. Van Raemdonck;Dirk E.M. Van Raemdonck;Filip R. Rega;Arne P. Neyrinck;Nicole Jannis

  • Ex-vivo lung perfusion.

    Dirk Van Raemdonck;Arne Neyrinck;Marcelo Cypel;Shaf Keshavjee

  • Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer

    Georges Decker;Willy Coosemans;Paul De Leyn;Herbert Decaluwé

  • Thymic carcinoma: a cohort study of patients from the European society of thoracic surgeons database.

    Enrico Ruffini;Frank Detterbeck;Dirk Van Raemdonck;Gaetano Rocco

  • Report of the ISHLT Working Group on Primary Lung Graft Dysfunction part I: introduction and methods.

    Jason D. Christie;Dirk Van Raemdonck;Marc de Perrot;Mark Barr

  • The variability of practice in minimally invasive thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections.

    Gaetano Rocco;Eveline Internullo;Stephen D. Cassivi;Dirk Van Raemdonck

  • Survival determinants in lung transplant patients with chronic allograft dysfunction.

    Geert M. Verleden;Robin Vos;Stijn E. Verleden;Walter De Wever

Frequent Co-Authors

Lieven Dupont
Lieven Dupont KU Leuven
Shaf Keshavjee
Shaf Keshavjee University Health Network
Daniel Sifrim
Daniel Sifrim Queen Mary University of London
Pascal Thomas
Pascal Thomas Aix-Marseille University
Frank C. Detterbeck
Frank C. Detterbeck Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine opens doors to a variety of related healthcare fields that can be accessed through flexible online programs. For those aiming to become a registered nurse without standardized entrance exams, consider exploring lpn to rn programs without teas test. These programs help licensed practical nurses advance their careers without the stress of additional testing requirements.

If your interest lies in healthcare leadership or management, earning a health care administration degree online can be an excellent way to build the skills necessary for overseeing healthcare facilities and operations.

Nurses who wish to expand their scope of practice and specialize further might consider rn to np bridge programs. These online pathways are designed for registered nurses who want to become nurse practitioners without pausing their careers.

Additionally, as preventative health and wellness become more important, an online bachelor's degree in nutrition can provide the expertise needed to guide others toward healthier lifestyles.

Best Scientists Citing Dirk Van Raemdonck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles