World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas K. Waddell

Thomas K. Waddell

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 92 11415 10731 459 434 602 27435

Thomas K. Waddell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas K. Waddell between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas K. Waddell published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 18.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2014. 42 of the 673 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2014. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 6 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 28 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 27 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 31 publications 2013: 39 publications 2014: 42 publications 2015: 36 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 28 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 21 publications
1990 2025

673 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas K. Waddell: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 5
1994 7
1995 4
1996 3
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 6
2002 12
2003 28
2004 14
2005 27
2006 22
2007 24
2008 20
2009 32
2010 30
2011 28
2012 31
2013 39
2014 42
2015 36
2016 24
2017 34
2018 25
2019 23
2020 30
2021 33
2022 28
2023 17
2024 21
2025 21
Total 673
Download as CSV

Thomas K. Waddell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas K. Waddell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–620 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 602 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396 602
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas K. Waddell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas K. Waddell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 92
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas K. Waddell is affiliated with the University Health Network in Canada. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focused specialization in Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Biomedical Engineering, and Transplantation.

Their work often covers topics related to transplantation, including methods and outcomes, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, organ transplantation techniques and outcomes, lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, cancer genomics and diagnostics, renal transplantation outcomes and treatments, and biomedical applications of electrospun nanofibers.

Frequent coauthors in their publications include Shaf Keshavjee, Marcelo Cypel, Kazuhiro Yasufuku, Laura Donahoe, and Marc de Perrot.

Waddell has contributed numerous papers to various journals. Notable recent publications include:

  • Efficacy of Reduced-Intensity Chemotherapy With Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine on Quality of Life and Cancer Control Among Older and Frail Patients With Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer (2021, JAMA Oncology)
  • Static lung storage at 10°C maintains mitochondrial health and preserves donor organ function (2021, Science Translational Medicine)
  • Short-course, direct-acting antivirals and ezetimibe to prevent HCV infection in recipients of organs from HCV-infected donors: a phase 3, single-centre, open-label study (2020, The Lancet. Gastroenterology & Hepatology)
  • Ex vivo enzymatic treatment converts blood type A donor lungs into universal blood type lungs (2022, Science Translational Medicine)
  • Solid phase microextraction chemical biopsy tool for monitoring of doxorubicin residue during in vivo lung chemo-perfusion (2020, Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis)

Waddell has frequently published in several journals, notably:

  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Normothermic Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in Clinical Lung Transplantation

    Marcelo Cypel;Jonathan C. Yeung;Mingyao Liu;Masaki Anraku

  • Ischemia-reperfusion-induced lung injury.

    Marc de Perrot;Mingyao Liu;Thomas K. Waddell;Shaf Keshavjee

  • A prospective controlled trial of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with mediastinoscopy for mediastinal lymph node staging of lung cancer

    Kazuhiro Yasufuku;Andrew Pierre;Gail Darling;Marc de Perrot

  • Technique for prolonged normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion.

    Marcelo Cypel;Jonathan C. Yeung;Shin Hirayama;Matthew Rubacha

  • Restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS): a novel form of chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

    Masaaki Sato;Thomas K. Waddell;Ute Wagnetz;Heidi C. Roberts

  • Bile acid aspiration and the development of bronchiolitis obliterans after lung transplantation.

    Frank D’Ovidio;Marco Mura;Melanie Tsang;Thomas K. Waddell

  • Functional Repair of Human Donor Lungs by IL-10 Gene Therapy

    Marcelo Cypel;Marcelo Cypel;Mingyao Liu;Mingyao Liu;Matt Rubacha;Jonathan C. Yeung;Jonathan C. Yeung

  • Experience with the first 50 ex vivo lung perfusions in clinical transplantation.

    Marcelo Cypel;Jonathan C. Yeung;Tiago Machuca;Manyin Chen

  • Interleukin-8 release during early reperfusion predicts graft function in human lung transplantation.

    Marc De Perrot;Yasuo Sekine;Stefan Fischer;Thomas K. Waddell

  • 2014 AATS guidelines for the prevention and management of perioperative atrial fibrillation and flutter for thoracic surgical procedures

    Gyorgy Frendl;Alissa C. Sodickson;Mina K. Chung;Albert L. Waldo

  • Normothermic Ex Vivo Perfusion Prevents Lung Injury Compared to Extended Cold Preservation for Transplantation

    M Cypel;M Rubacha;J Yeung;S Hirayama

  • Three-Gene Prognostic Classifier for Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Suzanne K. Lau;Paul C. Boutros;Melania Pintilie;Fiona H. Blackhall

  • Tumor-Initiating Cells Are Rare in Many Human Tumors

    Kota Ishizawa;Zeshaan A. Rasheed;Robert Karisch;Qiuju Wang

  • Marginal donor lungs: a reassessment.

    Andrew F. Pierre;Yasuo Sekine;Michael A. Hutcheon;Thomas K. Waddell

  • Signaling Functions of L-selectin ENHANCEMENT OF TYROSINE PHOSPHORYLATION AND ACTIVATION OF MAP KINASE

    Thomas K. Waddell;Lea Fialkow;Chi Kin Chan;Takashi Kei Kishimoto

  • Restrictive allograft syndrome post lung transplantation is characterized by pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis

    Efrat Ofek;Masaaki Sato;Masaaki Sato;Tomohito Saito;Ute Wagnetz

  • Outcomes of intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus cardiopulmonary bypass for lung transplantation

    Tiago N. Machuca;Stephane Collaud;Olaf Mercier;Maureen Cheung

  • Potentiation of the oxidative burst of human neutrophils. A signaling role for L-selectin.

    T. K. Waddell;L. Fialkow;Chi Kin Chan;T. K. Kishimoto

  • Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux in End-Stage Lung Disease Candidates for Lung Transplant

    Frank D’Ovidio;Lianne G. Singer;Denis Hadjiliadis;Andrew Pierre

  • BOS UPDATE Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome 2001: An Update of the Diagnostic Criteria

    Marc Estenne;Janet R. Maurer;Annette Boehler;James J. Egan

Frequent Co-Authors

Shaf Keshavjee
Shaf Keshavjee University Health Network
Mingyao Liu
Mingyao Liu University Health Network
Marc de Perrot
Marc de Perrot University of Toronto
John Granton
John Granton University of Toronto
Ming-Sound Tsao
Ming-Sound Tsao Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Natasha B. Leighl
Natasha B. Leighl Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Frances A. Shepherd
Frances A. Shepherd Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Gregory P. Downey
Gregory P. Downey National Jewish Health
Arthur S. Slutsky
Arthur S. Slutsky University of Toronto
Andrea Bezjak
Andrea Bezjak Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA can open the door to diverse and rewarding career paths in healthcare. For students considering related fields or alternative routes, many accredited online degree programs are available—often at a fraction of traditional on-campus costs.

Pharmacy is a vital healthcare profession with strong job prospects. For those interested, the best online pharmacy school rankings can help you find high-quality, affordable PharmD programs.

High school students wanting to get a head start in medical fields can explore programs ranked among the best online schools for high school students that focus on health information management and other health science disciplines.

Interested in administrative roles? You can look for the cheapest medical coding certification online to quickly gain skills that are in high demand by hospitals and clinics.

RNs seeking to advance their scope of practice can consider the most affordable online nurse practitioner programs, offering flexible study options while preparing for advanced clinical roles.

These pathways allow you to tailor your healthcare career to your interests and goals—all while benefiting from the flexibility and affordability of online study.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas K. Waddell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles