World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
27529
World Ranking
15527
National Ranking
645

John Granton publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Granton sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 356 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John Granton D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Granton sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Granton is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, with a primary focus on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Their research portfolio encompasses 196 publications, including significant work in subfields such as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, and Biomedical Engineering.

Their research topics broadly cover aspects of Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments, Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management, Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy, Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices, Cardiovascular and Exercise Physiology, and Vascular Anomalies and Treatments.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • Pulmonary Circulation
  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • ERJ Open Research
  • Canadian Journal of Respiratory Critical Care and Sleep Medicine

Among their recent papers are:

  • Cell therapy with intravascular administration of mesenchymal stromal cells continues to appear safe: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis (2020), published in EClinicalMedicine
  • Effect of Probiotics on Incident Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients (2021), published in JAMA
  • Pharmacokinetic Alterations Associated with Critical Illness (2023), published in Clinical Pharmacokinetics
  • Strategies for lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a physiological trial (2022), published in Critical Care
  • Evaluation and management of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension - consensus statement from the ISHLT (2021), published in The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

John Granton has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Marc de Perrot
  • Susanna Mak
  • Laura Donahoe
  • Micheal McInnis
  • Karen McRae

Best Publications

  • Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine Infusion in Patients with Septic Shock

    James A. Russell;Keith R. Walley;Joel Singer;Anthony C. Gordon

  • Evaluation of a ventilation strategy to prevent barotrauma in patients at high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pressure- and Volume-Limited Ventilation Strategy Group.

    T. E. Stewart;M. O. Meade;D. J. Cook;J. T. Granton

  • Safety of Cell Therapy with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (SafeCell): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

    Manoj M. Lalu;Lauralyn McIntyre;Lauralyn McIntyre;Christina Pugliese;Dean Fergusson

  • High-frequency oscillation in early acute respiratory distress syndrome.

    Niall D. Ferguson;Deborah J. Cook;Gordon H. Guyatt;Sangeeta Mehta

  • Bosentan therapy in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

    Nazzareno Galiè;Maurice Beghetti;Michael A. Gatzoulis;John Granton

  • Updated treatment algorithm of pulmonary arterial hypertension

    Nazzareno Galiè;Paul A Corris;Adaani Frost;Reda E Girgis

  • High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: a randomized, controlled trial.

    Stephen Derdak;Sangeeta Mehta;Thomas E Stewart;Terry Smith

  • Effect of nitric oxide on oxygenation and mortality in acute lung injury: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Neill K J Adhikari;Karen E A Burns;Jan O Friedrich;John T Granton

  • Daily Sedation Interruption in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients Cared for With a Sedation Protocol A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Sangeeta Mehta;Lisa Burry;Dean Fergusson;Marilyn Steinberg

  • Derivation and Validation of a Simplified Predictive Index for Renal Replacement Therapy After Cardiac Surgery

    Duminda N. Wijeysundera;Keyvan Karkouti;Jean-Yves Dupuis;Vivek Rao

  • Interobserver variability in applying a radiographic definition for ARDS

    Gordon D. Rubenfeld;Ellen Caldwell;John Granton;Leonard D. Hudson

  • High-Frequency Oscillation in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Niall D. Ferguson;Deborah J. Cook;Gordon H. Guyatt;Sangeeta Mehta

  • Science review: Vasopressin and the cardiovascular system part 1--receptor physiology.

    Cheryl L Holmes;Donald W Landry;John T Granton

  • Evaluation of a Ventilation Strategy to Prevent Barotrauma in Patients at High Risk for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Thomas E. Stewart;Maureen O. Meade;Deborah J. Cook;John T. Granton

  • Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor-2 Signaling Promotes Pulmonary Arterial Endothelial Cell Survival: Implications for Loss-of-Function Mutations in the Pathogenesis of Pulmonary Hypertension

    Krystyna Teichert-Kuliszewska;Michael J.B. Kutryk;Michael A. Kuliszewski;Golnaz Karoubi

  • Assessment of functional capacity before major non-cardiac surgery: an international, prospective cohort study

    Duminda N Wijeysundera;Rupert M Pearse;Mark A Shulman;Mark A Shulman;Tom E F Abbott

  • Influence of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Sepsis on Outcome of Critically Ill Infected Patients

    Corinne Alberti;Christian Brun-Buisson;Sergey V. Goodman;Daniela Guidici

  • Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of delirium in mechanically ventilated adults.

    Sangeeta Mehta;Deborah Cook;John W. Devlin;Yoanna Skrobik

  • Intensive Care Unit Management of Patients with Severe Pulmonary Hypertension and Right Heart Failure

    Marius M. Hoeper;John Granton

  • Longer-term bosentan therapy improves functional capacity in Eisenmenger syndrome: Results of the BREATHE-5 open-label extension study

    Michael A. Gatzoulis;Maurice Beghetti;Nazzareno Galiè;John Granton

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah J. Cook
Deborah J. Cook McMaster University
Marc de Perrot
Marc de Perrot University of Toronto
Shaf Keshavjee
Shaf Keshavjee University Health Network
Sangeeta Mehta
Sangeeta Mehta University of Toronto
Maureen O. Meade
Maureen O. Meade McMaster University
Thomas K. Waddell
Thomas K. Waddell University Health Network
Niall D. Ferguson
Niall D. Ferguson University of Toronto
Dean Fergusson
Dean Fergusson Ottawa Hospital
Robert A. Fowler
Robert A. Fowler Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Paul C. Hébert
Paul C. Hébert University of Alberta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens up various related academic and career opportunities that can be pursued entirely online. If you’re interested in healthcare, but not necessarily becoming a physician, there are numerous alternative online degrees available.

For those who want to focus on diet, health, and disease prevention, a nutrition degree online can provide foundational knowledge and lead to roles in clinical settings, community health, or food service management.

Aspiring healthcare administrators can consider accredited mha programs to gain advanced skills in hospital management, health policy, and leadership—ideal for those seeking roles beyond direct patient care.

Nurses aiming to move up the career ladder may explore rn to bsn online programs without clinicals, designed for flexibility and speed by allowing registered nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree fully online.

For those ready for the highest practice-focused nursing degree, the shortest post master's dnp program options make career advancement more accessible and efficient.

These online pathways allow you to tailor your education to fit your passion and professional goals within the broader healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing John Granton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles