World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sangeeta Mehta

Sangeeta Mehta

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 86 13835 13023 569 542 320 57624

Sangeeta Mehta publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sangeeta Mehta between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sangeeta Mehta published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 13.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2019. 48 of the 392 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2019. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 20 publications
1996 2025

392 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sangeeta Mehta: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 1
1998 2
1999 2
2000 4
2001 7
2002 11
2003 5
2004 12
2005 6
2006 7
2007 3
2008 4
2009 9
2010 6
2011 11
2012 16
2013 11
2014 13
2015 20
2016 31
2017 26
2018 13
2019 33
2020 24
2021 25
2022 18
2023 22
2024 28
2025 20
Total 392
Download as CSV

Sangeeta Mehta publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sangeeta Mehta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 320 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834 320
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Sangeeta Mehta D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sangeeta Mehta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 86
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sangeeta Mehta is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their academic work predominantly belongs to the field of Medicine, with a specialization in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics including:

  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

Their recent published papers include:

  • Outcome of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: insights from the LUNG SAFE Study, 2020, European Respiratory Journal
  • Impact of exposure time in awake prone positioning on clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure treated with high-flow nasal oxygen: a multicenter cohort study, 2022, Critical Care
  • Impact of Reverse Triggering Dyssynchrony during Lung-Protective Ventilation on Diaphragm Function: An Experimental Model, 2021, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Clinical characteristics, systemic complications, and in-hospital outcomes for patients with COVID-19 in Latin America. LIVEN-Covid-19 study: A prospective, multicenter, multinational, cohort study, 2022, PLoS ONE
  • Microcirculatory dysfunction and dead-space ventilation in early ARDS: a hypothesis-generating observational study, 2020, Annals of Intensive Care

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Sangeeta Mehta include:

  • Guillermo Bugedo
  • Roque Basoalto
  • Jaime Retamal
  • L. Felipe Damiani
  • Rodrigo Cornejo

Their work is regularly published in a set of recurring venues:

  • Critical Care Science
  • Critical Care
  • Annals of Intensive Care
  • Respiratory Care
  • Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva

Best Publications

  • Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

    Andrew Rhodes;Laura E. Evans;Waleed Alhazzani;Mitchell M. Levy

  • Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome.

    Herridge Ms;Tansey Cm;Matté A;Tomlinson G

  • One-Year Outcomes in Survivors of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Margaret S. Herridge;Angela M. Cheung;Catherine M. Tansey;Andrea Matte-Martyn

  • Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine Infusion in Patients with Septic Shock

    James A. Russell;Keith R. Walley;Joel Singer;Anthony C. Gordon

  • Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure

    Bram Rochwerg;Laurent Brochard;Laurent Brochard;Mark W. Elliott;Dean Hess

  • High-frequency oscillation in early acute respiratory distress syndrome.

    Niall D. Ferguson;Deborah J. Cook;Gordon H. Guyatt;Sangeeta Mehta

  • Randomized, prospective trial of bilevel versus continuous positive airway pressure in acute pulmonary edema

    Sangeeta Mehta;Gregory D. Jay;Robert H. Woolard;Rene A. Hipona

  • High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: a randomized, controlled trial.

    Stephen Derdak;Sangeeta Mehta;Thomas E Stewart;Terry Smith

  • Daily Sedation Interruption in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients Cared for With a Sedation Protocol A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Sangeeta Mehta;Lisa Burry;Dean Fergusson;Marilyn Steinberg

  • Two-year outcomes, health care use, and costs of survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

    Angela M Cheung;Catherine M Tansey;George Tomlinson;Natalia Diaz-Granados

  • Clinical practice guidelines for the use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation and noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure in the acute care setting

    Sean P. Keenan;Tasnim Sinuff;Karen E.A. Burns;John Muscedere

  • Handheld Computing in Medicine

    Sandra Fischer;Thomas E. Stewart;Sangeeta Mehta;Randy S Wax

  • High-Frequency Oscillation in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Niall D. Ferguson;Deborah J. Cook;Gordon H. Guyatt;Sangeeta Mehta

  • Recruitment maneuvers for acute lung injury: a systematic review.

    Eddy Fan;M. Elizabeth Wilcox;Roy G. Brower;Thomas E. Stewart

  • Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications of Endotoxemia in Critical Illness: Results of the MEDIC Study

    John C. Marshall;Debra Foster;Jean-Louis Vincent;Deborah J. Cook

  • One-Year Outcomes in Caregivers of Critically Ill Patients

    Jill I. Cameron;Leslie M. Chu;Andrea Matte;George Tomlinson

  • Canadian survey of the use of sedatives, analgesics, and neuromuscular blocking agents in critically ill patients

    Sangeeta Mehta;Lisa Burry;Sandra Fischer;J. Carlos Martinez-Motta

  • Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of delirium in mechanically ventilated adults.

    Sangeeta Mehta;Deborah Cook;John W. Devlin;Yoanna Skrobik

  • The RECOVER Program: Disability Risk Groups and 1-Year Outcome after 7 or More Days of Mechanical Ventilation.

    Margaret S Herridge;Leslie M Chu;Andrea Matte;George Tomlinson

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah J. Cook
Deborah J. Cook McMaster University
Niall D. Ferguson
Niall D. Ferguson University of Toronto
Maureen O. Meade
Maureen O. Meade McMaster University
Neill K. J. Adhikari
Neill K. J. Adhikari University of Toronto
John Granton
John Granton University of Toronto
Yaseen M. Arabi
Yaseen M. Arabi King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences
Robert A. Fowler
Robert A. Fowler Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Dean Fergusson
Dean Fergusson Ottawa Hospital
John C. Marshall
John C. Marshall University of Toronto
Elie Azoulay
Elie Azoulay Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Medicine but seeking flexible study options, a range of healthcare degrees can be pursued online. These pathways offer specialized skills and credentials, often at a more affordable cost and pace that suits working professionals or international students.

Prospective nurse practitioners may consider the cheapest dnp programs online to earn an advanced nursing degree without the financial strain typically associated with on-campus study. Pharmacy careers are also becoming more accessible, with accredited pharmacy school online programs offering a blend of virtual coursework and clinical experience.

For those interested in the administrative and digital side of healthcare, there are rhia certification programs online that prepare graduates for leadership roles in health information management. Those looking for a shorter learning path might explore medical billing and coding certification online to quickly enter the growing field of medical billing.

Exploring these online degree and certification pathways can open doors to meaningful healthcare careers, both inside and outside of clinical settings.

Best Scientists Citing Sangeeta Mehta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles