World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 32 12968 12585 5233 4990 100 6045

Michael C. Burl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael C. Burl between 1981 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael C. Burl published across 38 years, from 1981 to 2018, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2001. 2 of the 116 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2001. 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication
1981 2018

116 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael C. Burl: publications per year, 1981 to 2018
Year Publications
1981 3
1982 2
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 1
1988 1
1989 3
1990 4
1991 2
1992 1
1993 2
1994 9
1995 7
1996 6
1997 0
1998 5
1999 3
2000 2
2001 11
2002 6
2003 2
2004 1
2005 1
2006 7
2007 4
2008 6
2009 2
2010 2
2011 2
2012 8
2013 3
2014 2
2015 2
2016 2
2017 1
2018 1
Total 116
Download as CSV

Michael C. Burl publications per year - data summary

  • Michael C. Burl, a Computer Science scholar from Jet Propulsion Lab, has 116 publications recorded across 38 years, from 1981 to 2018.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1981 and the most recent to 2018.
  • The most productive year is 2001, with 11 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1987, 1988, 1992, 2004 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 38 years in the span carry no publications at all (1983, 1984, 1985 and 1997).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.4 per year counting only the 34 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2014-2018) hold 8 publications, 7% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1981-1993: 21 publications (1.6 per year); 1994-2006: 60 publications (4.6 per year); 2007-2018: 35 publications (2.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Michael C. Burl publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael C. Burl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 92–101 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 100 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421 100
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael C. Burl publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Michael C. Burl, a Computer Science scholar from Jet Propulsion Lab, records 100 publications - the 8th percentile of the discipline.
  • 8% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Michael C. Burl, and about 92% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Michael C. Burl ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Michael C. Burl D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael C. Burl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983 32
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Michael C. Burl D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Michael C. Burl, a Computer Science scholar from Jet Propulsion Lab, records 32 D-Index - the 10th percentile of the discipline.
  • 10% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Michael C. Burl, and about 90% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Michael C. Burl ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Michael C. Burl is affiliated with the Jet Propulsion Lab in the United States, a research institution known for its involvement in space exploration and technology development.

The available data does not list specific recent papers authored by Michael C. Burl.

There are no documented frequent co-authors associated with their research collaborations.

No information is provided on regular publication venues for their work.

The record does not show any book publications linked to this scientist.

Details regarding main fields of study, subfields of study, and principal research topics are not specified.

There is no information about awards received by Michael C. Burl.

The scientist is currently living.

Best Publications

  • Finding faces in cluttered scenes using random labeled graph matching

    T.K. Leung;M.C. Burl;P. Perona

  • Optimal speckle reduction in polarimetric SAR imagery

    L.M. Novak;M.C. Burl

  • Optimal polarimetric processing for enhanced target detection

    L.M. Novak;M.C. Burl;W.W. Irving

  • A Probabilistic Approach to Object Recognition Using Local Photometry and Global Geometry

    Michael C. Burl;Markus Weber;Pietro Perona;Pietro Perona

  • Inferring Ground Truth from Subjective Labelling of Venus Images

    Padhraic Smyth;Usama M. Fayyad;Michael C. Burl;Pietro Perona

  • Initial clinical evaluation of a whole body nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tomograph.

    Young Ir;Bailes Dr;Burl M;Collins Ag

  • Entropy-based active learning for object recognition

    A. Holub;P. Perona;M.C. Burl

  • Systems and methods for the automated sensing of motion in a mobile robot using visual data

    Michael Christopher Burl;Paolo Pirjanian

  • IMAGING OF THE BRAIN BY NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE

    F.H. Doyle;J.M. Pennock;J.S. Orr;J.C. Gore

  • IMAGING OF THE BRAIN BY NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE

    F. H. Doyle;J. M. Pennock;J. S. Orr;J. C. Gore

  • Recognition of planar object classes

    M.C. Burl;P. Perona

  • Magnetic resonance properties of hydrogen: imaging the posterior fossa

    IR Young;M Burl;GJ Clarke;AS Hall

  • AEGIS Automated Science Targeting for the MER Opportunity Rover

    Tara A. Estlin;Benjamin J. Bornstein;Daniel M. Gaines;Robert C. Anderson

  • Learning to Recognize Volcanoes on Venus

    Michael C. Burl;Lars Asker;Padhraic Smyth;Usama Fayyad

  • TRATAMIENTO DE IMAGENES DE VIDEO.

    Burl Michael;Thomson Roderick;Layton Phillip

  • AEGIS autonomous targeting for ChemCam on Mars Science Laboratory: Deployment and results of initial science team use.

    Raymond Francis;Tara A. Estlin;Gary Doran;Stephen Johnstone

  • Learning to Detect Small Impact Craters

    P.G. Wetzler;R. Honda;B. Enke;W.J. Merline

  • Optimal Processing of Polarimetric Synthetic-Aperture Radar Imagery

    L. M. Novak;M. C. Burl;R. D. Chaney;G. J. Owirka

  • Assessing the ability to predict human percepts of odor quality from the detector responses of a conducting polymer composite-based electronic nose

    Michael C. Burl;Brett J. Doleman;Amanda Schaffer;Amanda Schaffer;Nathan S. Lewis

  • Tuned fiducial markers to identify body locations with minimal perturbation of tissue magnetization

    Unknown

  • Automated detection of craters and other geological features

    M. C. Burl;T. Stough;W. Colwell;E. B. Bierhaus

  • Probabilistic affine invariants for recognition

    T.K. Leung;M.C. Burl;P. Perona

  • Texture discrimination in synthetic aperture radar imagery

    M.C. Burl;G.J. Owirka;L.M. Novak

  • Classification performance of carbon black-polymer composite vapor detector arrays as a function of array size and detector composition

    Michael C. Burl;Brian C. Sisk;Thomas P. Vaid;Nathan Saul Lewis

  • Autonomous Science on the EO-1 Mission

    S. Chien;R. Sherwood;D. Tran;R. Castano

Frequent Co-Authors

Pietro Perona
Pietro Perona California Institute of Technology
Robert C. Anderson
Robert C. Anderson California Institute of Technology
Padhraic Smyth
Padhraic Smyth University of California, Irvine
Steve Chien
Steve Chien Jet Propulsion Lab
Usama M. Fayyad
Usama M. Fayyad Open Insights
Rob Sherwood
Rob Sherwood Jet Propulsion Lab
Roger C. Wiens
Roger C. Wiens Los Alamos National Laboratory
Nathan S. Lewis
Nathan S. Lewis California Institute of Technology
Victor R. Baker
Victor R. Baker University of Arizona
Diana L. Blaney
Diana L. Blaney Jet Propulsion Lab

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens many doors, both in terms of related online degrees and career opportunities. For those inspired by technology’s impact on the environment, you might wonder, what can I do with an environmental science degree? This interdisciplinary approach can lead to roles in sustainability, research, and data analysis.

If accelerating your education is a priority, consider enrolling in a fast track computer science degree. These online programs let you graduate sooner, saving time and launching your career faster.

Engineering is another closely related pathway. For those interested in combining science and technology, an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering program can help you address global challenges using technical expertise.

Cost is a major consideration when choosing a degree. If you’re interested in engineering, evaluating the mechanical engineering degree cost can help you make an informed decision without breaking the bank.

Best Scientists Citing Michael C. Burl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles