World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
6045
World Ranking
12968
National Ranking
5233

Michael C. Burl publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael C. Burl sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 100 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael C. Burl D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael C. Burl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael C. Burl is affiliated with the Jet Propulsion Lab in the United States, a research institution known for its involvement in space exploration and technology development.

The available data does not list specific recent papers authored by Michael C. Burl.

There are no documented frequent co-authors associated with their research collaborations.

No information is provided on regular publication venues for their work.

The record does not show any book publications linked to this scientist.

Details regarding main fields of study, subfields of study, and principal research topics are not specified.

There is no information about awards received by Michael C. Burl.

The scientist is currently living.

Best Publications

  • Finding faces in cluttered scenes using random labeled graph matching

    T.K. Leung;M.C. Burl;P. Perona

  • Optimal speckle reduction in polarimetric SAR imagery

    L.M. Novak;M.C. Burl

  • Optimal polarimetric processing for enhanced target detection

    L.M. Novak;M.C. Burl;W.W. Irving

  • A Probabilistic Approach to Object Recognition Using Local Photometry and Global Geometry

    Michael C. Burl;Markus Weber;Pietro Perona;Pietro Perona

  • Inferring Ground Truth from Subjective Labelling of Venus Images

    Padhraic Smyth;Usama M. Fayyad;Michael C. Burl;Pietro Perona

  • Initial clinical evaluation of a whole body nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tomograph.

    Young Ir;Bailes Dr;Burl M;Collins Ag

  • Entropy-based active learning for object recognition

    A. Holub;P. Perona;M.C. Burl

  • Systems and methods for the automated sensing of motion in a mobile robot using visual data

    Michael Christopher Burl;Paolo Pirjanian

  • IMAGING OF THE BRAIN BY NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE

    F.H. Doyle;J.M. Pennock;J.S. Orr;J.C. Gore

  • IMAGING OF THE BRAIN BY NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE

    F. H. Doyle;J. M. Pennock;J. S. Orr;J. C. Gore

  • Recognition of planar object classes

    M.C. Burl;P. Perona

  • Magnetic resonance properties of hydrogen: imaging the posterior fossa

    IR Young;M Burl;GJ Clarke;AS Hall

  • AEGIS Automated Science Targeting for the MER Opportunity Rover

    Tara A. Estlin;Benjamin J. Bornstein;Daniel M. Gaines;Robert C. Anderson

  • Learning to Recognize Volcanoes on Venus

    Michael C. Burl;Lars Asker;Padhraic Smyth;Usama Fayyad

  • TRATAMIENTO DE IMAGENES DE VIDEO.

    Burl Michael;Thomson Roderick;Layton Phillip

  • AEGIS autonomous targeting for ChemCam on Mars Science Laboratory: Deployment and results of initial science team use.

    Raymond Francis;Tara A. Estlin;Gary Doran;Stephen Johnstone

  • Learning to Detect Small Impact Craters

    P.G. Wetzler;R. Honda;B. Enke;W.J. Merline

  • Optimal Processing of Polarimetric Synthetic-Aperture Radar Imagery

    L. M. Novak;M. C. Burl;R. D. Chaney;G. J. Owirka

  • Assessing the ability to predict human percepts of odor quality from the detector responses of a conducting polymer composite-based electronic nose

    Michael C. Burl;Brett J. Doleman;Amanda Schaffer;Amanda Schaffer;Nathan S. Lewis

  • Tuned fiducial markers to identify body locations with minimal perturbation of tissue magnetization

    Unknown

  • Automated detection of craters and other geological features

    M. C. Burl;T. Stough;W. Colwell;E. B. Bierhaus

  • Probabilistic affine invariants for recognition

    T.K. Leung;M.C. Burl;P. Perona

  • Texture discrimination in synthetic aperture radar imagery

    M.C. Burl;G.J. Owirka;L.M. Novak

  • Classification performance of carbon black-polymer composite vapor detector arrays as a function of array size and detector composition

    Michael C. Burl;Brian C. Sisk;Thomas P. Vaid;Nathan Saul Lewis

  • Autonomous Science on the EO-1 Mission

    S. Chien;R. Sherwood;D. Tran;R. Castano

Frequent Co-Authors

Pietro Perona
Pietro Perona California Institute of Technology
Robert C. Anderson
Robert C. Anderson California Institute of Technology
Padhraic Smyth
Padhraic Smyth University of California, Irvine
Steve Chien
Steve Chien Jet Propulsion Lab
Usama M. Fayyad
Usama M. Fayyad Open Insights
Rob Sherwood
Rob Sherwood Jet Propulsion Lab
Roger C. Wiens
Roger C. Wiens Los Alamos National Laboratory
Nathan S. Lewis
Nathan S. Lewis California Institute of Technology
Victor R. Baker
Victor R. Baker University of Arizona
Diana L. Blaney
Diana L. Blaney Jet Propulsion Lab

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens many doors, both in terms of related online degrees and career opportunities. For those inspired by technology’s impact on the environment, you might wonder, what can I do with an environmental science degree? This interdisciplinary approach can lead to roles in sustainability, research, and data analysis.

If accelerating your education is a priority, consider enrolling in a fast track computer science degree. These online programs let you graduate sooner, saving time and launching your career faster.

Engineering is another closely related pathway. For those interested in combining science and technology, an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering program can help you address global challenges using technical expertise.

Cost is a major consideration when choosing a degree. If you’re interested in engineering, evaluating the mechanical engineering degree cost can help you make an informed decision without breaking the bank.

Best Scientists Citing Michael C. Burl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles