World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
UK
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 82 926 895 45 45 319 49719

Timothy F. Cootes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Timothy F. Cootes between 1990 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Timothy F. Cootes published across 32 years, from 1990 to 2021, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2006. 33 of the 351 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2006. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 15 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 18 publications
1990 2021

351 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Timothy F. Cootes: publications per year, 1990 to 2021
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 2
1992 8
1993 7
1994 15
1995 17
1996 9
1997 6
1998 12
1999 16
2000 10
2001 10
2002 16
2003 6
2004 11
2005 7
2006 19
2007 11
2008 6
2009 6
2010 15
2011 8
2012 16
2013 12
2014 13
2015 12
2016 16
2017 11
2018 10
2019 10
2020 15
2021 18
Total 351
Download as CSV

Timothy F. Cootes publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy F. Cootes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 312–321 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 319 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238 319
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Timothy F. Cootes D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy F. Cootes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113 82
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2012 - Fellow of the International Association for Pattern Recognition (IAPR) For contributions to the development of statistical models of shape and appearance.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Statistics
  • Computer vision

His scientific interests lie mostly in Artificial intelligence, Active appearance model, Computer vision, Active shape model and Pattern recognition. His Active appearance model study which covers Robustness that intersects with Statistical shape analysis and Iterative refinement. His Computer vision research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Range and Pattern recognition.

His work carried out in the field of Active shape model brings together such families of science as Active contour model, Point distribution model, Statistical model, Algorithm and Point. The Statistical model study combines topics in areas such as Matching and Image segmentation. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Orientation, Pixel, Regression and Blossom algorithm.

His most cited work include:

  • Active shape models—their training and application (6586 citations)
  • Active appearance models (4896 citations)
  • Active Appearance Models (1617 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Pattern recognition, Active appearance model and Image. In general Artificial intelligence, his work in Active shape model, Statistical model, Face and Facial recognition system is often linked to Set linking many areas of study. His biological study deals with issues like Algorithm, which deal with fields such as Shape analysis.

His Computer vision study frequently involves adjacent topics like Pattern recognition. The study incorporates disciplines such as Object, Pixel, Random forest and Matching in addition to Pattern recognition. His Active appearance model research includes themes of Image texture, Matching and Vertebra.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (65.77%)
  • Computer vision (38.74%)
  • Pattern recognition (35.44%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Artificial intelligence (65.77%)
  • Radiography (8.71%)
  • Random forest (8.71%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Timothy F. Cootes mostly deals with Artificial intelligence, Radiography, Random forest, Pattern recognition and Orthodontics. The concepts of his Artificial intelligence study are interwoven with issues in Machine learning and Computer vision. His Radiography research incorporates elements of Physical therapy, Wrist and Computer-aided diagnosis.

His Random forest study incorporates themes from Backpropagation, False positive paradox and Cohen's kappa. His work deals with themes such as Image, CAD and Computed tomography, which intersect with Pattern recognition. His studies in Orthodontics integrate themes in fields like Cross-sectional study, Connection and Hip pain.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Overview of research on facial ageing using the FG-NET ageing database (136 citations)
  • A benchmark for comparison of dental radiography analysis algorithms (112 citations)
  • Synovial tissue volume: a treatment target in knee osteoarthritis (OA) (56 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Statistics
  • Computer vision

Radiography, Artificial intelligence, Random forest, Fully automatic and Pattern recognition are his primary areas of study. Timothy F. Cootes has researched Radiography in several fields, including Algorithm, Physical therapy and Wrist. His Artificial intelligence research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Node and Computer vision.

Timothy F. Cootes is involved in the study of Computer vision that focuses on Image in particular. His Random forest research incorporates elements of Tree, Sample, Binary decision diagram and Decision tree. His studies in Pattern recognition integrate themes in fields like Coronal plane and Maximally stable extremal regions.

Best Publications

  • Active shape models—their training and application

    T. F. Cootes;C. J. Taylor;D. H. Cooper;J. Graham

  • Active appearance models

    T.F. Cootes;G.J. Edwards;C.J. Taylor

  • Active Appearance Models

    Timothy F. Cootes;Gareth J. Edwards;Christopher J. Taylor

  • Use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images

    Timothy F. Cootes;Andrew Hill;Christopher J. Taylor;J. Haslam

  • Active shape models - 'Smart Snakes'.

    Timothy F. Cootes;Christopher J. Taylor

  • Toward automatic simulation of aging effects on face images

    A. Lanitis;C.J. Taylor;T.F. Cootes

  • Automatic interpretation and coding of face images using flexible models

    A. Lanitis;C.J. Taylor;T.F. Cootes

  • Feature Detection and Tracking with Constrained Local Models

    David Cristinacce;Timothy F. Cootes

  • Training Models of Shape from Sets of Examples

    Timothy F. Cootes;Christopher J. Taylor;David H. Cooper;Jim Graham

  • Interpreting face images using active appearance models

    G.J. Edwards;C.J. Taylor;T.F. Cootes

  • A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling

    R.H. Davies;C.J. Twining;T.F. Cootes;J.C. Waterton

  • Extraction of visual features for lipreading

    I. Matthews;T.F. Cootes;J.A. Bangham;S. Cox

  • Automatic face identification system using flexible appearance models

    Andreas Lanitis;Christopher J. Taylor;Timothy F. Cootes

  • View-based active appearance models

    Timothy F. Cootes;Gavin V. Wheeler;Kevin N. Walker;Christopher J. Taylor

  • Statistical models of appearance for medical image analysis and computer vision

    Timothy F. Cootes;Christopher J. Taylor

  • Automatic feature localisation with constrained local models

    David Cristinacce;Tim Cootes

  • Face Recognition Using Active Appearance Models

    Gareth J. Edwards;Timothy F. Cootes;Christopher J. Taylor

  • View-based active appearance models

    T.F. Cootes;K. Walker;C.J. Taylor

  • Active Shape Models - 'smart snakes'

    Unknown

  • A mixture model for representing shape variation

    Timothy F. Cootes;Christopher J. Taylor

  • The Use of Active Shape Models for Locating Structures in Medical Images

    Timothy F. Cootes;A. Hill;Christopher J. Taylor;J. Haslam

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher J. Taylor
Christopher J. Taylor Atkins (United Kingdom)
David T. Felson
David T. Felson Boston University
Judith E. Adams
Judith E. Adams University of Manchester
Terence W. O'Neill
Terence W. O'Neill University of Manchester
Mark Jenkinson
Mark Jenkinson University of Oxford
Daniel Rueckert
Daniel Rueckert Technical University of Munich
Geoff J.M. Parker
Geoff J.M. Parker University College London
Karl E. Kadler
Karl E. Kadler University of Manchester
David N. Kennedy
David N. Kennedy University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Stephen M. Smith
Stephen M. Smith University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens up a variety of related online degrees and streamlined career pathways. For students seeking a specialized route, an ideal option is to follow a data science learning path. This path equips learners with essential analytical and technical skills highly valued by employers.

If you are interested in broadening your expertise, there are several excellent online electrical engineering courses USA offers, providing a flexible way to learn foundational and advanced concepts without leaving your home.

For those seeking a faster entry into the tech workforce, consider 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These options allow students to quickly acquire marketable skills and increase their earning potential.

Finally, students looking to advance their education affordably should explore the quickest cheapest masters degree programs available online. These programs offer an efficient way to gain advanced knowledge and boost your career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy F. Cootes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles