World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christopher J. Taylor

Christopher J. Taylor

Award Badge
Computer Science
UK
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
84
Citations
49757
World Ranking
823
National Ranking
41

Christopher J. Taylor publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher J. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 458 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Christopher J. Taylor D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher J. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Christopher J. Taylor is affiliated with Atkins in the United Kingdom and engages primarily in research within the fields of Medicine and Environmental Science.

The scientist's work spans several specialized subfields, including Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Surgery.

Key research topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases

Christopher J. Taylor has contributed to several recent papers, notable for their focus on ecological and environmental challenges as well as epidemiological methods. Examples include:

  • New spatial analyses of Australian wildfires highlight the need for new fire, resource, and conservation policies (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Recent Australian wildfires made worse by logging and associated forest management (2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution)
  • The response of arboreal marsupials to long-term changes in forest disturbance (2020, Animal Conservation)
  • Understanding and responding to COVID-19 in Wales: protocol for a privacy-protecting data platform for enhanced epidemiology and evaluation of interventions (2020, BMJ Open)
  • Defect Detection and Classification by Training a Generic Convolutional Neural Network Encoder (2020, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing)

Frequent collaborators include David B. Lindenmayer, Ariane L. Herrick, Andrea Murray, Graham Dinsdale, and Joanne Manning, with whom Taylor has coauthored multiple publications.

Christopher J. Taylor's research has been published in a variety of academic venues. Most frequently, these include:

  • Lara D. Veeken
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Austral Ecology
  • Pacific Conservation Biology
  • Trials

Best Publications

  • Active shape models—their training and application

    T. F. Cootes;C. J. Taylor;D. H. Cooper;J. Graham

  • Active appearance models

    T.F. Cootes;G.J. Edwards;C.J. Taylor

  • Active Appearance Models

    Timothy F. Cootes;Gareth J. Edwards;Christopher J. Taylor

  • Use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images

    Timothy F. Cootes;Andrew Hill;Christopher J. Taylor;J. Haslam

  • Active shape models - 'Smart Snakes'.

    Timothy F. Cootes;Christopher J. Taylor

  • Toward automatic simulation of aging effects on face images

    A. Lanitis;C.J. Taylor;T.F. Cootes

  • Automatic interpretation and coding of face images using flexible models

    A. Lanitis;C.J. Taylor;T.F. Cootes

  • Training Models of Shape from Sets of Examples

    Timothy F. Cootes;Christopher J. Taylor;David H. Cooper;Jim Graham

  • Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention

    G Z Yang;D Hawkes;D Rueckert;J A Noble

  • Interpreting face images using active appearance models

    G.J. Edwards;C.J. Taylor;T.F. Cootes

  • A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling

    R.H. Davies;C.J. Twining;T.F. Cootes;J.C. Waterton

  • Automatic face identification system using flexible appearance models

    Andreas Lanitis;Christopher J. Taylor;Timothy F. Cootes

  • View-based active appearance models

    Timothy F. Cootes;Gavin V. Wheeler;Kevin N. Walker;Christopher J. Taylor

  • Statistical models of appearance for medical image analysis and computer vision

    Timothy F. Cootes;Christopher J. Taylor

  • Face Recognition Using Active Appearance Models

    Gareth J. Edwards;Timothy F. Cootes;Christopher J. Taylor

  • View-based active appearance models

    T.F. Cootes;K. Walker;C.J. Taylor

  • Active Shape Models - 'smart snakes'

    Unknown

  • A mixture model for representing shape variation

    Timothy F. Cootes;Christopher J. Taylor

  • Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI’99

    Chris Taylor;Alain Colchester

  • Evaluation of 3D correspondence methods for model building.

    Martin A. Styner;Kumar T. Rajamani;Lutz-Peter Nolte;Gabriel Zsemlye

  • The Use of Active Shape Models for Locating Structures in Medical Images

    Timothy F. Cootes;A. Hill;Christopher J. Taylor;J. Haslam

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy F. Cootes
Timothy F. Cootes University of Manchester
Ariane L. Herrick
Ariane L. Herrick University of Manchester
Thomas N. Williams
Thomas N. Williams Imperial College London
Dimitri M. Kullmann
Dimitri M. Kullmann University College London
Maurizio Cutolo
Maurizio Cutolo University of Genoa
John Allen
John Allen Coventry University
Judith E. Adams
Judith E. Adams University of Manchester
Alan Jackson
Alan Jackson Arizona State University
David J. Hawkes
David J. Hawkes University College London
Geoff J.M. Parker
Geoff J.M. Parker University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science doesn’t have to follow a single path. Many students start with an online associate's degree for a quick, affordable entry into the field. These programs offer foundational knowledge and can help you launch a career or transfer to a bachelor’s program.

For those aiming to boost their credentials quickly, there are also shortest masters degree programs online. These accelerated options allow you to earn a graduate degree in less time, helping you advance faster in your career.

When considering postgraduate study, it’s important to target graduate degrees that are worth it. Specializations like data science, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity are in high demand, offering great potential for growth and lucrative job opportunities.

Affordability matters, too. A smart way to balance cost and quality is to look at affordable online colleges. Many institutions offer respected Computer Science programs at accessible tuition rates, making it easier to achieve your academic and career goals without excess debt.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher J. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles