World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Usama M. Fayyad

Usama M. Fayyad

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
63
Citations
43021
World Ranking
2669
National Ranking
1325

Usama M. Fayyad publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Usama M. Fayyad sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 171 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Usama M. Fayyad D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Usama M. Fayyad sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - ACM Fellow For contributions to machine learning, data mining and knowledge discovery.
  • 2005 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For significant research contributions to machine learning, data mining and KDD, exceptional service in founding a new AI subfield/community, and for successfully fielding and commercializing AI and KDD technologies.

Overview

Usama M. Fayyad is affiliated with Open Insights in the United States. Their research spans several areas within computer science, focusing particularly on management information systems, artificial intelligence, health informatics, safety research, and management science and operations research.

The scientist has contributed to multiple main topics, including:

  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Big Data Technologies and Applications
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification

Fayyad's recent publications include the following papers:

  • Analytics and Data Science Standardization and Assessment Framework, 2020, Harvard Data Science Review
  • From Stochastic Parrots to Intelligent Assistants-The Secrets of Data and Human Interventions, 2023, IEEE Intelligent Systems
  • From Unicorn Data Scientist to Key Roles in Data Science: Standardizing Roles, 2022, Harvard Data Science Review
  • How Can We Train Data Scientists When We Can't Agree on Who They Are?, 2021, Harvard Data Science Review

They have also co-authored with several frequent collaborators:

  • Hamit Hamutcu
  • Padhraic Smyth
  • Jia Li
  • Guang Cheng
  • Ranjan Maitra

Publication venues that frequently feature their work include:

  • Harvard Data Science Review
  • IEEE Intelligent Systems
  • Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal
  • Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

In addition to journal articles, Usama M. Fayyad has contributed a book published by Springer Science+Business Media titled Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2021).

Awards received by the scientist include:

  • ACM Fellow (2006) for contributions to machine learning, data mining and knowledge discovery
  • Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2005) for significant research contributions to machine learning, data mining and KDD, exceptional service in founding a new AI subfield/community, and commercialization of AI and KDD technologies

Best Publications

  • From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in Databases

    Usama M. Fayyad;Gregory Piatetsky-Shapiro;Padhraic Smyth

  • Multi-Interval Discretization of Continuous-Valued Attributes for Classification Learning

    Usama M. Fayyad;Keki B. Irani

  • The KDD process for extracting useful knowledge from volumes of data

    Usama Fayyad;Gregory Piatetsky-Shapiro;Padhraic Smyth

  • From data mining to knowledge discovery: an overview

    Usama M. Fayyad;Gregory Piatetsky-Shapiro;Padhraic Smyth

  • Refining Initial Points for K-Means Clustering

    Paul S. Bradley;Usama M. Fayyad

  • Knowledge discovery and data mining: towards a unifying framework

    Usama Fayyad;Gregory Piatetsky-Shapiro;Padhraic Smyth

  • On the Handling of Continuous-Valued Attributes in Decision Tree Generation

    Usama M. Fayyad;Keki B. Irani

  • Scaling clustering algorithms to large databases

    P. S. Bradley;Usama Fayyad;Cory Reina

  • Information Visualization in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery

    Usama Fayyad;Georges G. Grinstein;Andreas Wierse

  • Hierarchical Clustering Algorithms for Document Datasets

    Ying Zhao;George Karypis;Usama Fayyad

  • Data mining and knowledge discovery in databases

    Usama Fayyad;Ramasamy Uthurusamy

  • Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

    Evangelos Simoudis;Jiawei Han;Usama Fayyad

  • Inferring Ground Truth from Subjective Labelling of Venus Images

    Padhraic Smyth;Usama M. Fayyad;Michael C. Burl;Pietro Perona

  • Mathematical Programming for Data Mining: Formulations and Challenges

    P. S. Bradley;Usama M. Fayyad;O. L. Mangasarian

  • Evolving data into mining solutions for insights

    Usama Fayyad;Ramasamy Uthurusamy

  • The attribute selection problem in decision tree generation

    Usama M. Fayyad;Keki B. Irani

  • Data mining and KDD: promise and challenges

    Usama Fayyad;Paul Stolorz

  • Initialization of iterative refinement clustering algorithms

    Usama Fayyad;Cory Reina;P. S. Bradley

  • Mining scientific data

    Usama Fayyad;David Haussler;Paul Stolorz

  • On the handling of continuous-valued attributes in decision tree generation

    Unknown

  • Knowledge discovery in databases: An overview

    Usama Fayyad

  • The KDD process for extracting useful knowledge from volumes of data : Data mining and knowledge discovery in databases

    U. Fayyad;G. Piatetsky-Shapiro;P. Smyth

Frequent Co-Authors

Padhraic Smyth
Padhraic Smyth University of California, Irvine
S. G. Djorgovski
S. G. Djorgovski California Institute of Technology
Surajit Chaudhuri
Surajit Chaudhuri Microsoft (United States)
Michael C. Burl
Michael C. Burl Jet Propulsion Lab
Pietro Perona
Pietro Perona California Institute of Technology
Alexander G. Gray
Alexander G. Gray Georgia Institute of Technology
Andrew Tomkins
Andrew Tomkins Google (United States)
David Haussler
David Haussler University of California, Santa Cruz
Jiawei Han
Jiawei Han University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
John E. Laird
John E. Laird University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Computer Science opens up a variety of career pathways and possibilities. Many students are interested in short careers that pay well, making accelerated or specialized programs appealing for those seeking quick workforce entry and strong earning potential.

Budget-conscious learners often look for affordable degree options. For those interested in cutting-edge fields, there are various cheapest online masters in artificial intelligence that combine cost-effectiveness with high-demand AI expertise.

Choosing the right major can shape future opportunities. Some of the top degrees for the future include technology, data science, and engineering—all highly relevant to Computer Science students considering online study options.

If balancing school with work or other responsibilities is important, learners may consider programs recognized as some of the easy masters programs. These can offer flexibility and manageable coursework while still advancing career goals in tech and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Usama M. Fayyad

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles