World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 49 5974 5805 357 353 101 7752

Ronald Martinez publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ronald Martinez between 1998 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ronald Martinez published across 22 years, from 1998 to 2019, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2007. 2 of the 122 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2007. 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 45 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications
1998 2019

122 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ronald Martinez: publications per year, 1998 to 2019
Year Publications
1998 2
1999 2
2000 3
2001 2
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 3
2006 11
2007 45
2008 22
2009 16
2010 3
2011 1
2012 0
2013 4
2014 2
2015 1
2016 0
2017 2
2018 0
2019 2
Total 122
Download as CSV

Ronald Martinez publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald Martinez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 92–101 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 101 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421 101
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Ronald Martinez D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald Martinez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543 49
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • The Internet
  • World Wide Web
  • Computer network

World Wide Web, Multimedia, Information retrieval, Computer security and Presentation are his primary areas of study. As part of his studies on World Wide Web, Ronald Martinez often connects relevant subjects like Live video. Ronald Martinez interconnects Metadata, Data mining and Index in the investigation of issues within Information retrieval.

His Metadata research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Space, Mobile device and Program code. His Computer security study incorporates themes from Credit card, Logical data model and Uniform resource identifier. Ronald Martinez combines subjects such as End user, Electronic media, Human–computer interaction and Output device with his study of Presentation.

His most cited work include:

  • Smart electronic receipt system (469 citations)
  • Virtual property system (392 citations)
  • Methods, systems and apparatus for delivery of media (268 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Ronald Martinez mainly focuses on World Wide Web, Multimedia, Information retrieval, Object and Presentation. In general World Wide Web, his work in Web service and Web page is often linked to Association, Container and Composite media linking many areas of study. His studies in Multimedia integrate themes in fields like Internet based and Human–computer interaction.

His Information retrieval research integrates issues from Metadata and Data mining. His work on Temporal database as part of general Data mining research is frequently linked to Geography and Spatial analysis, bridging the gap between disciplines. His research investigates the link between Presentation and topics such as User profile that cross with problems in Output device.

He most often published in these fields:

  • World Wide Web (37.72%)
  • Multimedia (28.95%)
  • Information retrieval (24.56%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2009-2019)?

  • World Wide Web (37.72%)
  • Information retrieval (24.56%)
  • Presentation (11.40%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Ronald Martinez mainly investigates World Wide Web, Information retrieval, Presentation, Monetization and Content. Ronald Martinez has included themes like Telecommunications network, Multimedia and Service in his World Wide Web study. The study incorporates disciplines such as User profile and Social network in addition to Multimedia.

His User profile research focuses on subjects like Temporal database, which are linked to Data modeling. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Web page and Relation. His research in Presentation intersects with topics in Data as a service, Web service and Collaborative knowledge.

Between 2009 and 2019, his most popular works were:

  • Distributed live multimedia switching mechanism and network (109 citations)
  • Conditional incentive presentation, tracking and redemption (77 citations)
  • System and method for modeling relationships between entities (59 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • The Internet
  • World Wide Web
  • Computer network

His primary scientific interests are in World Wide Web, Multimedia, Presentation, Spatial analysis and Temporal database. In general World Wide Web study, his work on User profile and Social network often relates to the realm of Mechanism and Multi-frequency network, thereby connecting several areas of interest. His Presentation study combines topics in areas such as Computer security and User device.

His Spatial analysis investigation overlaps with other areas such as Graph, Logical data model, Data mining, Personalization and Data management. His research ties Data modeling and Temporal database together.

Best Publications

  • Virtual property system

    Ronald Martinez;Bruce Schneier;Greg Guerin

  • Smart electronic receipt system

    Gary Herman;Theodore Charles Goldstein;Ronald G. Martinez

  • Methods, systems and apparatus for delivery of media

    Ronald Martinez;Marc Davis

  • Techniques for input recogniton and completion

    Marc Eliot Davis;Joseph O'Sullivan;Christopher Todd Paretti;Ronald Martinez

  • User-generated activity maps

    Athellina R.A. Athsani;Ron Martinez;Chris T. Kalaboukis;Marc Davis

  • Personal data platform

    Chris Kalaboukis;Christopher William Higgins;Marc Eliot Davis;Ronald Martinez

  • Media object metadata engine configured to determine relationships between persons and brands

    Christopher Higgins;Marc E. Davis;Ronald Martinez;Joseph O'Sullivan

  • Distributed live multimedia switching mechanism and network

    Marc Davis;Joseph O'Sullivan;Chris W. Higgins;Ron Martinez

  • Trusted agent for electronic commerce

    Theodore C. Goldstein;Ronald G. Martinez;Paul D. Rubin

  • System, method and computer-readable storage medium for url based query for retrieving data related to a context

    Ronald Martinez;Christopher William Higgins;Joseph James O'sullivan;Marc Eliot Davis

  • System and method for conditional delivery of messages

    Marc Eliot Davis;Marco Boerries;Christopher Williams Higgins;Joseph James O'Sullivan

  • Systems and methods for augmenting digital content

    Athsani Athellina;Higgins Chris;O'sullivan Joseph;Davis Marc

  • Method, computer readable storage medium, and computing systems of method of presenting results of a web page query

    Martinez Ronald;Davis Marc Eliot;Higgins Christopher William;O'sullivan Joseph James

  • System and method for distributing media related to a location

    Ronald Martinez;Marc Eliot Davis;Michael Spiegelman;Christopher T. Paretti

  • System and method for location based media delivery

    Christopher W. Higgins;Christopher T. Paretti;Nicola Stefano Ghezzi;Michael Spiegelman

  • System and method for prioritizing delivery of communications via different communication channels

    Marc Eliot Davis;Bradley Joseph Horowitz;Marco Boerries;Christopher William Higgins

  • System and method for context enhanced mapping within a user interface

    Athellina Athsani;Christopher T. Paretti;Joseph James O'Sullivan;Ronald Martinez

  • System and method for improved mapping and routing

    Christopher William Higgins;Marc Eliot Davis;Ronald Martinez;Joseph James O'sullivan

  • System and method for context enhanced messaging

    Ronald Martinez;Marc Eliot Davis;Michael Spiegelman;Christopher T. Paretti

  • Optimization framework for association of advertisements with sequential media

    Oliver M. Raskin;Marc E. Davis;Eric M. Fixler;Ronald G. Martinez

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Davis
Marc Davis Microsoft (United States)
Christopher William Higgins
Christopher William Higgins Yahoo (United Kingdom)
Chris Kalaboukis
Chris Kalaboukis Yahoo (United Kingdom)
Joseph O'Sullivan
Joseph O'Sullivan Wells Fargo (United States)
Athellina Athsani
Athellina Athsani Yahoo (United Kingdom)
Elizabeth F. Churchill
Elizabeth F. Churchill Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a broad range of online degrees and career pathways. Beyond traditional four-year programs, accelerated options are also available. If you are looking to advance quickly, you may want to consider what degree can i get online in 6 months to jumpstart your career or transfer credits toward a higher degree.

Many prospective students compare costs before enrolling. Understanding how much does it cost to get a business degree online can help you plan financially for your education, especially if you consider combining computer science with business for greater versatility.

Affordability is a key factor for most learners. There are plenty of affordable online bachelor degree programs that provide quality education without breaking the bank.

For those interested in technical and engineering roles, an online engineering degree can be a flexible and cost-effective way to build specialized skills and prepare for in-demand professions in computer and technology fields.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald Martinez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles