World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
70
Citations
14315
World Ranking
2556
National Ranking
1206

Ronald E. See publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald E. See sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 163 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ronald E. See D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald E. See sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronald E. See is affiliated with the Medical University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research spans several areas within neuroscience and biochemistry focused on understanding brain mechanisms and signaling pathways.

Their recent publications include the 2020 paper titled "Neural Substrates and Circuits of Drug Addiction" published in Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, and the 2021 article "Assessment of multiple salivary biomarkers during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment for major depression" in Psychiatry Research.

Frequent coauthors working alongside Ronald E. See include:

  • Matthew W. Feltenstein
  • Rita A. Fuchs
  • Branon Eusebio
  • David A. Agnew
  • Mark Heatwole

The scientist's work has been published primarily in the following venues:

  • Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine
  • Psychiatry Research

Ronald E. See's main fields of study are:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these fields, their subfields of study include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

The main research topics addressed in their publications feature:

  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Best Publications

  • The role of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, basolateral amygdala, and dorsal hippocampus in contextual reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats.

    Rita A Fuchs;K Allison Evans;Christopher C Ledford;Macon P Parker

  • The neurocircuitry of addiction: an overview.

    M W Feltenstein;R E See

  • Selective inactivation of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and the basolateral amygdala attenuates conditioned-cued reinstatement of extinguished cocaine-seeking behavior in rats.

    Joselyn McLaughlin;Ronald E. See

  • Lesions of the basolateral amygdala abolish the ability of drug associated cues to reinstate responding during withdrawal from self-administered cocaine

    William M Meil;Ronald E See

  • Different neural substrates mediate cocaine seeking after abstinence versus extinction training: a critical role for the dorsolateral caudate-putamen.

    Rita A. Fuchs;R. Kyle Branham;Ronald E. See

  • Dopamine, but not glutamate, receptor blockade in the basolateral amygdala attenuates conditioned reward in a rat model of relapse to cocaine-seeking behavior

    Ronald E. See;Paul J. Kruzich;Jeffrey W. Grimm

  • Differential involvement of the core and shell subregions of the nucleus accumbens in conditioned cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats.

    Rita A. Fuchs;K. Allison Evans;Macon C. Parker;Ronald E. See

  • Dissociation of Primary and Secondary Reward-Relevant Limbic Nuclei in an Animal Model of Relapse

    Jeffrey W Grimm;Ronald E See

  • Conditioned cued recovery of responding following prolonged withdrawal from self-administered cocaine in rats: an animal model of relapse.

    W.M. Meil;R.E. See

  • Orexin/hypocretin signaling at the orexin 1 receptor regulates cue-elicited cocaine-seeking.

    Rachel J. Smith;Ronald E. See;Gary Aston-Jones

  • Neural substrates of conditioned-cued relapse to drug-seeking behavior.

    Ronald E See

  • Basolateral amygdala inactivation abolishes conditioned stimulus- and heroin-induced reinstatement of extinguished heroin-seeking behavior in rats.

    Rita A. Fuchs;Ronald E. See

  • Drug Addiction, Relapse, and the Amygdala

    Ronald E. See;Rita A. Fuchs;Christopher C. Ledford;Joselyn McLAUGHLIN

  • Differential involvement of orbitofrontal cortex subregions in conditioned cue-induced and cocaine-primed reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats

    Rita A. Fuchs;K. Allison Evans;Macon P. Parker;Ronald E. See

  • A BDNF infusion into the medial prefrontal cortex suppresses cocaine seeking in rats.

    William J. Berglind;Ronald E. See;Rita A. Fuchs;Shannon M. Ghee

  • The neural circuitry underlying reinstatement of heroin-seeking behavior in an animal model of relapse.

    J.L. Rogers;S. Ghee;R.E. See

  • Neural substrates of cocaine-cue associations that trigger relapse.

    Ronald E. See

  • Reversing cocaine-induced synaptic potentiation provides enduring protection from relapse

    Khaled Moussawi;Wenhua Zhou;Haowei Shen;Carmela M. Reichel

  • Selective inactivation of the ventral hippocampus attenuates cue-induced and cocaine-primed reinstatement of drug-seeking in rats.

    Jason L. Rogers;Ronald E. See

  • Potentiation of cocaine-primed reinstatement of drug seeking in female rats during estrus.

    Tod E. Kippin;Rita A. Fuchs;Ritu H. Mehta;Jordan M. Case

  • Differential contributions of the basolateral and central amygdala in the acquisition and expression of conditioned relapse to cocaine-seeking behavior.

    Paul J. Kruzich;Ronald E. See

Frequent Co-Authors

Jacqueline F. McGinty
Jacqueline F. McGinty Medical University of South Carolina
Peter W. Kalivas
Peter W. Kalivas Medical University of South Carolina
Gary Aston-Jones
Gary Aston-Jones Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Kathleen T. Brady
Kathleen T. Brady Medical University of South Carolina
Barbara A. Sorg
Barbara A. Sorg Washington State University Vancouver
Mark S. George
Mark S. George Medical University of South Carolina
John M. Roll
John M. Roll Washington State University
Robert Malcolm
Robert Malcolm Medical University of South Carolina
Xingbao Li
Xingbao Li Medical University of South Carolina
Patrick K. Randall
Patrick K. Randall Medical University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ronald E. See

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles