World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
24521
World Ranking
9300
National Ranking
630

Adam O. Horvath publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam O. Horvath sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 79 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Adam O. Horvath D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam O. Horvath sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adam O. Horvath is affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada and specializes in the field of Psychology, with a focus on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Language and Linguistics, and Aerospace Engineering.

Their research extensively covers topics such as Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications, Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics, Personality Disorders and Psychopathology, Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies, Psychological Testing and Assessment, and Mental Health Research Topics.

Horvath has published multiple research papers, with recent works including:

  • The reciprocal relationship between alliance and early treatment symptoms: A two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis, 2020, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Examining therapist effects in the alliance-outcome relationship: A multilevel meta-analysis, 2021, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Assessing the alliance-outcome association adjusted for patient characteristics and treatment processes: A meta-analytic summary of direct comparisons, 2020, Journal of Counseling Psychology
  • Getting to "Yes": Overcoming Client Reluctance to Engage in Chair Work, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • The evolution of patients' concept of the alliance and its relation to outcome: A dynamic latent-class structural equation modeling approach, 2021, Journal of Counseling Psychology

The venues where Horvath frequently publishes include:

  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Journal of Counseling Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Communication & Medicine
  • International Journal of Business and Management Invention

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations are:

  • Christoph Flückiger
  • Peter Muntigl
  • A. C. Del Re
  • Bruce E. Wampold
  • Julian Rubel

In addition to journal articles, Horvath has contributed to book publications. Notably, in 2024, they published "Innovative studies in organized helping: Transforming relations, emotions and referents through sequentially structured practices" with Frontiers Media.

Best Publications

  • Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory.

    Adam O. Horvath;Leslie S. Greenberg

  • Relation between Working Alliance and Outcome in Psychotherapy: A Meta-Analysis.

    Adam O. Horvath;B. Dianne Symonds

  • Alliance in individual psychotherapy.

    Adam O. Horvath;AC Del Re;Christoph Flückiger;Dianne B. Symonds

  • The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis.

    Christoph Flückiger;A. C. Del Re;Bruce E. Wampold;Adam O. Horvath

  • The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy.

    Adam O. Horvath;Lester Luborsky

  • The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice.

    Adam O. Horvath;Leslie S. Greenberg

  • How central is the alliance in psychotherapy? A multilevel longitudinal meta-analysis.

    Christoph Flückiger;A. C. Del Re;Bruce E. Wampold;Dianne Symonds

  • The development of the Working Alliance Inventory.

    Adam O. Horvath;Leslie S. Greenberg

  • The therapeutic relationship.

    Alexandra Bachelor;Adam Horvath

  • Therapist effects in the therapeutic alliance–outcome relationship: A restricted-maximum likelihood meta-analysis☆

    A.C. Del Re;Christoph Flückiger;Adam O. Horvath;Dianne Symonds

  • The therapeutic relationship : From transference to alliance

    Adam O. Horvath

  • The therapeutic relationship: Research and theory : An introduction to the Special Issue

    Adam O. Horvath

  • The alliance in context: Accomplishments, challenges, and future directions

    Adam O. Horvath

  • Empirical validation of Bordin's pantheoretical model of the alliance: The Working Alliance Inventory perspective.

    Adam O. Horvath

  • System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances: A Tool for Research and Practice.

    Myrna L. Friedlander;Valentín Escudero;Adam O. Horvath;Laurie Heatherington

  • Research on the alliance.

    Adam O. Horvath

  • The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models Methods and Findings

    A. O. Horvath

  • Optimizing the alliance in couple therapy.

    Dianne Symonds;Adam O. Horvath

  • How collaboration in therapy becomes therapeutic: the therapeutic collaboration coding system.

    Eugénia Ribeiro;António P. Ribeiro;Miguel M. Gonçalves;Adam O. Horvath

  • The reciprocal relationship between alliance and early treatment symptoms: A two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis.

    Christoph Flückiger;Julian Rubel;A. C. Del Re;Adam O. Horvath

  • Research on the alliance: Knowledge in search of a theory

    Adam O. Horvath

Frequent Co-Authors

Christoph Flückiger
Christoph Flückiger University of Kassel
Bruce E. Wampold
Bruce E. Wampold University of Wisconsin–Madison
Leslie S. Greenberg
Leslie S. Greenberg York University
William B. Stiles
William B. Stiles Miami University
Ronald W. Marx
Ronald W. Marx University of Arizona
Miguel M. Gonçalves
Miguel M. Gonçalves University of Minho
Lynne Angus
Lynne Angus York University
Lester Luborsky
Lester Luborsky University of Pennsylvania
Matthew P. Martens
Matthew P. Martens University of Missouri
Julian A. Rubel
Julian A. Rubel Osnabrück University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees have become increasingly popular, providing flexible study options for students across the USA. Cost is often a major consideration, and finding affordable programs is key. For those seeking undergraduate options, there are excellent resources highlighting the cheapest online psychology bachelor's in New York as well as the cheapest online psychology bachelor's in the South.

Beyond regional options, some cities boast particularly competitive programs. For instance, students may consider affordable online psychology bachelor's degrees in St. Louis, known for both value and academic strength. Furthermore, Georgia offers several highly ranked programs; explore the most affordable online psychology degree programs in Georgia for additional options.

Graduates typically pursue diverse paths, including counseling, human resources, social work, and continued study at the graduate level. Choosing the right degree—especially one that's affordable and flexible—can open the door to a rewarding and meaningful career in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Adam O. Horvath

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles