World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
65
Citations
14426
World Ranking
9191
National Ranking
4072

Jan Pohl publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Pohl sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 183 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jan Pohl D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Pohl sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Pohl is affiliated with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Immunology and Microbiology. Within these areas, key subfields of study include Immunology, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Infectious Diseases.

The main topics addressed in Jan Pohl's body of work cover:

  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Malaria Research and Control
  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Complement system in diseases
  • Respiratory viral infections research

Pohl has published in a variety of scientific venues, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • Journal of Virology
  • Science
  • Clinical Microbiology Reviews

Some notable recent papers of Jan Pohl include:

  • "Prevalent, protective, and convergent IgG recognition of SARS-CoV-2 non-RBD spike epitopes," 2021, Science
  • "Antiviral Approaches against Influenza Virus," 2023, Clinical Microbiology Reviews
  • "Analysis of the initial lot of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) real-time RT-PCR diagnostic panel," 2021, PLoS ONE
  • "Prevalent, protective, and convergent IgG recognition of SARS-CoV-2 non-RBD spike epitopes in COVID-19 convalescent plasma," 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Citrullination Alters the Antiviral and Immunomodulatory Activities of the Human Cathelicidin LL-37 During Rhinovirus Infection," 2020, Frontiers in Immunology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with peers including:

  • Suryaprakash Sambhara
  • Dhwani Batra
  • Shivaprakash Gangappa
  • Justin Lee
  • Pavel Svoboda

Best Publications

  • The neuron-specific protein PGP 9.5 is a ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase

    Keith D. Wilkinson;Keunmyoung Lee;Seema Deshpande;Penelope Duerksen-Hughes

  • Peptide-binding specificity of the molecular chaperone BiP.

    Gregory C. Flynn;Jan Pohl;Mark T. Flocco;James E. Rothman

  • Degradation of Human Antimicrobial Peptide LL-37 by Staphylococcus aureus-Derived Proteinases

    Magdalena Sieprawska-Lupa;Piotr Mydel;Katarzyna Krawczyk;Kinga Wójcik

  • Antiviral Activity and Increased Host Defense against Influenza Infection Elicited by the Human Cathelicidin LL-37

    Peter G. Barlow;Pavel Svoboda;Annie Mackellar;Anthony A. Nash

  • 14-3-3zeta binds a phosphorylated Raf peptide and an unphosphorylated peptide via its conserved amphipathic groove

    Carlo Petosa;Shane C. Masters;Laurie A. Bankston;Jan Pohl

  • Phosphorylation influences the translation state of FMRP-associated polyribosomes

    Stephanie Ceman;William T. O'Donnell;Matt Reed;Stephana Patton

  • Redox potential of human thioredoxin 1 and identification of a second dithiol/disulfide motif.

    Walter H. Watson;Jan Pohl;William R. Montfort;Olga Stuchlik

  • Prevalent, protective, and convergent IgG recognition of SARS-CoV-2 non-RBD spike epitopes.

    William N. Voss;Yixuan J. Hou;Nicole V. Johnson;George Delidakis

  • Antibiotic failure mediated by a resistant subpopulation in Enterobacter cloacae

    Victor I. Band;Emily K. Crispell;Brooke A. Napier;Carmen M. Herrera

  • Anticancer agents coupled to N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymers. I. Evaluation of daunomycin and puromycin conjugates in vitro

    R. Duncan;P. Kopecková-Rejmanová;J. Strohalm;I. Hume

  • Cationic Polypeptides Are Required for Antibacterial Activity of Human Airway Fluid

    Alexander M. Cole;Hsiang-I Liao;Olga Stuchlik;Jason Tilan

  • Human β-Defensin-1, a Potential Chromosome 8p Tumor Suppressor: Control of Transcription and Induction of Apoptosis in Renal Cell Carcinoma

    Carrie Q. Sun;Rebecca Arnold;Carina Fernandez-Golarz;Amanda B. Parrish

  • CAP37, a human neutrophil-derived chemotactic factor with monocyte specific activity

    H A Pereira;W M Shafer;J Pohl;L E Martin

  • Cationic Polypeptides Are Required for Anti-HIV-1 Activity of Human Vaginal Fluid

    Nitya Venkataraman;Amy L. Cole;Pavel Svoboda;Jan Pohl

  • Identification of specific sites in human P-glycoprotein phosphorylated by protein kinase C.

    T C Chambers;J Pohl;R L Raynor;J F Kuo

  • Analysis of HLA-E peptide-binding specificity and contact residues in bound peptide required for recognition by CD94/NKG2.

    Joseph D. Miller;Dominique A. Weber;Chris Ibegbu;Jan Pohl

  • Analysis of Qa-1(b) peptide binding specificity and the capacity of CD94/NKG2A to discriminate between Qa-1-peptide complexes.

    Jennifer R. Kraft;Russell E. Vance;Jan Pohl;Amy M. Martin

  • β2-Microglobulin Is a Signaling and Growth-Promoting Factor for Human Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis

    Wen Chin Huang;Daqing Wu;Zhihui Xie;Haiyen E. Zhau

  • Identification of the primary antimicrobial domains in human neutrophil cathepsin G.

    N Bangalore;J Travis;V C Onunka;J Pohl

  • Purification and Characterization of an Interleukin-1β-converting Enzyme Family Protease That Activates Cysteine Protease P32 (CPP32)

    Xuesong Liu;Caryn Naekyung Kim;Jan Pohl;Xiaodong Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

William M. Shafer
William M. Shafer Emory University
Dean P. Jones
Dean P. Jones Emory University
Alexander M. Cole
Alexander M. Cole University of Central Florida
Jan Potempa
Jan Potempa University of Louisville
David S. Stephens
David S. Stephens Emory University
Young-Mi Go
Young-Mi Go Emory University
Peter E. Jensen
Peter E. Jensen University of Utah
Jason M. Hansen
Jason M. Hansen Brigham Young University
Suryaprakash Sambhara
Suryaprakash Sambhara Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Robert I. Lehrer
Robert I. Lehrer University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jan Pohl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles