World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
25586
World Ranking
16572
National Ranking
182

Andreas Kjaer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Kjaer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 842 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Andreas Kjaer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Kjaer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andreas Kjaer is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant number of publications related to Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's work covers diverse topics, including:

  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Lung Cancer Research Studies
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Andreas Kjaer include:

  • Matthias M. Herth (45 publications)
  • R Ripa (45 publications)
  • Seppo W. Langer (41 publications)
  • Ulrich Knigge (38 publications)
  • Philip Hasbak (37 publications)

Predominant venues for publishing their research are:

  • Diagnostics (21 publications)
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine (19 publications)
  • Nuclear Medicine and Biology (15 publications)
  • Scientific Reports (13 publications)
  • Journal of Nuclear Cardiology (12 publications)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Andreas Kjaer include:

  • European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, 2023, Journal of Neuroendocrinology
  • Lipolysis drives expression of the constitutively active receptor GPR3 to induce adipose thermogenesis, 2021, Cell
  • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for SSTR PET: Imaging Neuroendocrine Tumors, 2023, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • 18F-FDG PET is Superior to WHO Grading as a Prognostic Tool in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Useful in Guiding PRRT: A Prospective 10-Year Follow-up Study, 2020, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT for Imaging Patients with Known or Suspected Somatostatin Receptor-Positive Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results of the First U.S. Prospective, Reader-Masked Clinical Trial, 2020, Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Best Publications

  • EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology

    B. Hesse;K. Tägil;A. Cuocolo;C. Anagnostopoulos

  • 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Predicts Survival of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

    Tina Binderup;Ulrich Knigge;Annika Loft;Birgitte Federspiel

  • Tumor volume in subcutaneous mouse xenografts measured by microCT is more accurate and reproducible than determined by 18F-FDG-microPET or external caliper

    Mette Munk Jensen;Jesper Tranekjær Jørgensen;Tina Binderup;Andreas Kjær

  • Hyperpolarized 13C MRI: Path to Clinical Translation in Oncology

    John Kurhanewicz;Daniel B Vigneron;Jan Henrik Ardenkjaer-Larsen;James A Bankson

  • Guideline for PET/CT imaging of neuroendocrine neoplasms with 68Ga-DOTA-conjugated somatostatin receptor targeting peptides and 18F–DOPA

    Murat Fani Bozkurt;Irene Virgolini;Sona Balogova;Sona Balogova;Mohsen Beheshti;Mohsen Beheshti

  • ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Radiological, Nuclear Medicine and Hybrid Imaging

    Anders Sundin;Rudolf Arnold;Eric Baudin;Jaroslaw Cwikla

  • Evaluation of right ventricular volume and function by 2D and 3D echocardiography compared to MRI.

    Jesper Kjaergaard;Claus Leth Petersen;Andreas Kjaer;Andreas Kjaer;Bente Krogsgaard Schaadt

  • Functional Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy, 123I-MIBG Scintigraphy, and 18F-FDG PET

    Tina Binderup;Ulrich Knigge;Annika Loft;Jann Mortensen

  • Positron Emission Tomography Based Elucidation of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect in Dogs with Cancer Using Copper-64 Liposomes.

    Anders E Hansen;Anncatrine L Petersen;Jonas R Henriksen;Betina Boerresen

  • Detection of Pulmonary Embolism with Combined Ventilation–Perfusion SPECT and Low-Dose CT: Head-to-Head Comparison with Multidetector CT Angiography

    Henrik Gutte;Jann Mortensen;Claus Verner Jensen;Camilla Bardram Johnbeck

  • EANM/ESC Guidelines for Radionuclide Imaging of Cardiac function

    B. Hesse;T. B. Lindhardt;W. Acampa;C. Anagnostopoulos

  • Effects of passive heating on central blood volume and ventricular dimensions in humans

    Craig G. Crandall;Craig G. Crandall;T. E. Wilson;J. Marving;T. W. Vogelsang

  • Serotonin receptors involved in vasopressin and oxytocin secretion

    H Jørgensen;M Riis;U Knigge;A Kjaer;A Kjaer

  • Combined PET/MR imaging in neurology: MR-based attenuation correction implies a strong spatial bias when ignoring bone

    Flemming Littrup Andersen;Claes Nøhr Ladefoged;Thomas Beyer;Sune Høgild Keller

  • PET tracers for somatostatin receptor imaging of neuroendocrine tumors: current status and review of the literature.

    Camilla Bardram Johnbeck;Ulrich Knigge;Andreas Kjær

  • Head-to-Head Comparison of 64Cu-DOTATATE and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT: A Prospective Study of 59 Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors.

    Camilla Bardram Johnbeck;Ulrich Knigge;Annika Loft;Anne Kiil Berthelsen

  • Effect of Liraglutide Treatment on Prediabetes and Overweight or Obesity in Clozapine- or Olanzapine-Treated Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Julie R. Larsen;Louise Vedtofte;Mathilde S. L. Jakobsen;Hans R. Jespersen

  • Clinical PET of Neuroendocrine Tumors Using 64Cu-DOTATATE: First-in-Humans Study

    Andreas Klaus Pfeifer;Ulrich Peter Knigge;Jann Mortensen;Peter Oturai

  • Heart failure and neuroendocrine activation: diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic perspectives.

    Andreas Kjær;Birger Hesse

  • Fever of unknown origin: prospective comparison of diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET and 111In-granulocyte scintigraphy.

    Andreas Kjaer;Anne-Mette Lebech;Annika Eigtved;Liselotte Højgaard

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Lars Andresen
Thomas Lars Andresen Technical University of Denmark
Peter Rossing
Peter Rossing University of Copenhagen
Jan Gerstoft
Jan Gerstoft Rigshospitalet
Ian Law
Ian Law Copenhagen University Hospital
Grant J. Jensen
Grant J. Jensen California Institute of Technology
Michael Ploug
Michael Ploug University of Copenhagen
Lena Specht
Lena Specht University of Copenhagen
Søren Holm
Søren Holm University of Manchester
Lars Køber
Lars Køber Copenhagen University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career options related to medicine in the USA can open multiple doors, including accessible online degrees and specialized pathways. For those interested in nursing but lacking a nursing background, direct entry msn programs for non nurses online allow students to fast-track their education and enter advanced nursing roles efficiently.

If you are aiming for a more straightforward application process, some direct admit nursing programs offer greater flexibility and fewer barriers, making them ideal for aspiring nurses seeking a smooth transition into their careers.

Alternatively, those interested in the administrative side of healthcare can pursue a degree through one of the best medical billing and coding schools online, some of which also provide financial aid for eligible students.

Students concerned about admissions tests can also explore nursing school that don't require teas, making the pathway to a nursing degree even more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Andreas Kjaer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles