World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
61
Citations
12908
World Ranking
3688
National Ranking
25

Ian Law publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Law sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 287 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ian Law D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Law sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ian Law is a researcher affiliated with Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark. Their work predominantly spans various fields within medicine, with a strong emphasis on radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. The scientist's contributions cover multiple subfields including genetics, neurology, epidemiology, and psychiatry and mental health.

Their research topics reveal a focus on medical imaging techniques and applications, glioma diagnosis and treatment, and radiomics with machine learning applied to medical imaging. Other key areas of study include advanced MRI techniques, management of meningioma and schwannoma, as well as dementia and cognitive impairment research, including Alzheimer's disease research and treatments.

Some of their recent significant papers are:

  • Amyloid-PET and 18F-FDG-PET in the diagnostic investigation of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias (2020, The Lancet Neurology)
  • EANM procedure guidelines for brain PET imaging using [18F]FDG, version 3 (2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging)
  • EANM practice guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for dopaminergic imaging in Parkinsonian syndromes 1.0 (2020, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging)
  • Contribution of PET imaging to radiotherapy planning and monitoring in glioma patients - a report of the PET/RANO group (2021, Neuro-Oncology)
  • Poor prognosis associated with TERT gene alterations in meningioma is independent of the WHO classification: an individual patient data meta-analysis (2020, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ian Law include:

  • Otto Mølby Henriksen
  • Lisbeth Marner
  • Norbert Galldiks
  • Steen Gregers Hasselbalch
  • Nathalie L. Albert

The researcher regularly publishes in these venues:

  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Neuro-Oncology
  • EJNMMI Research
  • NeuroImage
  • Diagnostics

Best Publications

  • Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas.

    Nathalie L. Albert;Michael Weller;Bogdana Suchorska;Norbert Galldiks

  • 18F-flutemetamol amyloid imaging in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment : a phase 2 trial.

    Rik Vandenberghe;Rik Vandenberghe;Koen Van Laere;Adrian Ivanoiu;Eric Salmon

  • Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [18F]FDG: version 1.0.

    Ian Law;Nathalie L. Albert;Javier Arbizu;Ronald Boellaard;Ronald Boellaard

  • Amyloid-PET and 18F-FDG-PET in the diagnostic investigation of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias

    Gaël Chételat;Javier Arbizu;Henryk Barthel;Valentina Garibotto

  • Cerebral activation during micturition in normal men.

    Sam Nour;Claus Svarer;Jørgen K. I. Kristensen;Olaf B. Paulson

  • Regional differences in the CBF and BOLD responses to hypercapnia: a combined PET and fMRI study.

    E. Rostrup;I. Law;M. Blinkenberg;H.B.W. Larsson

  • Brain activation during dichotic presentations of consonant-vowel and musical instrument stimuli: a 15O-PET study

    K Hugdahl;K Brønnick;S Kyllingsbaek;I Law

  • A multi-centre evaluation of eleven clinically feasible brain PET/MRI attenuation correction techniques using a large cohort of patients

    Claes N. Ladefoged;Ian Law;Udunna Anazodo;Keith St. Lawrence

  • EANM Practice Guideline/SNMMI Procedure Standard for Dopaminergic Imaging in Parkinsonian Syndromes 1.0

    Silvia Morbelli;Giuseppe Esposito;Javier Arbizu;Henryk Barthel

  • PET imaging in patients with meningioma - Report of the RANO/PET Group

    Norbert Galldiks;Norbert Galldiks;Nathalie L Albert;Michael Sommerauer;Michael Sommerauer;Anca L Grosu

  • Combined PET/MR imaging in neurology: MR-based attenuation correction implies a strong spatial bias when ignoring bone

    Flemming Littrup Andersen;Claes Nøhr Ladefoged;Thomas Beyer;Sune Høgild Keller

  • The relationship between cerebral blood flow and volume in humans

    Egill Rostrup;Gitte Moos Knudsen;Ian Law;Søren Holm

  • PET imaging in patients with brain metastasis-report of the RANO/PET group.

    Norbert Galldiks;Norbert Galldiks;Karl-Josef Langen;Nathalie L Albert;Marc Chamberlain

  • Rate Dependence of Regional Cerebral Activation during Performance of a Repetitive Motor Task: A PET Study

    Morten Blinkenberg;Christian Bonde;Søren Holm;Claus Svarer

  • Effects of attention on dichotic listening: an 15O-PET study.

    Kenneth Hugdahl;Ian Law;Søren Kyllingsbæk;Søren Kyllingsbæk;Kolbjørn Brønnick

  • When Action Turns into Words. Activation of Motor-Based Knowledge during Categorization of Manipulable Objects

    Christian Gerlach;Ian Law;Olaf B. Paulson

  • Missense dopamine transporter mutations associate with adult parkinsonism and ADHD

    Freja H. Hansen;Tina Skjørringe;Saiqa Yasmeen;Natascha V. Arends

  • Cerebral hemodynamics measured with simultaneous PET and near-infrared spectroscopy in humans.

    Egill Rostrup;Ian Law;Frank Pott;Kohjiro Ide

  • The caudate nucleus in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Reduced metabolism following treatment with paroxetine: a PET study.

    Elsebet Steno Hansen;Steen Hasselbalch;Ian Law;Tom G. Bolwig

  • Perceptual differentiation and category effects in normal object recognition: a PET study

    Christian Gerlach;I Law;A Gade;O B Paulson

Frequent Co-Authors

Olaf B. Paulson
Olaf B. Paulson University of Copenhagen
Andreas Kjaer
Andreas Kjaer University of Copenhagen
Claus Svarer
Claus Svarer Copenhagen University Hospital
Henrik Larsson
Henrik Larsson Karolinska Institute
Søren Holm
Søren Holm University of Manchester
Gunhild Waldemar
Gunhild Waldemar Copenhagen University Hospital
Karl-Josef Langen
Karl-Josef Langen Forschungszentrum Jülich
David J. Brooks
David J. Brooks Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ian Law

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles