World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
73
Citations
16816
World Ranking
2226
National Ranking
18

Gunhild Waldemar publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gunhild Waldemar sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 426 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Gunhild Waldemar D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gunhild Waldemar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gunhild Waldemar is affiliated with Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly in the domains of dementia and cognitive impairment.

Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, and Economics and Econometrics.

Key research topics covered by Waldemar include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Waldemar's frequent co-authors comprise Kristian Steen Frederiksen, Steen Gregers Hasselbalch, Asmus Vogel, Anja Hviid Simonsen, and Mathias Holsey Gramkow, each collaborating extensively over multiple publications.

Their work has been published primarily in reputed venues such as:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Gunhild Waldemar include:

  • "The role of physical and cognitive function in performance of activities of daily living in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease - a cross-sectional study" (2020, BMC Geriatrics)
  • "Hospital-diagnosed sleep disorders and incident dementia: a nationwide observational cohort study" (2022, European Journal of Neurology)
  • "Long-Term EEG Monitoring in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease Using Ear-EEG: A Feasibility Study" (2022, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease)
  • "Subclinical Epileptiform Activity in Dementia with Lewy Bodies" (2023, Movement Disorders)
  • "Impairment of Episodic-Specific Autobiographical Memory in Individuals with Subjective Cognitive Decline and in Patients with Prodromal or Mild Alzheimer's Disease" (2021, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease)

Best Publications

  • A 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in patients with mild to moderate AD

    B. Winblad;K. Engedal;H. Soininen;F. Verhey

  • Association of gait and balance disorders with age-related white matter changes The LADIS Study

    H. Baezner;C. Blahak;A. Poggesi;L. Pantoni

  • Impact of Age-Related Cerebral White Matter Changes on the Transition to Disability – The LADIS Study: Rationale, Design and Methodology

    Leonardo Pantoni;Anna Maria Basile;Giovanni Pracucci;Kjell Asplund

  • Changes in white matter as determinant of global functional decline in older independent outpatients: three year follow-up of LADIS (leukoaraiosis and disability) study cohort

    Domenico Inzitari;Giovanni Pracucci;Anna Poggesi;Giovanna Carlucci

  • Progression of white matter hyperintensities and incidence of new lacunes over a 3-year period: the Leukoaraiosis and Disability study.

    A.A. Gouw;W.M. van der Flier;F. Fazekas;E.C.W. van Straaten

  • Small Vessel Disease and General Cognitive Function in Nondisabled Elderly The LADIS Study

    Wiesje M. van der Flier;Elizabeth C.W. van Straaten;Frederik Barkhof;Ana Verdelho

  • Moderate-to-High Intensity Physical Exercise in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Kristine Hoffmann;Nanna A Sobol;Kristian S Frederiksen;Nina Beyer

  • Awareness of deficits in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: Do MCI patients have impaired insight?

    Asmus Vogel;Jette Stokholm;Anders Gade;Birgitte Bo Andersen

  • Determinants of costs of care for patients with Alzheimer's disease.

    Linus Jönsson;Maria Eriksdotter Jönhagen;Lena Kilander;Hilkka Soininen

  • White matter changes and diabetes predict cognitive decline in the elderly The LADIS Study

    A. Verdelho;S. Madureira;C. Moleiro;J.M. Ferro

  • 2001-2011: A Decade of the LADIS (Leukoaraiosis And DISability) Study: What Have We Learned about White Matter Changes and Small-Vessel Disease?

    Anna Poggesi;Leonardo Pantoni;Domenico Inzitari

  • Longitudinal cognitive decline in subcortical ischemic vascular disease--the LADIS Study.

    H. Jokinen;H. Kalska;R. Ylikoski;S. Madureira

  • 3-Year Study of Donepezil Therapy in Alzheimer’s Disease: Effects of Early and Continuous Therapy

    B. Winblad;A. Wimo;K. Engedal;H. Soininen

  • Differential impact of cerebral white matter changes, diabetes, hypertension and stroke on cognitive performance among non-disabled elderly. The LADIS study

    Ana Verdelho;Sofia Madureira;José M Ferro;Anna-Maria Basile

  • The EADC-ADNI Harmonized Protocol for manual hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance: Evidence of validity

    Giovanni B. Frisoni;Clifford R. Jack;Martina Bocchetta;Corinna Bauer

  • Differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases using structural MRI data

    Juha Koikkalainen;Hanneke Rhodius-Meester;Antti Tolonen;Frederik Barkhof

  • Cognitive and functional neuroimaging correlate for anosognosia in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

    Asmus Vogel;Steen G. Hasselbalch;Anders Gade;Anders Gade;Morten Ziebell

  • Potentially reversible conditions in 1000 consecutive memory clinic patients

    A Hejl;P Høgh;G Waldemar

  • Patient versus informant reported quality of life in the earliest phases of Alzheimer's disease.

    Asmus Vogel;Erik Lykke Mortensen;Steen G. Hasselbalch;Birgitte B. Andersen

  • White matter changes and late-life depressive symptoms: longitudinal study.

    Andrew Teodorczuk;John T. O'Brien;Michael J. Firbank;Leonardo Pantoni

  • Deep frontal and periventricular age related white matter changes but not basal ganglia and infratentorial hyperintensities are associated with falls: cross sectional results from the LADIS study

    Christian Blahak;Hansjoerg Baezner;Leonardo Pantoni;Anna Poggesi

  • Research Article The EADC-ADNI Harmonized Protocol for manual hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance: Evidence of validity

    Giovanni B. Frisoni;Martina Bocchetta;Corinna Bauer;Kristian S. Frederiksen

Frequent Co-Authors

Domenico Inzitari
Domenico Inzitari University of Florence
Timo Erkinjuntti
Timo Erkinjuntti University of Helsinki
Leonardo Pantoni
Leonardo Pantoni University of Milan
Philip Scheltens
Philip Scheltens Amsterdam UMC
Franz Fazekas
Franz Fazekas Medical University of Graz
Lars-Olof Wahlund
Lars-Olof Wahlund Karolinska Institute
Olaf B. Paulson
Olaf B. Paulson University of Copenhagen
Anders Wallin
Anders Wallin University of Gothenburg
José M. Ferro
José M. Ferro University of Lisbon
Frederik Barkhof
Frederik Barkhof University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Gunhild Waldemar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles