World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
28181
World Ranking
17418
National Ranking
189

Lena Specht publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lena Specht sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 501 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lena Specht D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lena Specht sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lena Specht is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their research primarily focuses on medical and clinical aspects within the fields of medicine, including significant contributions to radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, pathology and forensic medicine, oncology, and radiation. Specht's work encompasses a range of topics that intersect with advanced therapeutic and diagnostic techniques.

The main topics of Specht's research include:

  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Effects of Radiation Exposure

Specht's publications have appeared frequently in several specialized journals. Notable venues include:

  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Radiotherapy and Oncology
  • Hematological Oncology
  • Acta Oncologica
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Some of Lena Specht's recent papers are:

  • Involved Site Radiation Therapy in Adult Lymphomas: An Overview of International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group Guidelines (2020, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics)
  • ILROG emergency guidelines for radiation therapy of hematological malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020, Blood)
  • Brentuximab Vedotin Plus AVD for First-Line Treatment of Early-Stage Unfavorable Hodgkin Lymphoma (BREACH): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Phase II Trial (2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology)
  • Modern Radiation Therapy for Extranodal Nasal-Type NK/T-cell Lymphoma: Risk-Adapted Therapy, Target Volume, and Dose Guidelines from the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (2021, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics)
  • Stage I-II nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma: a multi-institutional study of adult patients by ILROG (2020, Blood)

Collaborative work is a significant part of Specht's research activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ivan R. Vogelius
  • Umberto Ricardi
  • Anne Kiil Berthelsen
  • Jeppe Friborg
  • Andrea K. Ng

Best Publications

  • Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma

    Bruce D. Cheson;Beate Pfistner;Malik E. Juweid;Randy D. Gascoyne

  • Early Interim 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography Is Prognostically Superior to International Prognostic Score in Advanced-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Report From a Joint Italian-Danish Study

    Andrea Gallamini;Martin Hutchings;Luigi Rigacci;Lena Specht

  • FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma

    Martin Hutchings;Annika Loft;Annika Loft;Mads Hansen;Mads Hansen;Lars Møller Pedersen;Lars Møller Pedersen

  • Five compared with six fractions per week of conventional radiotherapy of squamous-cell carcinoma of head and neck: DAHANCA 6&7 randomised controlled trial

    Jens Overgaard;Hanne Sand Hansen;Lena Specht;Marie Overgaard

  • A randomized double-blind phase III study of nimorazole as a hypoxic radiosensitizer of primary radiotherapy in supraglottic larynx and pharynx carcinoma. Results of the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Study (DAHANCA) Protocol 5-85

    Jens Overgaard;Hanne Sand Hansen;Marie Overgaard;Lars Bastholt

  • Prognostic Factors for Relapse in Stage I Seminoma Managed by Surveillance: A Pooled Analysis

    Padraig Warde;Lena Specht;Alan Horwich;Tim Oliver

  • Modern radiation therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma: field and dose guidelines from the international lymphoma radiation oncology group (ILROG).

    Lena Specht;Joachim Yahalom;Tim Illidge;Anne Kiil Berthelsen

  • Early Positron Emission Tomography Response-Adapted Treatment in Stage I and II Hodgkin Lymphoma : Final Results of the Randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 Trial

    Marc P. E. Andre;Theodore Girinsky;Massimo Federico;Oumedaly Reman

  • Involved-node radiotherapy (INRT) in patients with early Hodgkin lymphoma: Concepts and guidelines

    Theodore Girinsky;Richard van der Maazen;Lena Specht;Berthe Aleman

  • Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: clinical characteristics and relation to the field of irradiation.

    Jens Jørgen Thorn;Hanne Sand Hansen;Lena Specht;Lars Bastholt

  • Modern radiation therapy for extranodal lymphomas: field and dose guidelines from the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group.

    Joachim Yahalom;Tim Illidge;Lena Specht;Richard T. Hoppe

  • Routine Bone Marrow Biopsy Has Little or No Therapeutic Consequence for Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography–Staged Treatment-Naive Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma

    Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly;Francesco d'Amore;Karen Juul Mylam;Peter de Nully Brown

  • Surveillance following orchidectomy for stage I seminoma of the testis

    Hans von der Maase;Lena Specht;Grete Krag Jacobsen;Anders Jakobsen

  • Breathing adapted radiotherapy for breast cancer : Comparison of free breathing gating with the breath-hold technique

    Stine S. Korreman;Anders N. Pedersen;Trine Jakobi Nøttrup;Lena Specht

  • Influence of more extensive radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy on long-term outcome of early-stage Hodgkin's disease: a meta-analysis of 23 randomized trials involving 3,888 patients. International Hodgkin's Disease Collaborative Group.

    L Specht;R G Gray;M J Clarke;R Peto

  • Breathing adapted radiotherapy of breast cancer: reduction of cardiac and pulmonary doses using voluntary inspiration breath-hold

    Anders N Pedersen;Stine Korreman;Håkan Nyström;Lena Specht

  • Primary cutaneous lymphomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    R Willemze;E. Hodak;P. L. Zinzani;L. Specht

  • Position emission tomography with or without computed tomography in the primary staging of Hodgkin's lymphoma

    Martin Hutchings;Annika Loft;Mads Hansen;Lars M Pedersen

  • Modern radiation therapy for nodal non-hodgkin lymphoma - Target definition and dose guidelines from the international lymphoma radiation oncology group

    Tim Illidge;Lena Specht;Joachim Yahalom;Berthe Aleman

  • The role of miRNAs in human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated cancers: bridging between HPV-related head and neck cancer and cervical cancer

    C B Lajer;E Garnæs;L Friis-Hansen;B Norrild

Frequent Co-Authors

Søren M. Bentzen
Søren M. Bentzen University of Maryland, Baltimore
Joachim Yahalom
Joachim Yahalom Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Cai Grau
Cai Grau Aarhus University
Jens Overgaard
Jens Overgaard Aarhus University Hospital
Richard T. Hoppe
Richard T. Hoppe Stanford University
Andreas Kjaer
Andreas Kjaer University of Copenhagen
Rasmus Larsen
Rasmus Larsen Technical University of Denmark
Peter Mauch
Peter Mauch Brigham and Women's Hospital
Louis S. Constine
Louis S. Constine University of Rochester Medical Center
Finn Cilius Nielsen
Finn Cilius Nielsen Copenhagen University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine in the USA opens many related career opportunities through online programs. Nursing is a popular choice, with a variety of degrees available for different career stages. For students seeking to become a registered nurse, exploring an online nursing school can offer affordable and flexible pathways.

Many registered nurses look to advance their credentials. If you already hold an RN license, enrolling in the cheapest rn to bsn program can help you earn a bachelor’s degree at lower cost and with scheduling flexibility. Those aiming for advanced practice roles may consider a nurse practitioner route; finding the cheapest np school online can be a cost-effective way to earn this valuable qualification.

For nurses interested in leadership or academic roles, doctoral programs offer the highest credentials. If this is your goal, researching the cheapest dnp programs can save significant tuition and allow you to study while working. Overall, these online degrees make healthcare education more accessible and support diverse career pathways in the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Lena Specht

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles