World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 62 3198 2944 1818 1635 145 17818

Martha Storandt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martha Storandt between 1965 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martha Storandt published across 59 years, from 1965 to 2023, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2006. 1 of the 149 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2006. 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 2 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1965 2023

149 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martha Storandt: publications per year, 1965 to 2023
Year Publications
1965 1
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 2
1973 3
1974 4
1975 4
1976 1
1977 2
1978 5
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 2
1983 5
1984 3
1985 3
1986 4
1987 4
1988 2
1989 2
1990 5
1991 5
1992 6
1993 3
1994 5
1995 4
1996 3
1997 2
1998 6
1999 1
2000 3
2001 3
2002 2
2003 4
2004 7
2005 7
2006 9
2007 3
2008 2
2009 6
2010 4
2011 1
2012 3
2013 1
2014 1
2015 0
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 2
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
Total 149
Download as CSV

Martha Storandt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha Storandt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 145 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 145
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Martha Storandt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha Storandt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 62
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1979 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Martha Storandt is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research activity centers primarily in the field of Medicine with a particular focus on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Oncology.

Their research topics address several areas including:

  • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

Storandt has contributed to academic literature in venues such as Annals of Oncology, where they published a study in 2023 titled "P-142 Completion of genetic testing and incidence of pathogenic germline mutation among patients with early-onset colorectal cancer, a single institution retrospective analysis."

Frequent collaborators in their research include K. Rogen, Ananya Iyyangar, Jessica L. Mitchell, Joleen M. Hubbard, and Frank A. Sinicrope.

In 1979, Martha Storandt received recognition as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer disease.

    John C. Morris;Martha Storandt;J. Phillip Miller;Daniel W. McKeel

  • The AD8: A brief informant interview to detect dementia

    J. E. Galvin;C. M. Roe;K. K. Powlishta;M. A. Coats

  • Pittsburgh compound B imaging and prediction of progression from cognitive normality to symptomatic Alzheimer disease.

    John C. Morris;Catherine M. Roe;Elizabeth A. Grant;Denise Head

  • A longitudinal EEG study of mild senile dementia of Alzheimer type: changes at 1 year and at 2.5 years☆

    Lawrence A Coben;Warren Danziger;Martha Storandt

  • A prospective study of cognitive function and onset of dementia in cognitively healthy elders.

    Eugene H. Rubin;Martha Storandt;J. Philip Miller;Dorothy A. Kinscherf

  • Psychometric differentiation of mild senile dementia of the Alzheimer type.

    Martha Storandt;Jack Botwinick;Warren L. Danziger;Leonard Berg

  • Cognitive Decline and Brain Volume Loss as Signatures of Cerebral Amyloid-β Peptide Deposition Identified With Pittsburgh Compound B: Cognitive Decline Associated With Aβ Deposition

    Martha Storandt;Mark A. Mintun;Denise Head;John C. Morris

  • Longitudinal course and neuropathologic outcomes in original vs revised MCI and in pre-MCI.

    Martha Storandt;Elizabeth A. Grant;J. Philip Miller;John C. Morris

  • Progressive posterior cortical dysfunction: a clinicopathologic series.

    J. A. Renner;J. M. Burns;C. E. Hou;D. W. McKeel

  • Longitudinal Study of the Transition From Healthy Aging to Alzheimer Disease

    David K. Johnson;Martha Storandt;John C. Morris;James E. Galvin

  • Very Mild Senile Dementia of the Alzheimer Type: II. Psychometric Test Performance

    Martha Storandt;Robert D. Hill

  • Rates of progression in mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease.

    Martha Storandt;Elizabeth A. Grant;J. Philip Miller;John C. Morris

  • Predictors of Subjective Memory in Older Adults

    Ann Pearman;Martha Storandt

  • Predictors of Preclinical Alzheimer Disease and Dementia: A Clinicopathologic Study

    James E. Galvin;Kimberly K. Powlishta;Kenneth Wilkins;Daniel W. McKeel

  • Mild senile dementia of the Alzheimer type: 2. Longitudinal assessment.

    Leonard Berg;J. Philip Miller;Martha Storandt;Janet Duchek

  • On the Preservation of Syntax in Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence From Written Sentences

    S Kemper;E LaBarge;F R Ferraro;H Cheung

  • Absence of Pittsburgh Compound B Detection of Cerebral Amyloid β in a Patient With Clinical, Cognitive, and Cerebrospinal Fluid Markers of Alzheimer Disease: A Case Report

    Nigel J. Cairns;Milos D. Ikonomovic;Tammie Benzinger;Martha Storandt

  • Long-term Cognitive Decline in Older Subjects Was Not Attributable to Noncardiac Surgery or Major Illness

    Michael S. Avidan;Adam C. Searleman;Martha Storandt;Kara Barnett

  • Personality Change Precedes Clinical Diagnosis of Dementia of the Alzheimer Type

    Steve Balsis;Brian D. Carpenter;Martha Storandt

  • Predictive features in mild senile dementia of the Alzheimer type

    Leonard Berg;Warren L. Danziger;Martha Storandt;Lawrence A. Coben

Frequent Co-Authors

John C. Morris
John C. Morris Washington University in St. Louis
Anne M. Fagan
Anne M. Fagan Washington University in St. Louis
David A. Balota
David A. Balota Washington University in St. Louis
David M. Holtzman
David M. Holtzman Washington University in St. Louis
Leonard H. van den Berg
Leonard H. van den Berg Utrecht University
Mark A. Mintun
Mark A. Mintun University of Pennsylvania
Denise Head
Denise Head Washington University in St. Louis
Joseph L. Price
Joseph L. Price Washington University in St. Louis
Janet M. Duchek
Janet M. Duchek Washington University in St. Louis
Alison Goate
Alison Goate Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens diverse pathways beyond traditional counseling roles. Many students consider online programs for their flexibility and convenience, enabling them to balance academic goals with work or family commitments. Studying psychology online not only builds a strong theoretical foundation but can also lead to practical careers in counseling, mental health services, education, or even business sectors like human resources.

If you're interested in counseling, there are many respected programs across the country. For example, those looking in the Northeast can explore the top counseling degree programs in New York, while students in the Midwest might prefer to look at the best counseling degree programs in Ohio. The South has quality options as well, such as Oklahoma counseling degree programs. If you are closer to Missouri, the best counseling degree programs in Saint Louis are a great place to start.

When considering an online degree, research accreditation, faculty expertise, and specialized tracks that fit your career aspirations. With the right program, graduates can pursue licensure and make a meaningful impact in their communities and chosen field.

Best Scientists Citing Martha Storandt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles