World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9524 8906 939 899 95 5429

Richard J. Allen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard J. Allen between 1964 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard J. Allen published across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2024. 24 of the 138 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2024. 1964: 2 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 8 publications
1964 2025

138 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard J. Allen: publications per year, 1964 to 2025
Year Publications
1964 2
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 2
2007 0
2008 1
2009 2
2010 3
2011 4
2012 7
2013 4
2014 10
2015 9
2016 9
2017 10
2018 9
2019 10
2020 6
2021 10
2022 7
2023 8
2024 16
2025 8
Total 138
Download as CSV

Richard J. Allen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Allen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 95
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard J. Allen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Allen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard J. Allen is a researcher primarily affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their work largely focuses on neuroscience and psychology, particularly within the domains of cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their research contributions encompass various topics including:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

In terms of collaborations, Richard J. Allen has frequently coauthored work with:

  • Amy Louise Atkinson
  • Amanda Waterman
  • Alan Baddeley
  • Graham J. Hitch
  • J Havelka

Their research has appeared in several recurrent publication venues, demonstrating a focus on experimental psychology and memory-related fields. These include:

  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Memory
  • Memory & Cognition
  • Cortex
  • Wellcome Open Research

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Richard J. Allen are:

  • Strategic prioritisation enhances young and older adults' visual feature binding in working memory, 2020, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Can valuable information be prioritized in verbal working memory?, 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Why does the probe value effect emerge in working memory? Examining the biased attentional refreshing account, 2022, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Unimodal and crossmodal working memory binding is not differentially affected by age or Alzheimer's disease., 2020, Neuropsychology
  • The multicomponent model of working memory fifty years on, 2024, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Richard J. Allen's work contributes to advancing understanding in cognitive and neural mechanisms underpinning working memory, visual processing, and memory binding, integrating findings across behavioral experiments and neuroscience methodologies.

Best Publications

  • Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding?

    Richard J. Allen;Alan D. Baddeley;Graham J. Hitch

  • Binding in visual working memory: the role of the episodic buffer.

    Alan D. Baddeley;Richard J. Allen;Graham J. Hitch

  • Working memory and binding in sentence recall

    A.D. Baddeley;G.J. Hitch;R.J. Allen

  • Is the hippocampus necessary for visual and verbal binding in working memory

    Alan Baddeley;Richard Allen;Faraneh Vargha-Khadem

  • Feature binding and attention in working memory: A resolution of previous contradictory findings:

    Richard J. Allen;Graham J. Hitch;Judit Mate;Alan D. Baddeley

  • Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall

    Richard Allen;Charles Hulme

  • Cross-modal binding and working memory

    Richard J. Allen;Graham J. Hitch;Alan D. Baddeley

  • From short-term store to multicomponent working memory: The role of the modal model.

    Alan David Baddeley;Graham James Hitch;Richard Allen

  • Investigating the episodic buffer

    Alan Baddeley;Richard J Allen;Graham J Hitch

  • Are forward and backward recall the same? A dual-task study of digit recall.

    Helen L. St Clair-Thompson;Richard J. Allen

  • Executive and perceptual attention play different roles in visual working memory: evidence from suffix and strategy effects

    Yanmei Hu;Graham J Hitch;Alan D Baddeley;Ming Zhang

  • Evidence for Two Attentional Components in Visual Working Memory

    Richard J. Allen;Alan D. Baddeley;Graham J. Hitch

  • Binding across space and time in visual working memory.

    Paul Johan Karlsen;Richard J. Allen;Alan D. Baddeley;Graham J. Hitch

  • Executive control of stimulus-driven and goal-directed attention in visual working memory

    Yanmei Hu;Richard J Allen;Alan D Baddeley;Graham J Hitch

  • Disruption of visual feature binding in working memory

    Taiji Ueno;Taiji Ueno;Richard J. Allen;Alan D. Baddeley;Graham J. Hitch

  • A Multicomponent Model of Working Memory

    Alan Baddeley;Graham Hitch;Richard Allen

  • Memory for actions in autism spectrum disorder

    D Z Wojcik;R J Allen;C Brown;C Souchay

  • What goes through the gate? Exploring interference with visual feature binding.

    Taiji Ueno;Judit Mate;Richard J. Allen;Graham J. Hitch

  • Multiple high-reward items can be prioritized in working memory but with greater vulnerability to interference

    Richard J Allen;Taiji Ueno

  • Competition for the focus of attention in visual working memory: perceptual recency versus executive control

    Graham J. Hitch;Yanmei Hu;Richard J. Allen;Alan D. Baddeley

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan D. Baddeley
Alan D. Baddeley University of York
Graham J. Hitch
Graham J. Hitch University of York
Mark Mon-Williams
Mark Mon-Williams University of Leeds
Susan E. Gathercole
Susan E. Gathercole University of Cambridge
Joni Holmes
Joni Holmes MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Raymond C.K. Chan
Raymond C.K. Chan Chinese Academy of Sciences
Faraneh Vargha-Khadem
Faraneh Vargha-Khadem University College London
Charles Hulme
Charles Hulme University of Oxford
Robert H. Logie
Robert H. Logie University of Edinburgh
Kate Nation
Kate Nation University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens the door to various career paths, with social work emerging as a popular and rewarding option. Social work professionals play a crucial role in mental health, community services, and family support, often collaborating with psychologists in diverse settings.

Many students seek flexible, affordable education by exploring online social work programs. There are numerous accredited programs nationwide that offer both quality and value, making it easier than ever to advance your career from anywhere.

If you are interested in starting or advancing in social work, consider exploring the best value online social work programs in the Midwest, or focus your search geographically with the best value online social work degrees in Nevada. Ohio residents may benefit from specialized choices found among the best value online social work programs in Ohio, while those in the Southeast can find top choices among the most valuable online social work degree programs in Tennessee.

With online degrees, career advancement in psychology and social work is more accessible, affordable, and tailored to your location and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Allen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles