World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 66 2677 2452 299 282 182 19320

Kate Nation publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kate Nation between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kate Nation published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2025. 31 of the 199 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2025. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 10 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 9 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 17 publications
1996 2025

199 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kate Nation: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 10
1998 3
1999 4
2000 1
2001 4
2002 2
2003 2
2004 4
2005 7
2006 9
2007 4
2008 10
2009 8
2010 7
2011 6
2012 3
2013 1
2014 9
2015 6
2016 2
2017 6
2018 11
2019 7
2020 10
2021 8
2022 16
2023 7
2024 14
2025 17
Total 199
Download as CSV

Kate Nation publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate Nation sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 182 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 182
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kate Nation D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate Nation sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218 66
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2000 - Spearman Medal, British Psychological Society
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Kate Nation is a researcher affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their scholarly work primarily spans the field of psychology, with a special focus on developmental and educational psychology. The research also encompasses cognitive neuroscience, education, artificial intelligence, and language and linguistics.

The main areas of study covered by their publications include reading and literacy development, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, language development and disorders, text readability and simplification, child development and digital technology, writing and handwriting education, and child and animal learning development.

They have frequently published in several scientific journals, including:

  • Scientific Studies of Reading
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Oxford Review of Education
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • Child Development

Coauthors who frequently collaborate with this researcher include:

  • Yaling Hsiao
  • Anne Castles
  • Signy Wegener
  • Nilanjana Banerji
  • Hua-Chen Wang

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Defining and understanding dyslexia: past, present and future," 2020, Oxford Review of Education
  • "Book Language and Its Implications for Children's Language, Literacy, and Development," 2022, Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • "Comprehension Monitoring during Reading: An Eye-tracking Study with Children Learning English as an Additional Language," 2020, Scientific Studies of Reading
  • "Anchoring and contextual variation in the early stages of incidental word learning during reading," 2021, Journal of Memory and Language
  • "The nature and frequency of relative clauses in the language children hear and the language children read: A developmental cross-corpus analysis of English complex grammar," 2022, Journal of Child Language

The researcher has received recognition from professional bodies, including the Spearman Medal awarded by the British Psychological Society in 2000 and fellowship status within the Academy of Social Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Ending the reading wars: reading acquisition from novice to expert

    Anne Castles;Kathleen Rastle;Kate Nation

  • Beyond phonological skills: broader language skills contribute to the development of reading

    Kate Nation;Margaret J. Snowling

  • Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties.

    Kate Nation;Margaret J. Snowling

  • Patterns of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorder.

    Kate Nation;Paula Clarke;Barry Wright;Christine Williams

  • Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than onset-rime awareness.

    Charles Hulme;Peter J. Hatcher;Kate Nation;Angela Brown

  • Vocabulary Is Important for Some, but Not All Reading Skills

    Jessie Ricketts;Kate Nation;Dorothy V. M. Bishop

  • Working Memory Deficits in Poor Comprehenders Reflect Underlying Language Impairments

    Kate Nation;John W. Adams;Claudine A. Bowyer-Crane;Margaret J. Snowling

  • Children's Reading Comprehension Difficulties

    Kate Nation

  • Individual Differences in Contextual Facilitation: Evidence from Dyslexia and Poor Reading Comprehension

    Kate Nation;Margaret J. Snowling

  • Hidden language impairments in children: parallels between poor reading comprehension and specific language impairment?

    Kate Nation;Paula Clarke;Catherine M. Marshall;Marianne Durand

  • A longitudinal investigation of early reading and language skills in children with poor reading comprehension

    Kate Nation;Joanne Cocksey;Jo S.H. Taylor;Dorothy V.M. Bishop

  • Phonemic Segmentation, Not Onset-Rime Segmentation, Predicts Early Reading and Spelling Skills.

    Kate Nation;Charles Hulme

  • Assessing reading difficulties: the validity and utility of current measures of reading skill.

    Kate Nation;Margaret Snowling

  • Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: evidence from semantic priming.

    Kate Nation;Margaret J Snowling

  • Factors influencing syntactic awareness skills in normal readers and poor comprehenders

    Kate Nation;Margaret J. Snowling

  • Sensitivity to eye gaze in autism: is it normal? Is it automatic? Is it social?

    Kate Nation;Sophia Penny

  • Do infant vocabulary skills predict school-age language and literacy outcomes?

    Fiona J. Duff;Gurpreet Reen;Kim Plunkett;Kate Nation

  • Why Reading Comprehension Fails: Insights From Developmental Disorders

    Kate Nation;Courtenay Frazier Norbury

  • Orthographic learning via self-teaching in children learning to read English: effects of exposure, durability, and context.

    Kate Nation;Philip Angell;Anne Castles

  • Defining and understanding dyslexia: past, present and future.

    Margaret J. Snowling;Charles Hulme;Kate Nation

  • Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert (vol 19, pg 5, 2018)

    A Castles;K Rastle;K Nation

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret J. Snowling
Margaret J. Snowling University of Oxford
Anne Castles
Anne Castles Macquarie University
Dorothy V. M. Bishop
Dorothy V. M. Bishop University of Oxford
Charles Hulme
Charles Hulme University of Oxford
Courtenay Frazier Norbury
Courtenay Frazier Norbury University College London
Kim Plunkett
Kim Plunkett University of Oxford
Rogier A. Kievit
Rogier A. Kievit Donders Institute
Lyndsey Nickels
Lyndsey Nickels Macquarie University
Karalyn Patterson
Karalyn Patterson MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Patricia A. Jacobs
Patricia A. Jacobs University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up diverse career paths, including roles as a licensed professional counselor (LPC), therapist, and mental health specialist. With growth in online degree programs, more students are preparing for their careers remotely, but it is essential to understand that licensure requirements vary by location.

For those interested in becoming a licensed therapist in Portland, candidates must complete coursework, supervised experience, and pass national examinations. Similarly, the process for how to become a licensed therapist in Raleigh includes specific educational and clinical hour requirements to ensure readiness for professional practice.

In Reno, aspiring professionals must meet Reno licensed therapist requirements, including state-specific exams and background checks. Meanwhile, those pursuing licensure in Richmond should review the licensed therapist requirements in Richmond to understand state mandates and clinical supervision obligations.

No matter the city, online psychology degrees are a convenient foundation, but careful planning is needed to meet each state’s licensing standards and launch a rewarding career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Kate Nation

Trending Scientists