World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
Switzerland
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
82
Citations
27869
World Ranking
1316
National Ranking
14

Klaus Oberauer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Oberauer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 264 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Klaus Oberauer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Oberauer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Switzerland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Switzerland Leader Award

Overview

Klaus Oberauer is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Oberauer's work also touches on social psychology, artificial intelligence, and statistics, probability, and uncertainty.

The scientist's research covers a variety of main topics, including neural and behavioral psychology studies, memory processes and influences, cognitive functions and memory, human-automation interaction and safety, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, visual and cognitive learning processes, and EEG and brain-computer interfaces.

Oberauer's publication record includes papers in frequently targeted venues such as the Journal of Experimental Psychology General, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Cognition, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, and Journal of Cognition.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Oberauer include:

  • The Importance of Random Slopes in Mixed Models for Bayesian Hypothesis Testing, 2022, Psychological Science

Other notable papers related to Oberauer's frequent co-authors include:

  • Low replicability can support robust and efficient science, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science, 2021, Cognition
  • The effects of elaboration on working memory and long-term memory across age, 2021, Journal of Memory and Language
  • What Is Time Good for in Working Memory?, 2021, Psychological Science

Frequent co-authors in Oberauer's research collaborations include Alessandra S. Souza, Gidon T. Frischkorn, Lea Maria Bartsch, Eda Mızrak, and Benjamin Kowialiewski.

Best Publications

  • Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention.

    Klaus Oberauer

  • WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY EXPLAINS REASONING ABILITY - AND A LITTLE BIT MORE

    Heinz-Martin Süß;Klaus Oberauer;Werner W Wittmann;Oliver Wilhelm

  • Design for a working memory.

    Klaus Oberauer

  • The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science

    Stephan Lewandowsky;Stephan Lewandowsky;Gilles E. Gignac;Klaus Oberauer;Klaus Oberauer

  • NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science

    Stephan Lewandowsky;Klaus Oberauer;Gilles E. Gignac

  • Working memory capacity - facets of a cognitive ability construct

    Klaus Oberauer;Heinz-Martin Süß;Ralf Schulze;Oliver Wilhelm

  • Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence

    Florian Schmiedek;Klaus Oberauer;Oliver Wilhelm;Heinz-Martin Süß

  • Working Memory and Intelligence—Their Correlation and Their Relation: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005)

    Klaus Oberauer;Ralf Schulze;Oliver Wilhelm;Heinz-Martin Süss

  • What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it?

    Oliver Wilhelm;Andrea Hildebrandt Hildebrandt;Klaus Oberauer

  • The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination

    Klaus Oberauer;Heinz-Martin Süß;Oliver Wilhelm;Werner W Wittman

  • Neural evidence for a distinction between short-term memory and the focus of attention

    Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock;Andrew T. Drysdale;Klaus Oberauer;Bradley R. Postle

  • Working Memory and Attention - A Conceptual Analysis and Review.

    Klaus Oberauer

  • Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition.

    Klaus Oberauer

  • A formal model of capacity limits in working memory

    Klaus Oberauer;Reinhold Kliegl

  • In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect

    Alessandra S. Souza;Klaus Oberauer

  • Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory.

    Klaus Oberauer;Stephan Lewandowsky;Edward Awh;Gordon D.A. Brown

  • Modeling working memory: An interference model of complex span

    Klaus Oberauer;Stephan Lewandowsky;Simon Farrell;Christopher R Jarrold

  • Motivated Rejection of Science

    Stephan Lewandowsky;Klaus Oberauer

  • Removing irrelevant information from working memory: a cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task.

    Klaus Oberauer

  • Addressing the theory crisis in psychology

    Klaus Oberauer;Stephan Lewandowsky

  • Effects and mechanisms of working memory training: a review.

    Claudia C. von Bastian;Klaus Oberauer

  • An interference model of visual working memory.

    Klaus Oberauer;Hsuan-Yu Lin

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephan Lewandowsky
Stephan Lewandowsky University of Bristol
Oliver Wilhelm
Oliver Wilhelm University of Ulm
Reinhold Kliegl
Reinhold Kliegl University of Potsdam
Gordon D. A. Brown
Gordon D. A. Brown University of Warwick
Simon Farrell
Simon Farrell University of Western Australia
Ullrich K. H. Ecker
Ullrich K. H. Ecker University of Western Australia
Gilles E. Gignac
Gilles E. Gignac University of Western Australia
Lutz Jäncke
Lutz Jäncke University of Zurich
Christopher Jarrold
Christopher Jarrold University of Bristol
Florian Schmiedek
Florian Schmiedek Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and career opportunities, from counseling and therapy to research and social services. With the rise of accredited online programs, students can now pursue foundational studies in psychology as well as specialized concentrations like clinical mental health or school counseling from anywhere in the USA.

For those considering a career as a therapist, it’s important to understand that licensure requirements vary by location. Detailed guidance on how to become a licensed therapist in Austin, as well as the Bakersfield licensed therapist education requirements, highlights the need for region-specific education, supervised clinical experience, and state exams.

Exploring how to become a licensed therapist in Baltimore or the licensed therapist requirements in Boise can help you chart the best educational pathway. No matter where you plan to work, earning the right credentials through an accredited program is essential for advancing your psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Klaus Oberauer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles