World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
28687
World Ranking
6265
National Ranking
3388

Andrew R. A. Conway publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew R. A. Conway sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Andrew R. A. Conway D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew R. A. Conway sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew R. A. Conway is affiliated with Claremont Graduate University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of psychology, with a concentration on experimental and cognitive psychology. The scholar's work also spans cognitive neuroscience, artificial intelligence, developmental and educational psychology, and social psychology.

The main topics addressed in their research include cognitive abilities and testing, mental health research topics, neural and behavioral psychology studies, cognitive science and mapping, child and animal learning development, cultural differences and values, and functional brain connectivity studies.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Conway include:

  • Individual Differences in Attention and Intelligence: A United Cognitive/Psychometric Approach, 2021, Journal of Intelligence
  • Adult bilinguals outperform monolinguals in theory of mind, 2021, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • On the psychometric evaluation of cognitive control tasks: An Investigation with the Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive Control (DMCC) battery, 2023, Behavior Research Methods
  • The Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive Control (DMCC) project: Validation of an online behavioural task battery, 2022, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Psychometric models of individual differences in reading comprehension: A reanalysis of Freed, Hamilton, and Long (2017), 2021, Journal of Memory and Language

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Conway include Han Hao, Kristóf Kovács, Jean-Paul Snijder, Ester Navarro, and Sara Anne Goring. These collaborations reflect a diverse and interdisciplinary approach to their research endeavors.

Conway has contributed to several publication venues, with multiple articles in the Journal of Intelligence, the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Behavior Research Methods, Memory & Cognition, and the Journal of Memory and Language. The Journal of Intelligence stands out as the most frequent venue for their published work.

Best Publications

  • Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach.

    Randall W. Engle;Stephen W. Tuholski;James E. Laughlin;Andrew R. A. Conway

  • Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide

    Andrew R. A. Conway;Michael J. Kane;Michael F. Bunting;D. Zach Hambrick

  • A Controlled-Attention View of Working-Memory Capacity

    Michael J. Kane;M. Kathryn Bleckley;Andrew R. A. Conway;Randall W. Engle

  • Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence

    Andrew R. A. Conway;Michael J. Kane;Randall W. Engle

  • A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence

    Andrew R.A Conway;Nelson Cowan;Michael F Bunting;David J Therriault

  • On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes.

    Nelson Cowan;Emily M. Elliott;J. Scott Saults;Candice C. Morey

  • The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity.

    Andrew R. A. Conway;Nelson Cowan;Michael F. Bunting

  • Working Memory, Attention Control, and the N-Back Task: A Question of Construct Validity

    Michael J. Kane;Andrew R. A. Conway;Timothy K. Miura;Gregory J. H. Colflesh

  • Working Memory Capacity and Fluid Intelligence Are Strongly Related Constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005)

    Michael J. Kane;David Z. Hambrick;Andrew R. A. Conway

  • Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model.

    Andrew R. A. Conway;Randall W. Engle

  • Variation in working memory

    Andrew R. A. Conway;Christopher Jarrold;Michael J. Kane;Akira Miyake

  • Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control.

    Michael J. Kane;Andrew R. A. Conway;David Z. Hambrick;Randall W. Engle

  • Individual Differences in Delay Discounting Relation to Intelligence, Working Memory, and Anterior Prefrontal Cortex

    Noah A. Shamosh;Colin G. DeYoung;Adam E. Green;Deidre L. Reis

  • Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity: More Evidence for a General Capacity Theory

    Andrew R. A. Conway;Randall W. Engle

  • Process overlap theory: A unified account of the general factor of intelligence.

    Kristof Kovacs;Andrew R. A. Conway

  • Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory.

    Klaus Oberauer;Stephan Lewandowsky;Edward Awh;Gordon D.A. Brown

  • A Resource Account of Inhibition

    Randall W Engle;Andrew R A Conway;Stephen W. Tuholski;Rebecca J Shisler

  • Individual Differences in Susceptibility to False Memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott Paradigm.

    Jason M. Watson;Michael F. Bunting;Bradley J. Poole;Andrew R. A. Conway

  • Neural Mechanisms of Interference Control Underlie the Relationship between Fluid Intelligence and Working Memory Span.

    Gregory C. Burgess;Jeremy R. Gray;Andrew R. A. Conway;Todd S. Braver

  • Working Memory and Fluid Intelligence in Young Children.

    Pascale M.J. Engel de Abreu;Andrew R.A. Conway;Susan E. Gathercole

  • THEORETICAL AND REVIEW ARTICLES Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide

    Andrew R. A. Conway;Michael J. Kane;Michael F. Bunting;D. Zach Hambrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Kane
Michael J. Kane University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Randall W. Engle
Randall W. Engle Georgia Institute of Technology
Todd S. Braver
Todd S. Braver Washington University in St. Louis
Nelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan University of Missouri
David Z. Hambrick
David Z. Hambrick Michigan State University
Jeremy R. Gray
Jeremy R. Gray Michigan State University
Akira Miyake
Akira Miyake University of Colorado Boulder
Stephan Lewandowsky
Stephan Lewandowsky University of Bristol
Gordon D. A. Brown
Gordon D. A. Brown University of Warwick
Edward E. Smith
Edward E. Smith Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and rewarding career paths. Many students pursue degrees in social work, behavioral analysis, or counseling, all of which offer flexible, online accredited programs tailored to meet state-specific requirements. These fields are key to supporting mental health and community wellbeing.

For example, those interested in behavioral analysis can review bcba certification requirements in Wyoming to understand what is needed to become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst. Similarly, students who want to make an impact as a social worker can learn about becoming a social worker in Alabama as well as Alaska social work license requirements. Understanding state licensing is crucial, as each state has unique educational and professional standards.

If you are considering a related path, review Arizona social work education requirements. Whether you’re working toward licensure or exploring online degree programs, staying informed about regional differences is key to advancing your psychology-related career.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew R. A. Conway

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles