World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5110 4740 2812 2545 149 18282

David Z. Hambrick publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Z. Hambrick between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Z. Hambrick published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2017. 3 of the 158 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2017. 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1996 2025

158 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Z. Hambrick: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 3
1997 0
1998 2
1999 2
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 2
2005 4
2006 3
2007 5
2008 4
2009 0
2010 4
2011 7
2012 4
2013 8
2014 8
2015 9
2016 12
2017 15
2018 11
2019 14
2020 9
2021 6
2022 9
2023 10
2024 2
2025 1
Total 158
Download as CSV

David Z. Hambrick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Z. Hambrick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 149 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 149
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

David Z. Hambrick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Z. Hambrick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David Z. Hambrick is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of psychology with a substantial emphasis on experimentally oriented and cognitive aspects.

The scientist's work spans several subfields of study, including:

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

David Z. Hambrick's research encompasses multiple key topics within these subfields, such as:

  • Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Sports Performance and Training
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Sports Medicine
  • Journal of Intelligence
  • Psychological Research
  • Intelligence
  • Scientific Reports

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by David Z. Hambrick include:

  • "Is the Deliberate Practice View Defensible? A Review of Evidence and Discussion of Issues," 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "How Firm Are the Foundations of Mind-Set Theory? The Claims Appear Stronger Than the Evidence," 2020, Psychological Science
  • "What Makes a Champion? Early Multidisciplinary Practice, Not Early Specialization, Predicts World-Class Performance," 2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Predictors of Junior Versus Senior Elite Performance are Opposite: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Participation Patterns," 2022, Sports Medicine
  • "Quantifying the Extent to Which Successful Juniors and Successful Seniors are Two Disparate Populations: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Findings," 2023, Sports Medicine

Among frequent collaborators, their co-authors are:

  • Brooke N. Macnamara
  • Alexander P. Burgoyne
  • Arne Güllich
  • Michael Barth
  • Erik M. Altmann

Best Publications

  • The Generality of Working Memory Capacity: A Latent-Variable Approach to Verbal and Visuospatial Memory Span and Reasoning

    Michael J. Kane;David Z. Hambrick;Stephen W. Tuholski;Oliver Wilhelm

  • Do “Brain-Training” Programs Work?:

    Daniel J. Simons;Walter R. Boot;Neil Charness;Susan E. Gathercole

  • The Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity and Executive Functioning: Evidence for a Common Executive Attention Construct

    David P. McCabe;Henry L. Roediger Iii;Mark A. McDaniel;David A. Balota

  • Working Memory Capacity and Fluid Intelligence Are Strongly Related Constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005)

    Michael J. Kane;David Z. Hambrick;Andrew R. A. Conway

  • No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: A randomized, placebo-controlled study.

    Thomas S. Redick;Zach Shipstead;Tyler L. Harrison;Kenny L. Hicks

  • Deliberate Practice and Performance in Music, Games, Sports, Education, and Professions A Meta-Analysis

    Brooke N. Macnamara;David Z. Hambrick;Frederick L. Oswald

  • Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control.

    Michael J. Kane;Andrew R. A. Conway;David Z. Hambrick;Randall W. Engle

  • Deliberate practice: Is that all it takes to become an expert?

    David Z Hambrick;Frederick L. Oswald;Erik M Altmann;Elizabeth J. Meinz

  • The Relationship between the Broader Autism Phenotype, Child Severity, and Stress and Depression in Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders.

    Brooke Ingersoll;David Z. Hambrick

  • Working Memory Training May Increase Working Memory Capacity but Not Fluid Intelligence

    Tyler L. Harrison;Zach Shipstead;Kenny L. Hicks;David Z. Hambrick

  • Executive functions and ADHD in adults: evidence for selective effects on ADHD symptom domains.

    Joel T. Nigg;Gillian Stavro;Mark Ettenhofer;David Z. Hambrick

  • Relation of Task Switching to Speed, Age, and Fluid Intelligence

    Timothy A. Salthouse;Nathanael Fristoe;Katheryn E. McGuthry;David Z. Hambrick

  • Non-academic internet use in the classroom is negatively related to classroom learning regardless of intellectual ability

    Susan M. Ravizza;David Z. Hambrick;Kimberly M. Fenn

  • Interrelations of Age, Visual Acuity, and Cognitive Functioning

    Timothy A. Salthouse;Holly E. Hancock;Elizabeth J. Meinz;David Z. Hambrick

  • The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: a psychometric approach.

    Benjamin Swets;Timothy Desmet;David Z. Hambrick;Fernanda Ferreira

  • The Relationship Between Deliberate Practice and Performance in Sports A Meta-Analysis

    Brooke N. Macnamara;David Moreau;David Z. Hambrick

  • Momentary interruptions can derail the train of thought.

    Erik M. Altmann;J. Gregory Trafton;David Z. Hambrick

  • Age-related differences in cognition: The role of distraction control.

    Emily S. Darowski;Elizabeth Helder;Rose T. Zacks;Lynn Hasher

  • The development of a short domain-general measure of working memory capacity

    Frederick L. Oswald;Samuel T. McAbee;Thomas S. Redick;David Z. Hambrick

  • Event Segmentation Ability Uniquely Predicts Event Memory

    Jesse Q. Sargent;Jeffrey M. Zacks;David Z. Hambrick;Rose T. Zacks

  • Effects of domain knowledge, working memory capacity and age on cognitive performance

    David Z. Hambrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick L. Oswald
Frederick L. Oswald Rice University
Erik M. Altmann
Erik M. Altmann Michigan State University
Randall W. Engle
Randall W. Engle Georgia Institute of Technology
Michael J. Kane
Michael J. Kane University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Fernand Gobet
Fernand Gobet London School of Economics and Political Science
Thomas S. Redick
Thomas S. Redick Purdue University West Lafayette
Timothy A. Salthouse
Timothy A. Salthouse University of Virginia
Oliver Wilhelm
Oliver Wilhelm University of Ulm
Fredrik Ullén
Fredrik Ullén Karolinska Institute
Andrew R. A. Conway
Andrew R. A. Conway Claremont Graduate University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up a wide array of career pathways, including counseling, clinical psychology, and specialized fields such as marriage and family therapy. Many students choose to pursue their studies online for the flexibility and convenience, allowing them to balance coursework with work or family commitments.

One popular career route is becoming a marriage and family therapist (MFT). Each region may have unique education, licensing, and supervised experience requirements. For example, students interested in this field can learn more about mft requirements in Richmond, mft requirements in Riverside, and how to become a marriage and family therapist in Sacramento. Each city or state may set different standards for supervised hours, exams, and specific coursework.

Additionally, understanding how to become a marriage and family therapist in Saint Paul demonstrates how regional variations impact your path. No matter where you plan to practice, researching requirements in advance will help you plan your educational journey and ensure you meet all necessary qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing David Z. Hambrick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles