World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frederick L. Oswald

Frederick L. Oswald

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
18085
World Ranking
4896
National Ranking
2696

Frederick L. Oswald publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick L. Oswald sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 160 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Frederick L. Oswald D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick L. Oswald sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Frederick L. Oswald is affiliated with Rice University in the United States. Their research contributions span multiple areas within psychology and human factors, with significant output in both experimental and applied domains.

Oswald has published numerous papers across various respected venues. Some recent publications include:

  • Interpreting Multiple Linear Regression: A Guidebook of Variable Importance (2020), Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)
  • Multi-Language Toolkit for the System Usability Scale (2020), International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
  • Scientific, Legal, and Ethical Concerns About AI-Based Personnel Selection Tools: A Call to Action (2021), Personnel Assessment and Decisions
  • A template for preregistration of quantitative research in psychology: Report of the joint psychological societies preregistration task force (2021), American Psychologist
  • A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness (2021), CBE-Life Sciences Education

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Philip Kortum
  • Kevin A. Hoff
  • Meiyuzi Gao
  • James Rounds
  • Sylvia J. Hysong

Oswald has published extensively in the following venues:

  • Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Journal of Business and Psychology
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature

Their research fields involve:

  • General Health Professions
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Safety Research
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Main topics of Oswald's work cover:

  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Recognition received includes being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2013.

Best Publications

  • The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality.

    M. Brent Donnellan;Frederick L. Oswald;Brendan M. Baird;Richard E. Lucas

  • How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research

    Luke Plonsky;Frederick L. Oswald

  • Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: a meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies.

    Frederick L. Oswald;Gregory Mitchell;Hart Blanton;James Jaccard

  • Deliberate Practice and Performance in Music, Games, Sports, Education, and Professions A Meta-Analysis

    Brooke N. Macnamara;David Z. Hambrick;Frederick L. Oswald

  • Personnel selection: looking toward the future--remembering the past

    Leaetta M. Hough;Frederick L. Oswald

  • Determinants, Detection and Amelioration of Adverse Impact in Personnel Selection Procedures: Issues, Evidence and Lessons Learned

    Leaetta M. Hough;Frederick L. Oswald;Robert E. Ployhart

  • Deliberate practice: Is that all it takes to become an expert?

    David Z Hambrick;Frederick L. Oswald;Erik M Altmann;Elizabeth J. Meinz

  • Developing a biodata measure and situational judgment inventory as predictors of college student performance.

    Frederick L. Oswald;Neal Schmitt;Brian H. Kim;Lauren J. Ramsay

  • Mind-wandering, cognition, and performance: a theory-driven meta-analysis of attention regulation.

    Jason G. Randall;Frederick L. Oswald;Margaret E. Beier

  • Bayesian Estimation and Inference A User’s Guide

    Michael J. Zyphur;Frederick L. Oswald

  • Using the IAT to Predict Ethnic and Racial Discrimination: Small Effect Sizes of Unknown Societal Significance

    Frederick L. Oswald;Gregory Mitchell;Hart Blanton;James Jaccard

  • Meta-analysis in Second Language Research: Choices and Challenges

    Frederick L. Oswald;Luke Plonsky

  • Prediction of 4-year college student performance using cognitive and noncognitive predictors and the impact on demographic status of admitted students.

    Neal Schmitt;Jessica Keeney;Frederick L. Oswald;Timothy J. Pleskac

  • The development of a short domain-general measure of working memory capacity

    Frederick L. Oswald;Samuel T. McAbee;Thomas S. Redick;David Z. Hambrick

  • Personality Testing and Industrial–Organizational Psychology: Reflections, Progress, and Prospects

    Leaetta M. Hough;Frederick L. Oswald

  • The Multitasking Preference Inventory: Toward an Improved Measure of Individual Differences in Polychronicity

    Elizabeth M. Poposki;Frederick L. Oswald

  • A multidimensional approach for evaluating variables in organizational research and practice

    James M. LeBRETON;Michael B. Hargis;Brian Griepentrog;Frederick L. Oswald

  • Applications of Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis: Integrating Correlational and Experimental Approaches.

    Robert E. Ployhart;Frederick L. Oswald

  • Perceived fit with an academic environment: Attitudinal and behavioral outcomes

    Neal Schmitt;Frederick L. Oswald;Alyssa Friede;Anna Imus

  • Predictors of multitasking performance in a synthetic work paradigm

    David Z. Hambrick;Frederick L. Oswald;Emily S. Darowski;Tara A. Rench

  • The criterion-related validity of personality measures for predicting GPA: A meta-analytic validity competition.

    Samuel T. McAbee;Frederick L. Oswald

  • Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures

    Nancy Tippins;Paul Sackett;Fred Oswald

Frequent Co-Authors

Neal Schmitt
Neal Schmitt Michigan State University
David Z. Hambrick
David Z. Hambrick Michigan State University
Philip Kortum
Philip Kortum Rice University
Luke Plonsky
Luke Plonsky Northern Arizona University
Fernand Gobet
Fernand Gobet London School of Economics and Political Science
Steven G. Rogelberg
Steven G. Rogelberg University of North Carolina at Charlotte
James Jaccard
James Jaccard New York University
Hart Blanton
Hart Blanton Texas A&M University
Erik M. Altmann
Erik M. Altmann Michigan State University
Philip E. Tetlock
Philip E. Tetlock University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of career paths, especially in the field of addiction counseling. Many students considering online psychology programs are interested in roles that support individuals overcoming substance abuse. This profession is growing nationwide, but specific requirements can differ based on location.

For those interested in serving their communities, it’s important to research credentialing and educational pathways in your desired region. For example, you can discover more about substance abuse counselor requirements in Garland, or gain an understanding of how to become a substance abuse counselor in Gilbert.

Different cities and states may require unique training, internships, or certification exams. If you’re considering working in Glendale, review the substance abuse counselor requirements in Glendale. Additionally, aspiring professionals can research pathways for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Greensboro.

These resources will help you make informed decisions about potential career directions and the qualifications needed for each path within the diverse psychology sector.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick L. Oswald

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles