World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 47 3333 3066 1610 1458 151 11888

Luke Plonsky publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Luke Plonsky between 2006 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Luke Plonsky published across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2020. 21 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2020. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 33 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 20 publications 2026: 1 publication
2006 2026

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Luke Plonsky: publications per year, 2006 to 2026
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 1
2008 1
2009 1
2010 4
2011 5
2012 1
2013 5
2014 6
2015 15
2016 7
2017 6
2018 13
2019 8
2020 33
2021 16
2022 16
2023 11
2024 10
2025 20
2026 1
Total 181
Download as CSV

Luke Plonsky publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luke Plonsky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 144–153 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 151 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407 151
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Luke Plonsky D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luke Plonsky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251 47
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research

    Luke Plonsky;Frederick L. Oswald

  • Second Language Anxiety and Achievement: A Meta-Analysis.

    Yasser Teimouri;Julia Goetze;Luke Plonsky

  • The Effectiveness of Second Language Pronunciation Instruction: A Meta-analysis

    Junkyu Lee;Juhyun Jang;Luke Plonsky

  • The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta-analysis

    Luke Plonsky

  • L2 grit: Passion and perseverance for second-language learning:

    Yasser Teimouri;Luke Plonsky;Farhad Tabandeh

  • Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes: The Case of Interaction Research

    Luke Plonsky;Susan Gass

  • Study quality in SLA

    Luke Plonsky

  • Meta-analysis in Second Language Research: Choices and Challenges

    Frederick L. Oswald;Luke Plonsky

  • Reporting and Interpreting Quantitative Research Findings: What Gets Reported and Recommendations for the Field.

    Jenifer Larson-Hall;Luke Plonsky

  • Effects of Second Language Pronunciation Teaching Revisited: A Proposed Measurement Framework and Meta-Analysis

    Kazuya Saito;Luke Plonsky

  • Second Language Acquisition

    Unknown

  • Advancing Quantitative Methods in Second Language Research

    Luke Plonsky

  • Study quality in quantitative l2 research (1990-2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform

    Luke Plonsky

  • An A–Z of Applied Linguistics Research Methods

    Shawn Loewen;Luke Plonsky

  • A Meta-Analysis of Reliability Coefficients in Second Language Research

    Luke Plonsky;Deirdre J. Derrick

  • Eta- and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage:

    Reza Norouzian;Luke D Plonsky

  • Second Language Acquisition

    Susan Gass

  • Guidelines for Reporting Quantitative Methods and Results in Primary Research

    John M. Norris;Luke Plonsky;Steven J. Ross;Rob Schoonen

  • Second Language Acquisition

    Unknown

  • Task-Based Learner Production: A Substantive and Methodological Review

    Luke Plonsky;YouJin Kim

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan M. Gass
Susan M. Gass Michigan State University
Frederick L. Oswald
Frederick L. Oswald Rice University
Shawn Loewen
Shawn Loewen Michigan State University
John M. Norris
John M. Norris Educational Testing Service
Kazuya Saito
Kazuya Saito University College London
Alison Mackey
Alison Mackey Georgetown University
Gregory R. Hancock
Gregory R. Hancock University of Maryland, College Park
Rob Schoonen
Rob Schoonen Radboud University
Marc Brysbaert
Marc Brysbaert Ghent University
Lourdes Ortega
Lourdes Ortega Georgetown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Luke Plonsky

Recently Published Articles