World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
79
Citations
33814
World Ranking
1483
National Ranking
887

Neal Schmitt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neal Schmitt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 227 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Neal Schmitt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neal Schmitt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science
  • 1983 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Neal Schmitt is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research contributions are primarily documented through publications in established academic venues.

A notable recent paper authored by Neal Schmitt is titled From alpha to omega and beyond! A look at the past, present, and (possible) future of psychometric soundness in the Journal of Applied Psychology, published in 2020 within the Journal of Applied Psychology. This paper has received 153 citations.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Neal Schmitt include:

  • José M. Cortina
  • Zitong Sheng
  • Sheila K. Keener
  • Kathleen R. Keeler
  • Leah Katell Grubb

Neal Schmitt's work has appeared predominantly in the Journal of Applied Psychology.

  • Journal of Applied Psychology

The scientist has been recognized by professional organizations with awards such as:

  • James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (2014)
  • Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) (1983)

Best Publications

  • Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha.

    Neal Schmitt

  • THE INFLUENCE OF TRAINEE ATTITUDES ON TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS: TEST OF A MODEL

    Raymond A. Noe;Neal Schmitt

  • METAANALYSES OF VALIDITY STUDIES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1964 AND 1982 AND THE INVESTIGATION OF STUDY CHARACTERISTICS

    Neal Schmitt;Richard Z. Gooding;Raymond A. Noe;Michael Kirsch

  • Gender and the Internet: Women Communicating and Men Searching

    Linda A. Jackson;Kelly S. Ervin;Philip D. Gardner;Neal Schmitt

  • RECONSIDERING THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION CONTEXTS

    Frederick P. Morgeson;Michael A. Campion;Robert L. Dipboye;John R. Hollenbeck

  • AN EXPLORATORY EXAMINATION OF PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: ORGANIZATIONAL GOAL CONGRUENCE

    Jeffrey B. Vancouver;Neal W. Schmitt

  • Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications

    Neal Schmitt;Goran Kuljanin

  • The “Science of the Sophomore” Revisited: from Conjecture to Empiricism

    Michael E. Gordon;L. Allen Slade;Neal Schmitt

  • Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questions

    J.Kevin Ford;Neal Schmitt;Susan L Schechtman;Brian M Hults

  • Configurations of Organizational Effectiveness and Efficiency

    Cheri Ostroff;Neal Schmitt

  • Factors defined by negatively keyed items: The result of careless respondents?

    Neal Schmitt;Daniel M. Stults

  • Human resource practices, organizational climate, and customer satisfaction

    Kirk L. Rogg;David B. Schmidt;Carla Shull;Neal Schmitt

  • Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale.

    M Holmes-Rovner;J Kroll;N Schmitt;D R Rovner

  • Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability

    Elaine D. Pulakos;Neal Schmitt;David W. Dorsey;Sharon Arad

  • Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions.

    David Chan;Neal Schmitt

  • High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing, and higher education. Prospects in a post-affirmative-action world.

    Paul R. Sackett;Neal Schmitt;Jill E. Ellingson;Melissa B. Kabin

  • Social and Situational Determinants of Interview Decisions: Implications for the Employment Interview.

    Neal Schmitt

  • Methodology review: Analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices

    Neal Schmitt;Daniel M. Stults

  • Personnel Selection: A Theoretical Approach

    Neal W Schmitt;David Chan

  • Interindividual differences in intraindividual changes in proactivity during organizational entry: a latent growth modeling approach to understanding newcomer adaptation.

    David Chan;Neal Schmitt

  • Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences.

    Neal Schmitt;Edwin E. Ghiselli;John P. Campbell;Sheldon Zedeck

Frequent Co-Authors

David Chan
David Chan Singapore Management University
Frederick L. Oswald
Frederick L. Oswald Rice University
Ann Marie Ryan
Ann Marie Ryan Michigan State University
Robert E. Ployhart
Robert E. Ployhart University of South Carolina
Raymond A. Noe
Raymond A. Noe The Ohio State University
Richard P. DeShon
Richard P. DeShon Michigan State University
Paul R. Sackett
Paul R. Sackett University of Minnesota
Cheri Ostroff
Cheri Ostroff University of South Australia
J. Kevin Ford
J. Kevin Ford Michigan State University
Jose M. Cortina
Jose M. Cortina Virginia Commonwealth University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of related fields, with counseling being one of the most sought-after career pathways. Students interested in flexible learning can explore accredited online programs that offer courses in counseling, mental health, and behavioral science. For those concerned about tuition costs, the most affordable online counseling degree programs ranking in America highlights top options across the country.

Location can also play a big role in your educational and career journey. Students in the Southwest might consider programs in the region, with the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Arizona offering a variety of specializations. If you're located on the West Coast, the best-ranked counseling degree programs in California provide some of the state's most reputable online and hybrid options.

For those studying in major urban centers, the popular counseling degrees in Chicago showcase urban programs that prepare graduates for both local and national opportunities in counseling and mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Neal Schmitt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles