World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
79
Citations
30228
World Ranking
1490
National Ranking
892

Paul R. Sackett publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul R. Sackett sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 292 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paul R. Sackett D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul R. Sackett sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul R. Sackett is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research predominantly falls within the social sciences, with a strong focus on public health, environmental and occupational health, gender studies, sociology and political science, clinical psychology, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

The scientist's recent work has been published in highly recognized journals, including the Journal of Applied Psychology, Personnel Psychology, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Personality and Individual Differences, and PLoS ONE. Some of their notable recent papers are:

  • Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range, 2021, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Personnel selection: A review of ways to maximize validity, diversity, and the applicant experience, 2023, Personnel Psychology
  • Improving Our Ability to Predict Resident Applicant Performance: Validity Evidence for a Situational Judgment Test, 2020, Teaching and Learning in Medicine
  • Why women STEM majors are less likely than men to persist in completing a STEM degree: More than the individual, 2022, Personality and Individual Differences
  • The process of attrition in pre-medical studies: A large-scale analysis across 102 schools, 2020, PLoS ONE

The frequent coauthors of Paul R. Sackett include Charlene Zhang, Filip Lievens, Nathan R. Kuncel, You Zhou, and Christopher M. Berry, reflecting collaborative engagements across multiple publications.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the following publication venues:

  • Journal of Applied Psychology (13 publications)
  • International Journal of Selection and Assessment (6 publications)
  • Applied Measurement in Education (5 publications)
  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology (4 publications)
  • Academic Medicine (3 publications)

The main fields of study that Paul R. Sackett works in include social sciences, with subfields such as public health, environmental and occupational health, gender studies, sociology and political science, clinical psychology, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

The principal topics in their research encompass:

  • Medical education and admissions
  • Innovations in medical education
  • Diversity and career in medicine
  • Gender diversity and inequality
  • Psychometric methodologies and testing
  • Personality traits and psychology
  • Job satisfaction and organizational behavior

Best Publications

  • The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: a policy-capturing approach.

    Maria Rotundo;Paul R. Sackett

  • Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: a review and meta-analysis.

    Christopher M. Berry;Deniz S. Ones;Paul R. Sackett

  • Investigating the Dimensionality of Counterproductive Work Behavior

    Melissa L. Gruys;Paul R. Sackett

  • Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology.

    Paul R. Sackett;James R. Larson Jr.

  • The Structure of Counterproductive Work Behaviors: Dimensionality and Relationships with Facets of Job Performance

    Paul R. Sackett

  • A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.

    Amanda J. Koch;Susan D. D'Mello;Paul R. Sackett

  • High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing, and higher education. Prospects in a post-affirmative-action world.

    Paul R. Sackett;Neal Schmitt;Jill E. Ellingson;Melissa B. Kabin

  • How Are We Doing After 30 Years? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Antecedents and Outcomes of Feedback-Seeking Behavior

    Frederik Anseel;Adam S. Beatty;Winny Shen;Filip Lievens

  • A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.

    Maria Rotundo;Dung-Hanh Nguyen;Paul R. Sackett

  • Relations Between Measures of Typical and Maximum Job Performance

    Paul R. Sackett;Sheldon Zedeck;Larry Fogli

  • Social desirability corrections in personality measurement : Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity

    Jill E. Ellingson;Paul R. Sackett;Leaetta M. Hough

  • Counterproductive behaviors at work

    Paul R. Sackett;Cynthia J. DeVore

  • Correction for range restriction: an expanded typology.

    Paul R. Sackett;Hyuckseung Yang

  • Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings

    Paul R. Sackett;George F. Dreher

  • INTEGRITY TESTING FOR PERSONNEL SELECTION: AN UPDATE

    Paul R. Sackett;Laura R. Burris;Christine Callahan

  • Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and White-Black differences in performance ratings.

    Paul R Sackett;Cathy L.Z. DuBois;Ann Wiggins Noe

  • Citizenship and Counterproductive Behavior: Clarifying Relations Between the Two Domains

    Paul R. Sackett;Christopher M. Berry;Shelly A. Wiemann;Roxanne M. Laczo

  • NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN THE USE OF MEASURES OF HONESTY INTEGRITY, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, DEPENDABILITY TRUSTWORTHINESS, AND RELIABILITY FOR PERSONNEL SELECTION

    Paul R. Sackett;James E. Wanek;James E. Wanek

  • Within-group norming and other forms of score adjustment in preemployment testing.

    Paul R. Sackett;Steffanie L. Wilk

  • Factors related to the satisfaction and performance of temporary employees.

    Jill E. Ellingson;Melissa L. Gruys;Paul R. Sackett

Frequent Co-Authors

Nathan R. Kuncel
Nathan R. Kuncel University of Minnesota
Filip Lievens
Filip Lievens Singapore Management University
Ann Marie Ryan
Ann Marie Ryan Michigan State University
George F. Dreher
George F. Dreher Indiana University
Richard D. Arvey
Richard D. Arvey National University of Singapore
Jesús F. Salgado
Jesús F. Salgado University of Santiago de Compostela
Cornelius J. König
Cornelius J. König Saarland University
Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko
Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko Nanyang Technological University
Peter Bamberger
Peter Bamberger Tel Aviv University
Neal Schmitt
Neal Schmitt Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of career options. Many graduates pursue roles as substance abuse counselors—a field experiencing steady demand across the United States. Whether you wish to practice in urban environments or smaller cities, it’s important to understand the specific requirements and pathway to licensure in your chosen location.

For instance, if you are interested in learning how to become a substance abuse counselor in Kansas City, you will need to meet the state’s educational criteria and gain relevant clinical experience. Similarly, exploring Laredo substance abuse counselor certification requirements ensures you are aware of unique regional standards. Each city, from becoming a substance abuse counselor in Las Vegas to Lexington substance abuse counselors education requirements, may have different pathways based on local laws and available programs.

If you’re considering an online psychology degree, review state-specific requirements and ensure your chosen program aligns with your career goals. This approach will provide flexibility while ensuring you qualify for licensure and job opportunities no matter where you plan to work.

Best Scientists Citing Paul R. Sackett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles