World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko

Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
7122
World Ranking
9116
National Ranking
19

Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 77 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko is affiliated with Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. Their research spans several interconnected fields with a focus on psychology and its applications in various domains.

Their work primarily covers the field of Psychology, with significant contributions in Clinical Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Mechanical Engineering. The integration of multiple disciplines reflects a broad interest in both human behavior and applied research.

The main topics explored in Chernyshenko's research include:

  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
  • Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing

The scientist has published in various venues, with a frequent presence in the following journals and proceedings:

  • Military Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Bulletin of Kharkov National Automobile and Highway University
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Ecological Sciences

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko demonstrate a focus on psychological assessment, personality, and vocational interests as they relate to leadership and military contexts. These papers include:

  • "Motivation to Lead as Mediator of Relations Between the Dark Triad, Big Five, and Leadership Intention," 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Adaptive vocational interest diagnostic: Informing and improving the job assignment process," 2020, Military Psychology
  • "Examining personality for the selection and classification of soldiers: Validity and differential validity across jobs," 2020, Military Psychology
  • "Predictors of attitudes and performance in U.S. Army recruiters: Does personality matter?", 2020, Military Psychology
  • "The dynamic loads, which arise in main beam of bridge crane," 2021, Bulletin of Kharkov National Automobile and Highway University

Chernyshenko frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Christopher D. Nye
  • Fritz Drasgow
  • Stephen Stark
  • Leonard A. White
  • Jeffrey C. Kennedy

Best Publications

  • THE STRUCTURE OF CONSCIENTIOUSNESS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION BASED ON SEVEN MAJOR PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRES

    Brent W. Roberts;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Stephen Stark;Lewis R. Goldberg

  • Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.

    Stephen Stark;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Fritz Drasgow

  • Fitting Item Response Theory Models to Two Personality Inventories: Issues and Insights

    Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Stephen Stark;Kim Yin Chan;Fritz Drasgow

  • Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?

    Stephen Stark;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Fritz Drasgow;Bruce A. Williams

  • Job satisfaction as mediator: An assessment of job satisfaction's position within the nomological network

    Marcus Crede;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Stephen Stark;Reeshad S. Dalal

  • Effects of the testing situation on item responding : Cause for concern

    Stephen Stark;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Kim Yin Chan;Wayne C. Lee

  • An IRT Approach to Constructing and Scoring Pairwise Preference Items Involving Stimuli on Different Dimensions: The Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise-Preference Model

    Stephen Stark;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Fritz Drasgow

  • Proactivity, adaptability and boundaryless career attitudes: The mediating role of entrepreneurial alertness

    Marilyn A. Uy;Kim-Yin Chan;Yoke Loo Sam;Moon-ho Ringo Ho

  • Openness to Experience: its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence.

    Sang Eun Woo;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Andrew Longley;Zhi-Xue Zhang

  • A lexical investigation of the lower-order structure of conscientiousness.

    Brent W. Roberts;Tim Bogg;Kate E. Walton;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko

  • Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: Toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures

    Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Stephen Stark;Fritz Drasgow;Brent W. Roberts

  • Social and emotional skills for student success and well-being: Conceptual framework for the OECD study on social and emotional skills

    Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Miloš Kankaraš;Fritz Drasgow

  • Examining the effects of differential item (functioning and differential) test functioning on selection decisions: when are statistically significant effects practically important?

    Stephen Stark;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Fritz Drasgow

  • 75 Years After Likert: Thurstone Was Right!

    Fritz Drasgow;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Stephen Stark

  • Entrepreneurship, professionalism, leadership : a framework and measure for understanding boundaryless careers

    Kim-Yin Chan;Moon-ho R. Ho;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Olwen Bedford

  • Toward standardized measurement of sexual harassment: Shortening the SEQ-DoD using item response theory.

    Stephen Stark;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Anita R. Lancaster;Fritz Drasgow

  • International Perspectives on the Legal Environment for Selection

    Brett Myors;Filip Lievens;Eveline Schollaert;Greet Van Hoye

  • From ABLE to TAPAS: A New Generation of Personality Tests to Support Military Selection and Classification Decisions

    Stephen Stark;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Fritz Drasgow;Christopher D. Nye

  • Introducing the Special Section on Openness to Experience: Review of Openness Taxonomies, Measurement, and Nomological Net

    Brian S. Connelly;Deniz S. Ones;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko

  • Comparing two career adaptability measures for career construction theory : relations with boundaryless mindset and protean career attitudes

    Kim Yin Chan;Marilyn A. Uy;Moon-Ho Ringo Ho;Y.L. Sam

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen Stark
Stephen Stark University of South Florida
Fritz Drasgow
Fritz Drasgow University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Moon-Ho Ringo Ho
Moon-Ho Ringo Ho Nanyang Technological University
Jesús F. Salgado
Jesús F. Salgado University of Santiago de Compostela
Peter Bamberger
Peter Bamberger Tel Aviv University
Filip Lievens
Filip Lievens Singapore Management University
Cornelius J. König
Cornelius J. König Saarland University
Paul R. Sackett
Paul R. Sackett University of Minnesota
Brent W. Roberts
Brent W. Roberts University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Neil Anderson
Neil Anderson University of Bradford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide array of online degrees and careers. For those interested in business environments, learning about what can you do with a psychology degree in business reveals opportunities in management, human resources, and organizational development.

Cost is often a concern for graduate studies. Many students seek affordable psyd online programs to balance quality education with manageable tuition. These options make advanced clinical psychology training more accessible.

If you’re fascinated by the intersection of law and psychology, there is strong demand for professionals in criminal psychology jobs. These roles support law enforcement, the legal system, and offer insight into criminal behavior.

Considering counseling or advocacy roles? It’s important to understand the differences between a masters in counseling vs social work degree. Each pathway prepares you for distinct but rewarding careers helping individuals and communities in need.

Best Scientists Citing Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles