World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
82
Citations
29119
World Ranking
1314
National Ranking
792

Fritz Drasgow publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fritz Drasgow sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 231 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Fritz Drasgow D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fritz Drasgow sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 1988 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Fritz Drasgow is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology, with a focus on several subfields including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their work covers a broad range of topics such as Personality Traits and Psychology, Cognitive Abilities and Testing, Mental Health Research Topics, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Career Development and Diversity, Defense, Military, and Policy Studies, and Emotional Intelligence and Performance.

Drasgow has contributed numerous publications across various journals, with frequent appearances in Military Psychology, Organizational Research Methods, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Multivariate Behavioral Research, and Journal of Business and Psychology.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Using Bifactor Models to Examine the Predictive Validity of Hierarchical Constructs: Pros, Cons, and Solutions (2020) in Organizational Research Methods
  • Misfit matters: A re-examination of interest fit and job satisfaction (2020) in Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Faking Detection Improved: Adopting a Likert Item Response Process Tree Model (2021) in Organizational Research Methods
  • Small but Nontrivial: A Comparison of Six Strategies to Handle Cross-Loadings in Bifactor Predictive Models (2021) in Multivariate Behavioral Research
  • Adaptive vocational interest diagnostic: Informing and improving the job assignment process (2020) in Military Psychology

Drasgow has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, notable among them are Bo Zhang, Tianjun Sun, Mengyang Cao, Christopher D. Nye, and Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko.

Their research contributions have been recognized with distinctions including being named Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 1988 and Fellow of the American Educational Research Association in 2008.

Best Publications

  • The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors

    Josh A. Arnold;Sharon Arad;Jonathan A. Rhoades;Fritz Drasgow

  • The antecedents and consequences of sexual harrassment in organizations: An integrated model.

    Louise F. Fitzgerald;Charles L. Hulin;Fritz Drasgow

  • Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: Understanding the motivation to lead.

    Kim Yin Chan;Fritz Drasgow

  • A Meta-Analytic Study of Social Desirability Distortion in Computer- Administered Questionnaires, Traditional Questionnaires, and Interviews

    Wendy L. Richman;Sara Kiesler;Suzanne Weisband;Fritz Drasgow

  • Measuring Sexual Harassment: Theoretical and Psychometric Advances

    Louise F. Fitzgerald;Michele J. Gelfand;Fritz Drasgow

  • Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model.

    Louise F. Fitzgerald;Fritz Drasgow;Charles L. Hulin;Michele J. Gelfand;Michele J. Gelfand

  • Empowerment and continuous improvement in the United States, Mexico, Poland, and India: Predicting fit on the basis of the dimensions of power distance and individualism.

    Christopher Robert;Tahira M. Probst;Joseph J. Martocchio;Fritz Drasgow

  • Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis.

    Alan D. Mead;Fritz Drasgow

  • Appropriateness measurement with polychotomous item response models and standardized indices

    Fritz Drasgow;Michael V. Levine;Esther A. Williams

  • The Structure of Sexual Harassment: A Confirmatory Analysis across Cultures and Settings

    Michelle J. Gelfand;Louise F. Fitzgerald;Fritz Drasgow

  • Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.

    Stephen Stark;Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko;Fritz Drasgow

  • A Revision of the Job Diagnostic Survey: Elimination of a Measurement Artifact

    Jacqueline R. Idaszak;Fritz Drasgow

  • Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations.

    Fritz Drasgow;Ruth Kanfer

  • Vocational Interests and Performance: A Quantitative Summary of Over 60 Years of Research

    Christopher D. Nye;Rong Su;James Rounds;Fritz Drasgow

  • Ambient Sexual Harassment: An Integrated Model of Antecedents and Consequences☆☆☆

    Theresa M Glomb;Wendy L Richman;Charles L Hulin;Fritz Drasgow

  • Item response theory : application to psychological measurement

    Charles L. Hulin;Fritz Drasgow;Charles K. Parsons

  • Measuring Sexual Harassment in the Military: The Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ—DoD)

    Louise F. Fitzgerald;Vicki J. Magley;Fritz Drasgow;Craig R. Waldo

  • Psychological Testing on the Internet: New Problems, Old Issues.

    Jack A. Naglieri;Fritz Drasgow;Mark Schmit;Len Handler

  • The polyserial correlation coefficient.

    Ulf Olsson;Fritz Drasgow;Neil J. Dorans

  • Application of Unidimensional Item Response Theory Models to Multidimensional Data

    Fritz Drasgow;Charles K. Parsons

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen Stark
Stephen Stark University of South Florida
Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko
Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko Nanyang Technological University
Charles L. Hulin
Charles L. Hulin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Louise Fitzgerald
Louise Fitzgerald University of Oxford
Louis Tay
Louis Tay Purdue University West Lafayette
James Rounds
James Rounds University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Louise F. Fitzgerald
Louise F. Fitzgerald University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Brent W. Roberts
Brent W. Roberts University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jack A. Naglieri
Jack A. Naglieri University of Virginia
Michele J. Gelfand
Michele J. Gelfand Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of rewarding and impactful career paths. One growing field is substance abuse counseling, which is in high demand across the United States. Qualification requirements and certification processes can vary by location and state, making it essential for aspiring counselors to understand regional nuances.

For example, if you want to work in California, you’ll need to review the specific Sacramento substance abuse counselor certification requirements or see what’s involved in the how to become a substance abuse counselor in San Diego guide. Similarly, each state or city may have its own process. Those interested in Minnesota can consult how to become a substance abuse counselor in Saint Paul, while Texans should check San Antonio substance abuse counselor certification requirements.

Many online psychology degrees can help you fulfill educational prerequisites for these pathways, offering flexibility and access to students nationwide. Exploring local requirements is key to ensuring your chosen degree meets licensing standards for your future career in counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Fritz Drasgow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles