World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 3961 3652 2221 2000 115 18969

Lilia M. Cortina publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lilia M. Cortina between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lilia M. Cortina published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2016. 3 of the 124 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2016. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1998 2025

124 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lilia M. Cortina: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 2
2002 8
2003 2
2004 2
2005 3
2006 5
2007 3
2008 7
2009 1
2010 3
2011 4
2012 5
2013 9
2014 6
2015 5
2016 14
2017 9
2018 10
2019 5
2020 8
2021 7
2022 1
2023 1
2024 2
2025 1
Total 124
Download as CSV

Lilia M. Cortina publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lilia M. Cortina sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 115
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lilia M. Cortina D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lilia M. Cortina sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lilia M. Cortina is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on social sciences, with significant contributions in gender studies and sociology and political science. Additional subfields include general health professions, organizational behavior and human resource management, and demography.

The main topics covered in their work involve sexual assault and victimization studies, workplace violence and bullying, social and intergroup psychology, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, diversity and career in medicine, employment and welfare studies, and gender, security, and conflict.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Cortina include Isis H. Settles, M. Sandy Hershcovis, Emily A. Vargas, Sheila T. Brassel, and Timothy R.B. Johnson.

Their research has been published across several venues, with multiple papers in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and the Academy of Management Proceedings. Other venues include the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, the Journal of Applied Psychology, and the Journal of Management.

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by Lilia M. Cortina are:

  • Putting People Down and Pushing Them Out: Sexual Harassment in the Workplace, 2020, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • The Embodiment of Insult: A Theory of Biobehavioral Response to Workplace Incivility, 2021, Journal of Management
  • See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil: Theorizing network silence around sexual harassment, 2021, Journal of Applied Psychology (coauthored with M. Sandy Hershcovis)
  • Use science to stop sexual harassment in higher education, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (coauthored with Kathryn B. H. Clancy)
  • Social and situational dynamics surrounding workplace mistreatment: Context matters, 2020, Journal of Organizational Behavior (coauthored with M. Sandy Hershcovis)

Best Publications

  • Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact.

    Lilia M. Cortina;Vicki J. Magley;Jill Hunter Williams;Regina Day Langhout

  • Personal and workgroup incivility: impact on work and health outcomes.

    Sandy Lim;Lilia M. Cortina;Vicki J. Magley

  • Unseen Injustice: Incivility as Modern Discrimination in Organizations

    Lilia M. Cortina

  • Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: the interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment.

    Sandy Lim;Lilia M. Cortina

  • Selective Incivility as Modern Discrimination in Organizations Evidence and Impact

    Lilia M. Cortina;Dana Kabat-Farr;Emily A. Leskinen;Marisela Huerta

  • Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace.

    Lilia M. Cortina;Vicki J. Magley

  • Patterns and profiles of response to incivility in the workplace.

    Lilia M. Cortina;Vicki J. Magley

  • THE CLIMATE FOR WOMEN IN ACADEMIC SCIENCE: THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE CHANGEABLE

    Isis H. Settles;Lilia M. Cortina;Janet Malley;Abigail J. Stewart

  • The (un)reasonableness of reporting: antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment.

    Mindy E. Bergman;Regina Day Langhout;Patrick A. Palmieri;Lilia M. Cortina

  • Researching rudeness: The past, present, and future of the science of incivility

    Lilia M. Cortina;Dana Kabat-Farr;Vicki J. Magley;Kerri Nelson

  • From Insult to Injury: Explaining the Impact of Incivility

    Brianna Barker Caza;Lilia M. Cortina

  • Slurs, Snubs, and Queer Jokes: Incidence and Impact of Heterosexist Harassment in Academia

    Perry Silverschanz;Lilia M. Cortina;Julie Konik;Vicki J. Magley

  • Gender, victimization, and outcomes: reconceptualizing risk.

    Sheryl Pimlott-Kubiak;Lilia M. Cortina

  • Beyond targets: Consequences of vicarious exposure to misogyny at work.

    Kathi Miner-Rubino;Lilia M. Cortina

  • What's Gender Got to Do with It? Incivility in the Federal Courts

    Lilia M. Cortina;Kimberly A. Lonsway;Vicki J. Magley;Leslie V. Freeman

  • Profiles in coping: responses to sexual harassment across persons, organizations, and cultures.

    Lilia M. Cortina;S. Arzu Wasti

  • Working in a context of hostility toward women: implications for employees' well-being.

    Kathi Miner-Rubino;Lilia M. Cortina

  • Comparing victim attributions and outcomes for workplace aggression and sexual harassment.

    M. Sandy Hershcovis;Julian Barling

  • Gender Harassment: Broadening Our Understanding of Sex-Based Harassment at Work

    Emily A. Leskinen;Lilia M. Cortina;Dana B. Kabat

  • Sexual Harassment and Assault: Chilling the Climate for Women in Academia

    Lilia M. Cortina;Suzanne Swan;Louise F. Fitzgerald;Craig Waldo

Frequent Co-Authors

Isis H. Settles
Isis H. Settles University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Louise Fitzgerald
Louise Fitzgerald University of Oxford
Reshma Jagsi
Reshma Jagsi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Abigail J. Stewart
Abigail J. Stewart University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gwenith G. Fisher
Gwenith G. Fisher Colorado State University
Louise F. Fitzgerald
Louise F. Fitzgerald University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jennifer J. Freyd
Jennifer J. Freyd University of Oregon
Fritz Drasgow
Fritz Drasgow University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Ann Marie Ryan
Ann Marie Ryan Michigan State University
Jose M. Cortina
Jose M. Cortina Virginia Commonwealth University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of online programs and career paths, especially in counseling and mental health services. Substance abuse counseling is a rapidly growing field and can be accessed through both online and on-campus programs. Each location in the USA can have specific certification and educational requirements for those interested in this career.

For example, if you are considering working in Arizona, Tucson substance abuse counselor certification requirements outline the education and supervised experience needed to get started. In Oklahoma, the process of becoming a substance abuse counselor in Tulsa involves meeting both academic and state-specific licensure prerequisites.

Similarly, Virginia Beach substance abuse counselors education requirements detail the qualifications for practice in that region, while Washington DC substance abuse counselors education requirements emphasize the need for advanced degrees and professional development.

Online degrees in psychology or counseling provide flexible options to meet these regional requirements and help you launch a fulfilling career in mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Lilia M. Cortina

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles