World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 63 3050 2807 1737 1563 127 27816

Louise F. Fitzgerald publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Louise F. Fitzgerald between 1978 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Louise F. Fitzgerald published across 45 years, from 1978 to 2022, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 1994. 1 of the 174 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 1994. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 16 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1978 2022

174 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Louise F. Fitzgerald: publications per year, 1978 to 2022
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 1
1980 2
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 2
1985 2
1986 4
1987 2
1988 5
1989 4
1990 3
1991 3
1992 3
1993 6
1994 16
1995 8
1996 8
1997 6
1998 3
1999 10
2000 3
2001 5
2002 13
2003 4
2004 0
2005 7
2006 1
2007 3
2008 3
2009 6
2010 5
2011 5
2012 5
2013 5
2014 2
2015 2
2016 6
2017 2
2018 4
2019 2
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
Total 174
Download as CSV

Louise F. Fitzgerald publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise F. Fitzgerald sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 127
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Louise F. Fitzgerald D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise F. Fitzgerald sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 63
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Louise F. Fitzgerald is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and psychology, focusing on clinical applications and workforce health issues.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • "Are health care assistants part of the long-term solution to the nursing workforce deficit in Kenya?" (2020) in Human Resources for Health
  • "Menopause in the workplace; what's everyone getting in a sweat about" (2023) in Occupational Medicine
  • "Computerized Test Interpretation of the MMPI-2 in the Forensic Context: A Time to Use Your Head and Not the Formula?" (2022) in Psychological Injury and Law
  • "1181 Enhancing Patient-Centered Care: A Pharmacy-Led Approach to Hypertension Management through the HBMP Program" (2025) in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association

Fitzgerald's work involves collaboration with several frequent co-authors, including Aoife M. McDermott, Ariel C. Avgar, Paula Hyde, David Gathara, and Jacob McKnight. These collaborations indicate engagement across diverse research topics and interdisciplinary approaches.

Frequent venues for publication include:

  • Human Resources for Health
  • Occupational Medicine
  • Psychological Injury and Law
  • Journal of the American Pharmacists Association

The scientist's main fields of study cover:

  • Medicine
  • Psychology

Their research also extends into subfields such as:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Emergency Medical Services
  • General Health Professions
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Key topics addressed in Fitzgerald's work include:

  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Phytoestrogen effects and research
  • Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Psychological Testing and Assessment

Best Publications

  • The New Public Management in Action

    Ewan Ferlie;Lynn Ashburner;Louise Fitzgerald;Andrew Pettigrew

  • Rape Myths In Review

    Kimberly A. Lonsway;Louise F. Fitzgerald

  • The Career psychology of women

    Nancy E. Betz;Louise F. Fitzgerald

  • Performance Measurement in Service Businesses

    T. J. Brignall;L. Fitzgerald;R. Johnston;Rhian Silvestro

  • The Nonspread of Innovations: the Mediating Role of Professionals

    Ewan Ferlie;Louise Fitzgerald;Martin Wood;Chris Hawkins

  • The antecedents and consequences of sexual harrassment in organizations: An integrated model.

    Louise F. Fitzgerald;Charles L. Hulin;Fritz Drasgow

  • The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace.

    Louise F Fitzgerald;Sandra L Shullman;Nancy Bailey;Margaret Richards

  • No Safe Haven: Male Violence Against Women at Home, at Work, and in the Community

    Mary P. Koss;Lisa A. Goodman;Angela Browne;Louise F. Fitzgerald

  • Measuring Sexual Harassment: Theoretical and Psychometric Advances

    Louise F. Fitzgerald;Michele J. Gelfand;Fritz Drasgow

  • Towards a Classification of Service Processes

    Rhian Silvestro;Lin Fitzgerald;Robert Johnston;Christopher Voss

  • Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model.

    Louise F. Fitzgerald;Fritz Drasgow;Charles L. Hulin;Michele J. Gelfand;Michele J. Gelfand

  • Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination.

    Kimberly A. Lonsway;Louise F. Fitzgerald

  • Job-Related and Psychological Effects of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Empirical Evidence From Two Organizations

    Kimberly T. Schneider;Suzanne Swan;Louise F. Fitzgerald

  • Sexual harassment: Violence against women in the workplace.

    Louise F. Fitzgerald

  • Why Didn't She Just Report Him? The Psychological and Legal Implications of Women's Responses to Sexual Harassment

    Louise F. Fitzgerald;Suzanne Swan;Karla Fischer

  • Interlocking Interactions, the Diffusion of Innovations in Health Care

    Louise Fitzgerald;Ewan Ferlie;Martin Wood;Chris Hawkins

  • The Structure of Sexual Harassment: A Confirmatory Analysis across Cultures and Settings

    Michelle J. Gelfand;Louise F. Fitzgerald;Fritz Drasgow

  • Toward a career psychology of women: What do we know? What do we need to know?

    Louise F. Fitzgerald;John O. Crites

  • The (un)reasonableness of reporting: antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment.

    Mindy E. Bergman;Regina Day Langhout;Patrick A. Palmieri;Lilia M. Cortina

  • Sexual Harassment: A Research Analysis and Agenda for the 1990s

    Louise F. Fitzgerald;Sandra L. Shullman

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary P. Koss
Mary P. Koss University of Arizona
Lisa A. Goodman
Lisa A. Goodman Boston College
Fritz Drasgow
Fritz Drasgow University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Nancy E. Betz
Nancy E. Betz The Ohio State University
Lilia M. Cortina
Lilia M. Cortina University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michele J. Gelfand
Michele J. Gelfand Stanford University
Suzanne C. Swan
Suzanne C. Swan University of South Carolina
Charles L. Hulin
Charles L. Hulin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Glenn E. Good
Glenn E. Good University of Missouri
Ruth E. Fassinger
Ruth E. Fassinger University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology degree programs in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online learning options and career paths. Many students look for degrees that offer strong job prospects and return on investment. Programs featured in the most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in America highlight schools that pair academic excellence with competitive tuition and career readiness.

If you’re seeking region-specific opportunities, check out the best value psychology degrees in South Carolina or the best value psychology degrees in Tampa. These programs are recognized for blending affordability with strong graduate outcomes, making them attractive choices for local and online learners.

Social work is another rewarding field related to psychology. Prospective students interested in helping communities may want to review the best online bsw programs in America, which emphasize flexibility, student support, and real-world career skills.

Whether you pursue psychology or social work online, these pathways can lead to impactful careers in counseling, education, healthcare, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Louise F. Fitzgerald

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles