World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8677 4611 65 36167

Gail Hackett publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gail Hackett between 1977 and 2015, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gail Hackett published across 39 years, from 1977 to 2015, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 1977. 1 of the 79 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2015. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 1977. 1977: 6 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication
1977 2015

79 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gail Hackett: publications per year, 1977 to 2015
Year Publications
1977 6
1978 2
1979 2
1980 4
1981 5
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 3
1986 3
1987 5
1988 1
1989 3
1990 4
1991 1
1992 3
1993 3
1994 3
1995 3
1996 0
1997 3
1998 4
1999 1
2000 4
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 2
2005 0
2006 2
2007 1
2008 0
2009 2
2010 2
2011 0
2012 2
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
Total 79
Download as CSV

Gail Hackett publications per year - data summary

  • Gail Hackett, a Psychology scholar from Arizona State University, has 79 publications recorded across 39 years, from 1977 to 2015.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1977 and the most recent to 2015.
  • The most productive year is 1977, with 6 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1982, 1984, 1988, 1991 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 9 of the 39 years in the span carry no publications at all (1996, 2001, 2002, 2003 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 2.6 per year counting only the 30 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2011-2015) hold 3 publications, 4% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1977-1989: 38 publications (2.9 per year); 1990-2002: 29 publications (2.2 per year); 2003-2015: 12 publications (0.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Gail Hackett publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gail Hackett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 65 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 65
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Gail Hackett publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Gail Hackett, a Psychology scholar from Arizona State University, records 65 publications - the 3rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 3% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Gail Hackett, and about 97% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Gail Hackett ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Gail Hackett D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gail Hackett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Gail Hackett D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Gail Hackett, a Psychology scholar from Arizona State University, records 38 D-Index - the 24th percentile of the discipline.
  • 24% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Gail Hackett, and about 76% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Gail Hackett ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Gail Hackett is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. The research profile available provides foundational details about their academic position but does not include information on specific research topics, fields of study, or subfields.

There are no records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues associated with Gail Hackett in the provided data. Similarly, there is no listing of book publications or main topics of work documented for this scientist.

The absence of these details limits the capacity to outline the precise areas of research or scholarly contributions for this individual. Likewise, no awards or honors have been recorded.

No information indicates that Gail Hackett is deceased, so the profile is presented in the present tense.

Best Publications

  • Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance

    Robert William Lent;Steven D. Brown;Gail Hackett

  • Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis.

    Robert W. Lent;Steven D. Brown;Gail Hackett

  • A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women

    Gail Hackett;Nancy E Betz

  • The Relationship of Career-Related Self-Efficacy Expectations to Perceived Career Options in College Women and Men.

    Nancy E. Betz;Gail Hackett

  • The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors

    Nancy E Betz;Gail Hackett

  • An Exploration of the Mathematics Self-Efficacy/Mathematics Performance Correspondence

    Gail Hackett;Nancy E. Betz

  • Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future directions

    Robert W Lent;Gail Hackett

  • Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: a path analysis

    Gail Hackett

  • Gender, Ethnicity, and Social Cognitive Factors Predicting the Academic Achievement of Students in Engineering.

    Gail Hackett;Nancy E. Betz;J. Manuel Casas;Indra A. Rocha-Singh

  • Self-Efficacy and Career Choice and Development

    Gail Hackett;Nancy E. Betz

  • Applications of Self-Efficacy Theory to Understanding Career Choice Behavior

    Nancy E. Betz;Gail Hackett

  • Social Cognitive Theory and the Career Development of African American Women

    Gail Hackett;Angela M. Byars

  • Career Self-Efficacy Theory: Back to the Future

    Nancy E. Betz;Gail Hackett

  • A Social Cognitive View of School-to-Work Transition.

    Robert W. Lent;Gail Hackett;Steven D. Brown

  • Theoretical advances and current inquiry in career psychology.

    Gail Hackett;Robert William Lent

  • The effects of mathematics task performance on math self-efficacy and task interest☆

    Nancy K Campbell;Gail Hackett

  • A Causal Model of the Educational Plans and Career Expectations of Mexican American High School Girls.

    Ellen Hawley McWhirter;Gail Hackett;Deborah L. Bandalos

  • Applications of Self-Efficacy Theory to the Career Assessment of Women:

    Nancy E. Betz;Gail Hackett

  • Advances in vocational theory and research: A 20-year retrospective

    Gail Hackett;Robert W Lent;Jeffrey H Greenhaus

  • Barriers and supports for continuing in mathematics and science: Gender and educational level differences.

    Nadya A. Fouad;Gail Hackett;Philip L. Smith;Neeta Kantamneni

  • Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy E. Betz
Nancy E. Betz The Ohio State University
Robert W. Lent
Robert W. Lent University of Maryland, College Park
Steven D. Brown
Steven D. Brown Loyola University Chicago
Ellen Hawley McWhirter
Ellen Hawley McWhirter University of Oregon
Mary Anne Fitzpatrick
Mary Anne Fitzpatrick University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jeffrey H. Greenhaus
Jeffrey H. Greenhaus Drexel University
Nadya A. Fouad
Nadya A. Fouad University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open the door to a variety of rewarding career paths, including roles in counseling, research, and behavioral analysis. Many students pursue further credentials, such as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), to enhance their expertise and job prospects.

Requirements for becoming a BCBA differ depending on location. For example, research into how to become a bcba in Spokane highlights region-specific coursework and supervised experience. Similarly, the process outlined in St. Louis bcba education requirements emphasizes the importance of a graduate-level degree and passing the BCBA exam.

In other areas, such as St. Petersburg bcba requirements and Stockton bcba education requirements, candidates must also complete supervised fieldwork, specific coursework, and meet state licensing standards.

Overall, an online psychology degree can be tailored toward diverse careers in mental health, education, and therapy. With additional certifications, you can expand your professional opportunities and make a meaningful impact in various communities.

Best Scientists Citing Gail Hackett

Recently Published Articles