World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
36167
World Ranking
8677
National Ranking
4611

Gail Hackett publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gail Hackett sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 65 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gail Hackett D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gail Hackett sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gail Hackett is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. The research profile available provides foundational details about their academic position but does not include information on specific research topics, fields of study, or subfields.

There are no records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues associated with Gail Hackett in the provided data. Similarly, there is no listing of book publications or main topics of work documented for this scientist.

The absence of these details limits the capacity to outline the precise areas of research or scholarly contributions for this individual. Likewise, no awards or honors have been recorded.

No information indicates that Gail Hackett is deceased, so the profile is presented in the present tense.

Best Publications

  • Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance

    Robert William Lent;Steven D. Brown;Gail Hackett

  • Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis.

    Robert W. Lent;Steven D. Brown;Gail Hackett

  • A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women

    Gail Hackett;Nancy E Betz

  • The Relationship of Career-Related Self-Efficacy Expectations to Perceived Career Options in College Women and Men.

    Nancy E. Betz;Gail Hackett

  • The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors

    Nancy E Betz;Gail Hackett

  • An Exploration of the Mathematics Self-Efficacy/Mathematics Performance Correspondence

    Gail Hackett;Nancy E. Betz

  • Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future directions

    Robert W Lent;Gail Hackett

  • Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: a path analysis

    Gail Hackett

  • Gender, Ethnicity, and Social Cognitive Factors Predicting the Academic Achievement of Students in Engineering.

    Gail Hackett;Nancy E. Betz;J. Manuel Casas;Indra A. Rocha-Singh

  • Self-Efficacy and Career Choice and Development

    Gail Hackett;Nancy E. Betz

  • Applications of Self-Efficacy Theory to Understanding Career Choice Behavior

    Nancy E. Betz;Gail Hackett

  • Social Cognitive Theory and the Career Development of African American Women

    Gail Hackett;Angela M. Byars

  • Career Self-Efficacy Theory: Back to the Future

    Nancy E. Betz;Gail Hackett

  • A Social Cognitive View of School-to-Work Transition.

    Robert W. Lent;Gail Hackett;Steven D. Brown

  • Theoretical advances and current inquiry in career psychology.

    Gail Hackett;Robert William Lent

  • The effects of mathematics task performance on math self-efficacy and task interest☆

    Nancy K Campbell;Gail Hackett

  • A Causal Model of the Educational Plans and Career Expectations of Mexican American High School Girls.

    Ellen Hawley McWhirter;Gail Hackett;Deborah L. Bandalos

  • Applications of Self-Efficacy Theory to the Career Assessment of Women:

    Nancy E. Betz;Gail Hackett

  • Advances in vocational theory and research: A 20-year retrospective

    Gail Hackett;Robert W Lent;Jeffrey H Greenhaus

  • Barriers and supports for continuing in mathematics and science: Gender and educational level differences.

    Nadya A. Fouad;Gail Hackett;Philip L. Smith;Neeta Kantamneni

  • Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy E. Betz
Nancy E. Betz The Ohio State University
Robert W. Lent
Robert W. Lent University of Maryland, College Park
Steven D. Brown
Steven D. Brown Loyola University Chicago
Ellen Hawley McWhirter
Ellen Hawley McWhirter University of Oregon
Mary Anne Fitzpatrick
Mary Anne Fitzpatrick University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jeffrey H. Greenhaus
Jeffrey H. Greenhaus Drexel University
Nadya A. Fouad
Nadya A. Fouad University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open the door to a variety of rewarding career paths, including roles in counseling, research, and behavioral analysis. Many students pursue further credentials, such as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), to enhance their expertise and job prospects.

Requirements for becoming a BCBA differ depending on location. For example, research into how to become a bcba in Spokane highlights region-specific coursework and supervised experience. Similarly, the process outlined in St. Louis bcba education requirements emphasizes the importance of a graduate-level degree and passing the BCBA exam.

In other areas, such as St. Petersburg bcba requirements and Stockton bcba education requirements, candidates must also complete supervised fieldwork, specific coursework, and meet state licensing standards.

Overall, an online psychology degree can be tailored toward diverse careers in mental health, education, and therapy. With additional certifications, you can expand your professional opportunities and make a meaningful impact in various communities.

Best Scientists Citing Gail Hackett