World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
13944
World Ranking
3690
National Ranking
2072

Nadya A. Fouad publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadya A. Fouad sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 206 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nadya A. Fouad D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadya A. Fouad sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Nadya A. Fouad is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within the social sciences, with a strong focus on career development and diversity as well as related interdisciplinary topics.

The main fields of study represented in their work include Social Sciences, with particular attention to subfields such as Safety Research, Education, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, and General Health Professions.

The primary topics of Fouad's research encompass:

  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Higher Education and Employability
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

Their recent published papers include:

  • "Editor in Chief's Introduction to Essays on the Impact of COVID-19 on Work and Workers", 2020, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • "Why Aren't We There Yet? The Status of Research in Women's Career Development", 2023, The Counseling Psychologist

In addition to these, other notable publications connected to their research domain, although led by other authors, remain relevant in the context of career development and assessment:

  • "Family Influence on Academic and Life Satisfaction: A Social Cognitive Perspective", 2020, Journal of Career Development
  • "Careers and Career Development", 2021, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology
  • "Multicultural Vocational Research: Critique and Call to Action", 2022, Journal of Career Assessment

Frequent co-authors in Fouad's academic collaborations include:

  • Michael B. Kozlowski
  • Stephanie G. Burrows
  • Samantha S. Schams
  • Romila Singh
  • Kristin N. Weber

Their work is regularly published in venues such as:

  • Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Journal of Career Assessment
  • The Counseling Psychologist
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Nadya A. Fouad has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) since 1994.

Best Publications

  • Competency benchmarks: A model for understanding and measuring competence in professional psychology across training levels.

    Nadya A. Fouad;Catherine L. Grus;Robert L. Hatcher;Nadine J. Kaslow

  • A test of a social cognitive model for middle school students: Math and science.

    Nadya A. Fouad;Philip L. Smith

  • Asian Americans' career choices: A path model to examine factors influencing their career choices.

    Mei Tang;Nadya A. Fouad;Philip L. Smith

  • The Role of Family Context in a Social Cognitive Model for Career-Related Choice Behavior: A Math and Science Perspective

    Tamara R. Ferry;Nadya A. Fouad;Philip L. Smith

  • Cultural Context of Career Choice: Meta-Analysis of Race/Ethnicity Differences.

    Nadya A. Fouad;Angela M. Byars-Winston

  • Competency Assessment Toolkit for Professional Psychology

    Nadine J. Kaslow;Catherine L. Grus;Linda F. Campbell;Nadya A. Fouad

  • Career Theory and Practice: Learning Through Case Studies

    Jane Laurel Swanson;Nadya A. Fouad

  • Work and Vocational Psychology: Theory, Research, and Applications

    Nadya A Fouad

  • Handbook for Social Justice in Counseling Psychology: Leadership, Vision, and Action

    Nadya Fouad;Lawrence H. Gerstein

  • Social justice and counseling psychology in context.

    Nadya A. Fouad;Lawrence H. Gerstein;Rebecca L. Toporek

  • Role of race and social class in development: Implications for counseling psychology.

    Nadya A. Fouad;Michael T. Brown

  • Subject-matter specificity of self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, interests, and goals: Implications for the social–cognitive model.

    Philip L. Smith;Nadya A. Fouad

  • Asian American career development: A qualitative analysis

    Nadya A. Fouad;Neeta Kantamneni;Melissa K. Smothers;Yung-Lung Chen

  • Barriers and supports for continuing in mathematics and science: Gender and educational level differences.

    Nadya A. Fouad;Gail Hackett;Philip L. Smith;Neeta Kantamneni

  • Reliability and Validity Evidence for the Middle School Self-Efficacy Scale.

    Nadya A. Fouad;Philip L. Smith;Larry Enochs

  • Comparison of women engineers who persist in or depart from engineering

    Nadya A. Fouad;Romila Singh;Kevin Cappaert;Wen-hsin Chang

  • The Effectiveness of a Career Decision-Making Course

    Nadya Fouad;Elizabeth W. Cotter;Neeta Kantamneni

  • SCCT and underrepresented populations in STEM fields: Moving the needle.

    Nadya A. Fouad;Mercedes C. Santana

  • Cross‐Cultural Vocational Assessment

    Nadya A. Fouad

  • Math and Science Social Cognitive Variables in College Students: Contributions of Contextual Factors in Predicting Goals

    Angela M. Byars-Winston;Nadya A. Fouad

Frequent Co-Authors

Angela Byars-Winston
Angela Byars-Winston University of Wisconsin–Madison
Frederick T. L. Leong
Frederick T. L. Leong Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Mary Anne Fitzpatrick
Mary Anne Fitzpatrick University of Wisconsin–Madison
David L. Blustein
David L. Blustein Boston College
Janet Shibley Hyde
Janet Shibley Hyde University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robert T. Carter
Robert T. Carter Columbia University
Robert W. Lent
Robert W. Lent University of Maryland, College Park
Rodney K. Goodyear
Rodney K. Goodyear University of Redlands
James Rounds
James Rounds University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Susan H. McDaniel
Susan H. McDaniel University of Rochester Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of online study options and diverse career pathways. Many students pursue specializations such as counseling, clinical psychology, or behavior analysis. One popular route is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which requires specific education and certification steps depending on your location.

For example, if you want to understand the Las Vegas bcba education requirements, you'll need a master's degree in an approved field and supervised experience. If you plan to work in Kentucky, check out the process for how to become a bcba in Lexington, which covers state-specific regulations and credentials.

Similarly, students interested in Nebraska should review how to become a bcba in Lincoln for details on educational prerequisites and supervised training. In California, the bcba certification requirements in Long Beach shed light on local licensing and exam details.

With flexible online degrees and updated certification pathways, students can tailor their study to their preferred location and career goals. It's essential to research local requirements to ensure you meet all professional standards in your desired field.

Best Scientists Citing Nadya A. Fouad

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles