World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
14979
World Ranking
4345
National Ranking
2421

James Rounds publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Rounds sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 142 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

James Rounds D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Rounds sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

James Rounds is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of social sciences and psychology, with a substantive focus on areas such as safety research, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, education, and general health professions.

Their scholarly contributions cover a broad range of topics including career development and diversity, higher education and employability, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, employment and welfare studies, labor market dynamics and wage inequality, psychological and educational research studies, and personality traits and psychology.

Rounds has published extensively in several academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Journal of Career Assessment
  • Journal of Business and Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Journal of Research in Personality

Their recent papers demonstrate ongoing engagement with vocational interests, job satisfaction, and career outcomes. Notable recent works include:

  • Interest fit and job satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020, Journal of Vocational Behavior)
  • How accurate are interest inventories? A quantitative review of career choice hit rates (2020, Psychological Bulletin)
  • The effects of vocational interests on motivation, satisfaction, and academic performance: Test of a mediated model (2021, Journal of Vocational Behavior)
  • Adolescent vocational interests predict early career success: Two 12-year longitudinal studies (2021, Applied Psychology)
  • Personality Changes Predict Early Career Outcomes: Discovery and Replication in 12-Year Longitudinal Studies (2020, Psychological Science)

Collaborative work features frequent coauthors such as Kevin A. Hoff, Alexis Hanna, Sif Einarsdóttir, Chu Chu, and Frederick L. Oswald, indicating a networked research approach and interdisciplinary connections.

Best Publications

  • Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests.

    Rong Su;James Rounds;Patrick Ian Armstrong

  • A meta-analysis of massage therapy research.

    Christopher A. Moyer;James Rounds;James W. Hannum

  • HIGHER‐ORDER DIMENSIONS OF THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS AND THE BIG SIX VOCATIONAL INTEREST TYPES

    Michael K. Mount;Murray R. Barrick;Steve M. Scullen;James Rounds

  • The stability of vocational interests from early adolescence to middle adulthood: a quantitative review of longitudinal studies.

    K. S. Douglas Low;Mijung Yoon;Brent W. Roberts;James Rounds

  • Vocational Interests and Performance: A Quantitative Summary of Over 60 Years of Research

    Christopher D. Nye;Rong Su;James Rounds;Fritz Drasgow

  • Evaluating Holland's and Gati's Vocational-Interest Models: A Structural Meta-Analysis

    Terence J. Tracey;James B. Rounds

  • All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain gender disparities across STEM fields.

    Rong Su;James Rounds

  • Cross-cultural structural equivalence of RIASEC models and measures

    James Rounds;Terence J. Tracey

  • Measurement of person-environment fit and prediction of satisfaction in the theory of work adjustment☆

    James B. Rounds;René V. Dawis;Lloyd H. Lofquist

  • Measurement and Dimensionality of Mathematics Anxiety.

    James B. Rounds;Darwin D. Hendel

  • Psychosocial factors and the development of breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

    Molly C. McKenna;Michael A. Zevon;Barbara Corn;James Rounds

  • The Spherical Representation of Vocational Interests

    Terence J.G. Tracey;James Rounds

  • Prediger's dimensional representation of Holland's RIASEC circumplex.

    James Rounds;Terence J. Tracey

  • The Nature and Power of Interests

    James Rounds;Rong Su

  • Stability and change in work values: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies

    Jing Jin;James Rounds

  • Universality of Vocational Interest Structure among Racial and Ethnic Minorities.

    Susan X. Day;James Rounds

  • From trait-and-factor to person-environment fit counseling: Theory and process.

    James B. Rounds;Terence J. Tracey

  • Holland's RIASEC Model as an Integrative Framework for Individual Differences

    Patrick Ian Armstrong;Susan X. Day;Jason P. McVay;James Rounds

  • Vocational interests: Evaluating structural hypotheses.

    James Rounds

  • Methods for Evaluating Vocational Interest Structural Hypotheses.

    James Rounds;Terence J Tracey;Lawrence Hubert

Frequent Co-Authors

Terence J. G. Tracey
Terence J. G. Tracey Arizona State University
Lawrence Hubert
Lawrence Hubert University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Fritz Drasgow
Fritz Drasgow University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Daniel A. Briley
Daniel A. Briley University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Louis Tay
Louis Tay Purdue University West Lafayette
Beryl Hesketh
Beryl Hesketh Western Sydney University
Stephen Stark
Stephen Stark University of South Florida
Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko
Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko Nanyang Technological University
Daniel A. Newman
Daniel A. Newman University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Brent W. Roberts
Brent W. Roberts University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of psychology offers a variety of accredited online degrees and specialized career pathways that cater to diverse interests and professional goals. Those interested in the intersection of psychology and law can explore forensic psychology phd programs online, preparing graduates for roles in criminal justice, law enforcement, and consultancy.

For those passionate about working with children and educational systems, there are nasp accredited online school psychology programs that align with national standards and offer flexible learning options for aspiring school psychologists.

If you are looking to gain advanced training quickly, consider the best 1 year master's in psychology online programs, which are designed to help you enter the workforce or pursue further specialization in less time.

Another growing area is applied behavior analysis. Pursuing a masters degree in applied behavior analysis online can prepare you to help individuals with behavioral challenges in settings such as schools, healthcare, and private practice.

These online programs offer flexibility, career advancement, and the chance to make a meaningful impact in various professional settings.

Best Scientists Citing James Rounds

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles