D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Psychology D-index 41 Citations 11,749 147 World Ranking 5363 National Ranking 3058

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social psychology
  • Statistics
  • Social science

His primary scientific interests are in Subjective well-being, Well-being, Social psychology, Happiness and Life satisfaction. His research integrates issues of Developmental psychology, Positive economics and Public economics in his study of Subjective well-being. He combines subjects such as Native english and Conceptual framework with his study of Social psychology.

His Happiness study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Social support and Applied psychology. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Flourishing, Basic needs and Meaning. He has researched Test validity in several fields, including Quality and Rating scale.

His most cited work include:

  • Needs and subjective well-being around the world. (582 citations)
  • Theory and Validity of Life Satisfaction Scales (568 citations)
  • The religion paradox: if religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out? (324 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Social psychology, Subjective well-being, Life satisfaction, Happiness and Well-being. His studies deal with areas such as Developmental psychology and Scale as well as Social psychology. His Subjective well-being research integrates issues from Applied psychology and Positive psychology.

His Life satisfaction study incorporates themes from Optimism, Job satisfaction, Demographic economics and Mood. His work deals with themes such as Social support, Public economics and Unemployment, which intersect with Happiness. His Well-being research incorporates Empirical research, Flourishing and Test validity.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Social psychology (38.16%)
  • Subjective well-being (23.03%)
  • Life satisfaction (19.08%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Social psychology (38.16%)
  • Personality (13.82%)
  • Applied psychology (12.50%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Louis Tay focuses on Social psychology, Personality, Applied psychology, Data science and Subjective well-being. His research in Social psychology intersects with topics in Scholarship and Self-determination theory. His Applied psychology study deals with Intervention research intersecting with Positive psychology.

Context, Situational ethics and Moderated mediation is closely connected to Prosocial behavior in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Subjective well-being. His Meaning research incorporates elements of Life satisfaction and Happiness. Louis Tay has included themes like Flourishing and Data collection in his Happiness study.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Positive Emotions at Work (23 citations)
  • From Data to Causes I: Building A General Cross-Lagged Panel Model (GCLM) (22 citations)
  • Current recommendations on the selection of measures for well-being (14 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Statistics
  • Social psychology
  • Social science

His primary areas of investigation include Life satisfaction, Panel data, Social psychology, Positive psychology and Optimism. His study in Life satisfaction is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Social support, Development economics and Happiness. His Happiness research focuses on Meaning and how it connects with Subjective well-being.

The various areas that Louis Tay examines in his Subjective well-being study include Contrast and Psychological resilience. His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Scholarship and Social psychology. His Optimism research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Flourishing, Data collection and Selection.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Needs and subjective well-being around the world.

Louis Tay;Ed Diener.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2011)

1431 Citations

Theory and Validity of Life Satisfaction Scales

Ed Diener;Ed Diener;Ronald Inglehart;Louis Tay.
(2013)

1142 Citations

The religion paradox: if religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out?

Ed Diener;Louis Tay;David G. Myers.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2011)

725 Citations

Leisure and Subjective Well-Being: A Model of Psychological Mechanisms as Mediating Factors

David B. Newman;Louis Tay;Ed Diener.
Journal of Happiness Studies (2014)

661 Citations

Gender differences in narcissism: A meta-analytic review.

Emily Grijalva;Daniel A. Newman;Louis Tay;M. Brent Donnellan.
Psychological Bulletin (2015)

562 Citations

Advances in subjective well-being research

Ed Diener;Shigehiro Oishi;Louis Tay.
Nature Human Behaviour (2018)

555 Citations

Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being

Ed Diener;Samantha J. Heintzelman;Kostadin Kushlev;Louis Tay.
Canadian Psychology (2017)

528 Citations

Rising income and the subjective well-being of nations

Ed Diener;Louis Tay;Shigehiro Oishi.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2013)

511 Citations

The objective benefits of subjective well-being

Jan-Emmanuel De Neve;Ed Diener;Louis Tay;Cody Xuereb.
Research Papers in Economics (2013)

407 Citations

The Development and Validation of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT)

Rong Su;Louis Tay;Ed Diener.
Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being (2014)

366 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Louis Tay

Ed Diener

Ed Diener

University of Virginia

Publications: 41

Constantine Sedikides

Constantine Sedikides

University of Southampton

Publications: 17

Ruut Veenhoven

Ruut Veenhoven

Erasmus University Rotterdam

Publications: 16

Fritz Drasgow

Fritz Drasgow

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Publications: 16

Shigehiro Oishi

Shigehiro Oishi

University of Virginia

Publications: 16

Tyler J. VanderWeele

Tyler J. VanderWeele

Harvard University

Publications: 13

Daryl R. Van Tongeren

Daryl R. Van Tongeren

Hope College

Publications: 12

Joshua N. Hook

Joshua N. Hook

University of North Texas

Publications: 11

M. Joseph Sirgy

M. Joseph Sirgy

Virginia Tech

Publications: 11

Espen Røysamb

Espen Røysamb

University of Oslo

Publications: 11

Filip Lievens

Filip Lievens

Singapore Management University

Publications: 10

Richard E. Lucas

Richard E. Lucas

Michigan State University

Publications: 10

Ralf Schwarzer

Ralf Schwarzer

Freie Universität Berlin

Publications: 10

Don E. Davis

Don E. Davis

Georgia State University

Publications: 10

John F. Rauthmann

John F. Rauthmann

Bielefeld University

Publications: 9

Todd B. Kashdan

Todd B. Kashdan

George Mason University

Publications: 9

Trending Scientists

Maxim Likhachev

Maxim Likhachev

Carnegie Mellon University

Konstantinos Psounis

Konstantinos Psounis

University of Southern California

Jeff Clune

Jeff Clune

OpenAI

Otmar Hilliges

Otmar Hilliges

ETH Zurich

George I. N. Rozvany

George I. N. Rozvany

Budapest University of Technology and Economics

Carlos G. Levi

Carlos G. Levi

University of California, Santa Barbara

Yongyong Shi

Yongyong Shi

Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Jeffrey R. Johnson

Jeffrey R. Johnson

University of California, San Francisco

Maria Navajas

Maria Navajas

Montpellier SupAgro

Sharon A. Robinson

Sharon A. Robinson

University of Wollongong

Yan Zhao

Yan Zhao

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Gilles Pinay

Gilles Pinay

Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

Charles D. Fraser

Charles D. Fraser

The University of Texas at Austin

Suzan Lewis

Suzan Lewis

Middlesex University

Dana L. Zeidler

Dana L. Zeidler

University of South Florida

Louis Henkin

Louis Henkin

Columbia University

Something went wrong. Please try again later.