World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
15216
World Ranking
7699
National Ranking
4121

James M. LeBreton publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. LeBreton sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

James M. LeBreton D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. LeBreton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

James M. LeBreton is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields and topics primarily within psychology and social sciences, with a particular focus on clinical psychology and organizational behavior.

LeBreton's recent scholarly contributions include publications in various peer-reviewed journals. Notable papers are:

  • "Bias, Fairness, and Validity in Graduate-School Admissions: A Psychometric Perspective" (2022), published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "The association between mentalizing and psychopathology: A meta-analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes task across psychiatric disorders." (2022), featured in Clinical Psychology Science and Practice
  • "Data Aggregation in Multilevel Research: Best Practice Recommendations and Tools for Moving Forward" (2022), appearing in Journal of Business and Psychology
  • "Mentalizing in and out of awareness: A meta-analytic review of implicit and explicit mentalizing" (2024), published in Clinical Psychology Review
  • "Multilevel empirical research: A call for more mixed-methods approaches" (2024), in European Management Journal

Their frequent co-authors include Kenneth N. Levy, Benjamin N. Johnson, Anna Maria Zabinski, Amanda Moeller, and Sydney L. Reichin.

LeBreton's publications appear most often in venues such as:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • European Management Journal
  • Journal of Business and Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology Science and Practice

The primary fields of study for LeBreton's research are:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Their work further explores several subfields, including:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Key topics covered in LeBreton's research include:

  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Medical Education and Admissions
  • Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Best Publications

  • Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement

    James M. LeBreton;Jenell L. Senter

  • History and Use of Relative Importance Indices in Organizational Research

    Jeff W. Johnson;James M. Lebreton

  • Relative Importance Analysis: A Useful Supplement to Regression Analysis

    Scott Tonidandel;James Marshall Lebreton

  • Destructive Leadership A Theoretical Review, Integration, and Future Research Agenda

    Dina V. Krasikova;Stephen G. Green;James M. LeBreton

  • The dark side of personality at work

    Seth M. Spain;Peter D. Harms;James M. Lebreton

  • RWA Web: A Free, Comprehensive, Web-Based, and User-Friendly Tool for Relative Weight Analyses

    Scott Tonidandel;James M. LeBreton

  • The Restriction of Variance Hypothesis and Interrater Reliability and Agreement: Are Ratings from Multiple Sources Really Dissimilar?

    James M. Lebreton;Jennifer R. D. Burgess;Robert B. Kaiser;E. Kate Atchley

  • A comparative test of work-family conflict models and critical examination of work-family linkages.

    Jesse S. Michel;Jacqueline K. Mitchelson;Lindsey M. Kotrba;James M. LeBreton

  • RECONSIDERING THE DISPOSITIONAL BASIS OF COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOR: THE ROLE OF ABERRANT PERSONALITY

    Jane Wu;James M. Lebreton

  • Determining the statistical significance of relative weights.

    Scott Tonidandel;James M. LeBreton;Jeff W. Johnson

  • Risk factors for sexual aggression in young men: an expansion of the confluence model

    Antonia Abbey;Angela J. Jacques-Tiura;James M. LeBreton

  • The Relative Importance of Employee Engagement, Other Job Attitudes, and Trait Affect as Predictors of Job Performance†

    Reeshad S. Dalal;Michael Baysinger;Bradley J. Brummel;James M. LeBreton

  • The Dark Side of Personality and Extreme Leader Behavior

    Robert B. Kaiser;James M. LeBreton;Joyce Hogan

  • A multidimensional approach for evaluating variables in organizational research and practice

    James M. LeBRETON;Michael B. Hargis;Brian Griepentrog;Frederick L. Oswald

  • A Conditional Reasoning Measure for Aggression

    Lawrence R. James;Lawrence R. James;Michael D. McIntyre;Charles A. Glisson;Phillip D. Green

  • Multivariate relative importance: extending relative weight analysis to multivariate criterion spaces.

    James Marshall Lebreton;Scott Tonidandel

  • Just the Two of Us: Misalignment of Theory and Methods in Examining Dyadic Phenomena

    Dina V. Krasikova;James Marshall Lebreton

  • A brief form of the child abuse potential inventory: development and validation.

    Steven J. Ondersma;Mark J. Chaffin;Sharon M. Mullins;James M. LeBreton

  • A Monte Carlo Comparison of Relative Importance Methodologies

    James M. Lebreton;Robert E. Ployhart;Robert T. Ladd

  • The Dark Triad and Workplace Behavior

    James M. LeBreton;Levi K. Shiverdecker;Elizabeth M. Grimaldi

  • Measurement issues associated with conditional reasoning tests: indirect measurement and test faking.

    James M. LeBreton;Cheryl D. Barksdale;Jennifer Robin;Lawrence R. James

Frequent Co-Authors

Lawrence R. James
Lawrence R. James Georgia Institute of Technology
Louis Tay
Louis Tay Purdue University West Lafayette
David L. Streiner
David L. Streiner University of Toronto
Frederick P. Morgeson
Frederick P. Morgeson Michigan State University
Reeshad S. Dalal
Reeshad S. Dalal George Mason University
Boris B. Baltes
Boris B. Baltes Wayne State University
Terence R. Mitchell
Terence R. Mitchell University of Washington
Peter D. Harms
Peter D. Harms University of Alabama
Antonia Abbey
Antonia Abbey Wayne State University
Jose M. Cortina
Jose M. Cortina Virginia Commonwealth University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to a wide range of online degree programs and professional pathways. Many students pursue degrees in counseling, social work, or specialized areas like marriage and family therapy (MFT). These pathways can often be started online, but always require careful attention to state-specific licensing and education rules.

For instance, becoming an MFT involves meeting New Orleans mft education requirements, which differ from the mft requirements in New York City and the Newark mft certification requirements. Likewise, if you’re aiming to work as a therapist in Virginia, you’ll need to follow the specific steps on how to become an mft in Norfolk.

Online psychology degrees can provide foundational knowledge, but graduates should always check the latest local guidelines before selecting a program. Understanding educational and licensing requirements in your chosen state is crucial for a smooth career journey.

Best Scientists Citing James M. LeBreton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles