What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Law
- Management
- Social science
Social psychology, Improvisation, Creativity, Public relations and Process are his primary areas of study.
His studies link Humility with Social psychology.
The Improvisation study combines topics in areas such as Action, Management, Jazz and Process management.
His studies deal with areas such as Phenomenon, Information technology and Passion as well as Public relations.
His Process research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Exploratory learning, Knowledge management, Organizational learning, Organizational context and Epistemology.
His Epistemology research includes elements of Relational view and Role theory.
His most cited work include:
- Workplace spirituality and organizational commitment: an empirical study (327 citations)
- Organizational improvisation: what, when, how, and why (324 citations)
- Authentic leadership promoting employees' psychological capital and creativity (311 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of study are Improvisation, Social psychology, Epistemology, Public relations and Knowledge management.
His Improvisation study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Action, Management, Jazz, Bricolage and Process management.
His work on Happiness and Creativity as part of general Social psychology research is frequently linked to Perspective, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His Epistemology study frequently links to adjacent areas such as Process.
His Process study frequently intersects with other fields, such as Context.
He most often published in these fields:
- Improvisation (21.82%)
- Social psychology (20.78%)
- Epistemology (15.32%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Social psychology (20.78%)
- Public relations (13.77%)
- Epistemology (15.32%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Miguel Pina e Cunha mainly focuses on Social psychology, Public relations, Epistemology, Improvisation and Resilience.
His Social psychology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Capital, Empirical research and Humility.
His study in Public relations is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Quality and Business studies.
Miguel Pina e Cunha is interested in Organization studies, which is a field of Epistemology.
His Improvisation research focuses on Adaptation and how it relates to Diversity and Personality.
His work in Environmental ethics tackles topics such as Process which are related to areas like Context.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Leader humility and team performance: exploring the mediating mechanisms of team PsyCap and task allocation effectiveness (52 citations)
- Paradox theory and the paradox of success (39 citations)
- The Perceived Impact of Leaders’ Humility on Team Effectiveness: an Empirical Study (32 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Law
- Management
- Social science
Miguel Pina e Cunha mainly investigates Public relations, Social psychology, Organizational theory, Improvisation and Organization studies.
Miguel Pina e Cunha combines subjects such as Vignette, Performance management, Meritocracy and Social theory with his study of Public relations.
His Social psychology research includes themes of Humility, Capital, Empirical research and Team effectiveness.
His study on Organizational theory also encompasses disciplines like
- Organizational culture, which have a strong connection to Knowledge management and Organizational unit,
- Learning organization which intersects with area such as Blueprint, Epistemology, Ambidexterity and Originality.
His research in Improvisation intersects with topics in Consistency, Psychological resilience, Process management and Action.
In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Organization studies, Management, Contingency, Institutionalisation and Area studies is strongly linked to Positive economics.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
