World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Business and Management
Portugal
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 67 359 336 3 3 487 20222

Miguel Pina e Cunha publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Miguel Pina e Cunha between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Miguel Pina e Cunha published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 19.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2021. 64 of the 649 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2021. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 23 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 25 publications 2009: 29 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 31 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 36 publications 2021: 57 publications 2022: 31 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 34 publications
1992 2025

649 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Miguel Pina e Cunha: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 1
1994 2
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 8
2000 12
2001 8
2002 23
2003 25
2004 16
2005 17
2006 13
2007 20
2008 25
2009 29
2010 14
2011 14
2012 26
2013 28
2014 31
2015 24
2016 19
2017 28
2018 30
2019 29
2020 36
2021 57
2022 31
2023 15
2024 30
2025 34
Total 649
Download as CSV

Miguel Pina e Cunha publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miguel Pina e Cunha sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 436+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 487 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100 487
Download as CSV

Miguel Pina e Cunha D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miguel Pina e Cunha sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18 67
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Business and Management in Portugal Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Business and Management in Portugal Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Business and Management in Portugal Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Business and Management in Portugal Leader Award

Overview

Miguel Pina e Cunha is affiliated with Universidade Nova de Lisboa in Portugal. Their research primarily spans fields within Business, Management and Accounting as well as Social Sciences, with notable contributions in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, and Management of Technology and Innovation.

The main topics of their work include Management and Organizational Studies, Innovation and Knowledge Management, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Management Theory and Practice, Global and Cross-Cultural Management, Complex Systems and Decision Making, and Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Academy of Management Learning and Education
  • Organizações & Sociedade
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Human Performance
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Miguel Pina e Cunha's recent papers cover various themes related to resilience, creativity, and organizational paradoxes. Some of these papers are:

  • "Improvising resilience: The unfolding of resilient leadership in COVID-19 times" (2021) published in the International Journal of Hospitality Management
  • "Everyday Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review" (2020) published in The Journal of Creative Behavior
  • "Resilient Leadership as Paradox Work: Notes from COVID-19" (2020) published in Management and Organization Review
  • "Paradox, Dialectics or Trade-Offs? A Double Loop Model of Paradox" (2022) published in Journal of Management Studies
  • "Risks and critical success factors in the internationalization of born global startups of industry 4.0: A social, environmental, economic, and institutional analysis" (2021) published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Collaborations have been an aspect of their scholarly activity, with frequent co-authors including Stewart Clegg, Arménio Rego, Ace Volkmann Simpson, Marco Berti, and Medhanie Gaim.

In terms of book publications, Miguel Pina e Cunha has contributed through multiple titles, some of which are associated with well-known academic publishers. These include:

  • Edward Elgar Publishing - titles such as "Elgar Introduction to Organizational Paradox Theory" (2021), "Overview of the Elgar Introduction to Organizational Improvisation Theory" (2022), and "Final reflections: patterns, principles and practices" (2022)
  • Emerald Publishing Limited - "Organizational Hybridity: Perspectives, Processes, Promises" (2020) and "Interdisciplinary Dialogues on Organizational Paradox: Investigating Social Structures and Human Expression, Part B" (2021)
  • Cambridge University Press - "Organizational Paradox" (2022)

Their body of work reflects a focus on exploring complex organizational phenomena such as paradox theory, resilience in leadership, and interdisciplinary approaches to understanding organizational hybridity and creativity.

Best Publications

  • Manual de comportamento organizacional e gestão

    Miguel Pina e Cunha;Arménio Rego;Rita Cunha;Carlos Cabral-Cardoso

  • Authentic leadership promoting employees' psychological capital and creativity

    Arménio Rego;Filipa Sousa;Carla Susana Marques;Miguel Pina e Cunha

  • Workplace spirituality and organizational commitment: an empirical study

    Arménio Rego;Miguel Pina e Cunha

  • Organizational improvisation: what, when, how, and why

    Miguel Pina e Cunha;João Vieira Da Cunha;Ken N. Kamoche

  • Management Paradoxes: A Relational View

    Stewart R. Clegg;João Vieira da Cunha;Miguel Pina e Cunha

  • Time and Organizational Improvisation

    Mary Crossan;Miguel Pina E Cunha;Dusya Vera;João Cunha

  • Minimal Structures: From Jazz Improvisation to Product Innovation:

    Ken Kamoche;Miguel Pina e Cunha

  • Perceptions of Organizational Virtuousness and Happiness as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors.

    Arménio Rego;Neuza Ribeiro;Miguel Pina Cunha

  • Manual de gestão de pessoas e do capital humano

    Arménio Rego;Miguel Pina Cunha;Jorge F. S. Gomes;Rita Campos Cunha

  • Hope and positive affect mediating the authentic leadership and creativity relationship

    Arménio Rego;Arménio Rego;Filipa Sousa;Carla Marques;Miguel Pina e Cunha

  • Towards a Theory of Organizational Improvisation: Looking Beyond the Jazz Metaphor

    Ken Kamoche;Miguel Pina e Cunha;João Vieira da Cunha

  • Indústrias criativas: definição, limites e possibilidades

    Pedro F. Bendassolli;Thomaz Wood Jr.;Charles Kirschbaum;Miguel Pina e Cunha

  • Wild cards, weak signals and organisational improvisation

    Sandro Mendonça;Miguel Pina e Cunha;Jari Kaivo-oja;Frank Ruff

  • Authentizotic climates and employee happiness: Pathways to individual performance?

    Arménio Rego;Miguel Pina e Cunha

  • Leader Self-Reported Emotional Intelligence and Perceived Employee Creativity: An Exploratory Study

    Arménio Rego;Filipa Sousa;Miguel Pina e Cunha;Anabela Correia

  • How happiness mediates the organizational virtuousness and affective commitment relationship

    Arménio Rego;Neuza Ribeiro;Miguel Pina e Cunha;Jorge Correia Jesuino

  • Paradox theory and the paradox of success

    Miguel Pina e Cunha;Linda L Putnam

  • Product Innovation in Resource-Poor Environments: Three Research Streams†

    Miguel Pina e Cunha;Arménio Rego;Arménio Rego;Pedro Oliveira;Paulo Rosado

  • Are authentic leaders associated with more virtuous, committed and potent teams? ☆ ☆☆

    Arménio Rego;Andreia Vitória;Ana Magalhães;Neuza Ribeiro

  • Leader humility and team performance: exploring the mediating mechanisms of team PsyCap and task allocation effectiveness

    Arménio Rego;Bradley Owens;Kai Chi Yam;Dustin Bluhm

  • Improving knowledge management processes: a hybrid positive approach

    Isabel Pinho;Arménio Rego;Miguel Pina e Cunha

Frequent Co-Authors

Arménio Rego
Arménio Rego Catholic University of Portugal
Stewart Clegg
Stewart Clegg University of Sydney
Carla Susana Marques
Carla Susana Marques University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro
Emanuel Gomes
Emanuel Gomes Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Anne S. Miner
Anne S. Miner University of Wisconsin–Madison
Mary M. Crossan
Mary M. Crossan University of Western Ontario
Haridimos Tsoukas
Haridimos Tsoukas University of Cyprus
Wendy K. Smith
Wendy K. Smith University of Delaware
Eva S. Schernhammer
Eva S. Schernhammer Harvard Medical School
Robert Chia
Robert Chia University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Business and Management studies opens a variety of online degree options, each leading to distinctive career paths. If you're interested in numbers and financial decision-making, pursuing an accounting degree online can prepare you for vital roles in finance across diverse industries.

For those looking toward innovation and emerging technologies, an online artificial intelligence degree develops critical skills required for success in tech-focused business environments. This specialization is particularly valuable as AI transforms global commerce and management processes.

Students interested in the built environment or large-scale project coordination might pursue a degree in construction management. This pathway provides expertise needed for leadership roles in construction, infrastructure, and real estate sectors.

If your goal is to accelerate to upper management, consider enrolling in one of the best online executive mba programs. These programs are designed for professionals seeking to advance their leadership, strategic decision-making, and global business acumen.

Best Scientists Citing Miguel Pina e Cunha

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles