A scientist’s position in the ranking is determined based on their D-index (Discipline H-index), a metric that specifically accounts for the number of papers and corresponding citation metrics within the examined discipline of Business and Management. This discipline-centric approach provides precision and relevance, reflecting a researcher’s impact within their specialized field rather than their general scientific output.
Scope of Research and Selection Criteria
The ranking was constructed after examining a total of 279,971 scientist profiles drawn from diverse bibliometric data repositories encompassing all scientific disciplines. Within this extensive dataset, 22 scientists specifically active in Business and Management were identified and evaluated.
To qualify for inclusion in the ranking, a candidate’s D-index had to meet a minimum threshold of 30, coupled with the requirement that the majority of their tier publications reside within the Business and Management domain. In addition, consideration was given to scientists’ awards and notable achievements within the field, reflecting their recognized contributions beyond citation metrics.
The D-index threshold for inclusion is not static; it is adjusted in increments of 10 according to the estimated total number of scholars within each discipline, ensuring that the top 1% of leading scholars are captured in every ranking iteration. Furthermore, to maintain both specificity and accuracy, a proximity criterion is applied where the difference between a scientist’s general H-index and their D-index does not exceed 30%, safeguarding against overgeneralization of impact across disciplines.
Verification Practices and Ranking Methodology
Recognizing that raw bibliometric data alone cannot serve as an absolute measure of scholarly output or excellence, the Research.com team employed rigorous additional verification practices. Each scientist profile included in the ranking was manually reviewed and cross-correlated against publications from a wide range of trustworthy and reputable sources to confirm accuracy and validity.
While the number of papers published in prominent journals and conference proceedings does not directly influence a scientist’s position within the ranking, it remains a valuable secondary signal of their contribution to the field. This nuanced understanding highlights the complexity of research evaluation beyond simple metrics.
The ranking positions are firmly established using each researcher's D-index, derived from the verified bibliometric data gathered from OpenAlex, CrossRef, and supplementary reliable databases. These data sources are well regarded within the scholarly community for their breadth and transparency.
For a detailed explanation of the methodology and verification protocols employed, we encourage readers to consult our methodology page.
Research.com Agenda and Mission
At Research.com, our mission is to inspire and empower researchers, academic institutions, companies, and policymakers worldwide to explore the trajectories of leading experts in their fields. By providing a transparent and rigorously compiled ranking system, we offer the global scientific community a reliable means to identify who the top researchers are within specific areas of study, across countries, or within individual research organizations.
Through this initiative, we aim to facilitate collaboration, recognition, and informed decision-making that supports the advancement of science and innovation worldwide. The careful and meticulous work invested in creating this ranking reflects our commitment to providing credible, meaningful insights that honor scholarly excellence.
