World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5077 2786 111 34649

Lawrence R. James publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lawrence R. James between 1972 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lawrence R. James published across 51 years, from 1972 to 2022, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2012. 2 of the 118 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2012. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 4 publications 1974: 6 publications 1975: 6 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 5 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 6 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication
1972 2022

118 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lawrence R. James: publications per year, 1972 to 2022
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 4
1974 6
1975 6
1976 1
1977 5
1978 5
1979 4
1980 3
1981 3
1982 3
1983 1
1984 6
1985 0
1986 2
1987 0
1988 4
1989 6
1990 0
1991 2
1992 1
1993 3
1994 3
1995 2
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 2
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 3
2007 6
2008 3
2009 0
2010 1
2011 4
2012 7
2013 2
2014 4
2015 2
2016 0
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
2022 1
Total 118
Download as CSV

Lawrence R. James publications per year - data summary

  • Lawrence R. James, a Psychology scholar from Georgia Institute of Technology, has 118 publications recorded across 51 years, from 1972 to 2022.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1972 and the most recent to 2022.
  • The most productive year is 2012, with 7 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1972, 1976, 1983, 1992 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 10 of the 51 years in the span carry no publications at all (1985, 1987, 1990, 1996 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 2.9 per year counting only the 41 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2018-2022) hold 2 publications, 2% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1972-1988: 54 publications (3.2 per year); 1989-2005: 29 publications (1.7 per year); 2006-2022: 35 publications (2.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Lawrence R. James publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence R. James sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 111 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 111
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lawrence R. James publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Lawrence R. James, a Psychology scholar from Georgia Institute of Technology, records 111 publications - the 27th percentile of the discipline.
  • 27% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Lawrence R. James, and about 73% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Lawrence R. James ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Lawrence R. James D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence R. James sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Lawrence R. James D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Lawrence R. James, a Psychology scholar from Georgia Institute of Technology, records 51 D-Index - the 56th percentile of the discipline.
  • 56% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Lawrence R. James, and about 44% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Lawrence R. James ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Lawrence R. James was affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research work primarily focused on psychology, with a specialization in clinical psychology and applied psychology as notable subfields.

The scientist contributed to key topics within psychology, including:

  • Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Among their documented publications, Lawrence R. James authored the paper titled "To push performance, check the leader's power motive" published in 2020 in the journal Business Horizons.

Frequent collaborators in their research included:

  • Nathan Bennett
  • Terry C. Blum
  • Michael D. McIntyre
  • Charles Glisson
  • Jennifer L. Bowler

Their works were mainly published in Business Horizons, a venue associated with their research output.

Best Publications

  • Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.

    Lawrence R. James;Robert G. Demaree;Gerrit Wolf

  • EVALUATION OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDICES FOR STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS

    Stanley A. Mulaik;Larry R. James;Judith Van Alstine;Nathan Bennett

  • rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement.

    Lawrence R. James;Robert G. Demaree;Gerrit Wolf

  • Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement.

    Lawrence R. James

  • Mediators, Moderators, and Tests for Mediation.

    Lawrence R. James;Jeanne M. Brett

  • Organizational climate: A review of theory and research.

    Lawrence R. James;Allan P. Jones

  • A Tale of Two Methods

    Lawrence R. James;Lawrence R. James;Stanley A. Mulaik;Stanley A. Mulaik;Jeanne M. Brett

  • Psychological climate: Dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions☆

    Allan P. Jones;Lawrence R. James

  • The cross‐level effects of culture and climate in human service teams

    Charles Glisson;Lawrence R. James

  • Building Better Theory: Time and The Specification of When Things Happen

    Terence R. Mitchell;Lawrence R. James

  • Integrating Work Environment Perceptions: Explorations into the Measurement of Meaning

    Lois A. James;Lawrence R. James

  • Organizational and psychological climate: A review of theory and research

    Lawrence R. James;Carol C. Choi;Chia-Huei Emily Ko;Patrick K. McNeil

  • Multilevel Analytical Techniques: Commonalties, Differences, and Continuing Questions.

    Katherine J. Klein;Paul D. Bliese;Steve W. Kozlowski;Fred Dansereau

  • Comment: Organizations Do Not Cognize

    Lawrence R. James;William F. Joyce;John W. Slocum

  • Organizational Culture and Climate: Implications for Services and Interventions Research

    Anthony L. Hemmelgarn;Charles Glisson;Lawrence R. James

  • The Restriction of Variance Hypothesis and Interrater Reliability and Agreement: Are Ratings from Multiple Sources Really Dissimilar?

    James M. Lebreton;Jennifer R. D. Burgess;Robert B. Kaiser;E. Kate Atchley

  • PSYCHOLOGICAL CLIMATE: IMPLICATIONS FROM COGNITIVE SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY AND INTERACTIONAL PSYCHOLOGY

    Lawrence R. James;John J. Hater;Michael J. Gent;John R. Bruni

  • Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis.

    Jennifer M. George;Lawrence R. James

  • Measurement of Personality via Conditional Reasoning

    Lawrence R. James

  • Organizational structure: a review of structural dimensions and their conceptual relationships with individual attitudes and behavior

    Lawrence R. James;Allan P. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

James M. LeBreton
James M. LeBreton Pennsylvania State University
Terence R. Mitchell
Terence R. Mitchell University of Washington
Charles Glisson
Charles Glisson University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Jeanne M. Brett
Jeanne M. Brett Northwestern University
Larry J. Williams
Larry J. Williams Texas Tech University
George W. Joe
George W. Joe Texas Christian University
Michael D. Mumford
Michael D. Mumford University of Oklahoma
Francis J. Yammarino
Francis J. Yammarino Binghamton University
Charles E. Lance
Charles E. Lance University of the Western Cape
John W. Slocum
John W. Slocum Southern Methodist University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to various online degrees and career pathways, especially in counseling, clinical psychology, and mental health services. One of the main considerations for anyone exploring these routes is affordability, as tuition costs can vary significantly between institutions and locations.

Prospective students interested in cost-effective options should explore affordable counseling programs in Berkeley, which are known for their comprehensive curricula and accessible tuition rates. Similarly, those looking for the cheapest counseling degrees in Boston will find several programs tailored to various career ambitions.

If location flexibility is important, evaluating the most affordable counseling degree programs in California can help identify schools that offer both in-person and online formats. For students located in the Midwest, exploring the cheapest counseling programs in Chicago may also provide a pathway to licensure and practical experience.

Whether you plan to become a licensed counselor, school psychologist, or work in mental health services, researching affordable, quality programs ensures you build a strong foundation without overwhelming student debt.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence R. James

Recently Published Articles