World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
34649
World Ranking
5077
National Ranking
2786

Lawrence R. James publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence R. James sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 111 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lawrence R. James D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence R. James sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence R. James was affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research work primarily focused on psychology, with a specialization in clinical psychology and applied psychology as notable subfields.

The scientist contributed to key topics within psychology, including:

  • Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Among their documented publications, Lawrence R. James authored the paper titled "To push performance, check the leader's power motive" published in 2020 in the journal Business Horizons.

Frequent collaborators in their research included:

  • Nathan Bennett
  • Terry C. Blum
  • Michael D. McIntyre
  • Charles Glisson
  • Jennifer L. Bowler

Their works were mainly published in Business Horizons, a venue associated with their research output.

Best Publications

  • Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.

    Lawrence R. James;Robert G. Demaree;Gerrit Wolf

  • EVALUATION OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDICES FOR STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS

    Stanley A. Mulaik;Larry R. James;Judith Van Alstine;Nathan Bennett

  • rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement.

    Lawrence R. James;Robert G. Demaree;Gerrit Wolf

  • Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement.

    Lawrence R. James

  • Mediators, Moderators, and Tests for Mediation.

    Lawrence R. James;Jeanne M. Brett

  • Organizational climate: A review of theory and research.

    Lawrence R. James;Allan P. Jones

  • A Tale of Two Methods

    Lawrence R. James;Lawrence R. James;Stanley A. Mulaik;Stanley A. Mulaik;Jeanne M. Brett

  • Psychological climate: Dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions☆

    Allan P. Jones;Lawrence R. James

  • The cross‐level effects of culture and climate in human service teams

    Charles Glisson;Lawrence R. James

  • Building Better Theory: Time and The Specification of When Things Happen

    Terence R. Mitchell;Lawrence R. James

  • Integrating Work Environment Perceptions: Explorations into the Measurement of Meaning

    Lois A. James;Lawrence R. James

  • Organizational and psychological climate: A review of theory and research

    Lawrence R. James;Carol C. Choi;Chia-Huei Emily Ko;Patrick K. McNeil

  • Multilevel Analytical Techniques: Commonalties, Differences, and Continuing Questions.

    Katherine J. Klein;Paul D. Bliese;Steve W. Kozlowski;Fred Dansereau

  • Comment: Organizations Do Not Cognize

    Lawrence R. James;William F. Joyce;John W. Slocum

  • Organizational Culture and Climate: Implications for Services and Interventions Research

    Anthony L. Hemmelgarn;Charles Glisson;Lawrence R. James

  • The Restriction of Variance Hypothesis and Interrater Reliability and Agreement: Are Ratings from Multiple Sources Really Dissimilar?

    James M. Lebreton;Jennifer R. D. Burgess;Robert B. Kaiser;E. Kate Atchley

  • PSYCHOLOGICAL CLIMATE: IMPLICATIONS FROM COGNITIVE SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY AND INTERACTIONAL PSYCHOLOGY

    Lawrence R. James;John J. Hater;Michael J. Gent;John R. Bruni

  • Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis.

    Jennifer M. George;Lawrence R. James

  • Measurement of Personality via Conditional Reasoning

    Lawrence R. James

  • Organizational structure: a review of structural dimensions and their conceptual relationships with individual attitudes and behavior

    Lawrence R. James;Allan P. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

James M. LeBreton
James M. LeBreton Pennsylvania State University
Terence R. Mitchell
Terence R. Mitchell University of Washington
Charles Glisson
Charles Glisson University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Jeanne M. Brett
Jeanne M. Brett Northwestern University
Larry J. Williams
Larry J. Williams Texas Tech University
George W. Joe
George W. Joe Texas Christian University
Michael D. Mumford
Michael D. Mumford University of Oklahoma
Francis J. Yammarino
Francis J. Yammarino Binghamton University
Charles E. Lance
Charles E. Lance University of the Western Cape
John W. Slocum
John W. Slocum Southern Methodist University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to various online degrees and career pathways, especially in counseling, clinical psychology, and mental health services. One of the main considerations for anyone exploring these routes is affordability, as tuition costs can vary significantly between institutions and locations.

Prospective students interested in cost-effective options should explore affordable counseling programs in Berkeley, which are known for their comprehensive curricula and accessible tuition rates. Similarly, those looking for the cheapest counseling degrees in Boston will find several programs tailored to various career ambitions.

If location flexibility is important, evaluating the most affordable counseling degree programs in California can help identify schools that offer both in-person and online formats. For students located in the Midwest, exploring the cheapest counseling programs in Chicago may also provide a pathway to licensure and practical experience.

Whether you plan to become a licensed counselor, school psychologist, or work in mental health services, researching affordable, quality programs ensures you build a strong foundation without overwhelming student debt.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence R. James

Recently Published Articles