World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
José M. Peiró

José M. Peiró

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 72 2050 1859 17 17 290 20969

José M. Peiró publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by José M. Peiró between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. José M. Peiró published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2014. 14 of the 379 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2014. 1980: 2 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 13 publications
1980 2025

379 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
José M. Peiró: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 2
1981 4
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 2
1991 0
1992 7
1993 2
1994 5
1995 6
1996 3
1997 2
1998 2
1999 8
2000 5
2001 10
2002 10
2003 11
2004 3
2005 19
2006 7
2007 17
2008 16
2009 12
2010 19
2011 19
2012 13
2013 11
2014 22
2015 18
2016 15
2017 6
2018 14
2019 18
2020 18
2021 16
2022 8
2023 13
2024 1
2025 13
Total 379
Download as CSV

José M. Peiró publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José M. Peiró sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 290 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139 290
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

José M. Peiró D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José M. Peiró sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 72
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Aristotle Prize, European Federation of Psychologists' Associations

Overview

José M. Peiró is affiliated with the University of Valencia in Spain and conducts research primarily in the fields of Psychology and Health Professions. The scientist's research emphasizes multiple subfields including Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, and Sociology and Political Science.

The main topics covered in their work reflect a focus on workplace-related issues and individual well-being, including:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Workplace Violence and Bullying

José M. Peiró's recent publications include studies on job performance, career sustainability, and workplace safety, with notable papers such as:

  • Importance of work characteristics affects job performance: The mediating role of individual dispositions on the work design-performance relationships (2020), published in Personality and Individual Differences
  • The lagged influence of organizations' human resources practices on employees' career sustainability: The moderating role of age (2020), published in Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Challenges influencing the safety of migrant workers in the construction industry: A qualitative study in Italy, Spain, and the UK (2021), published in Safety Science
  • Design of a safety training package for migrant workers in the construction industry (2021), published in Safety Science
  • The Relationship between Knowledge Characteristics' Fit and Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement (2020), published in Sustainability

Frequent co-authors in José M. Peiró's publications include Aida Soriano, Amparo Caballer, Núria Tordera, Beatriz Sora, and Annamaria Di Fabio. This reflects collaborative efforts across various research projects within their fields of expertise.

The scientist regularly publishes in a core set of journals, reinforcing their focus and specialization. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
  • Australian Journal of Career Development
  • Sustainability
  • Safety Science
  • Personality and Individual Differences

José M. Peiró received the Aristotle Prize from the European Federation of Psychologists' Associations in 2015, indicating recognition from a professional organization in the field of psychology.

Best Publications

  • Linking Organizational Resources and Work Engagement to Employee Performance and Customer Loyalty: The Mediation of Service Climate.

    Marisa Salanova;Sonia Agut;José María Peiró

  • Desde el "burnout" al "engagement": ¿una nueva perspectiva?

    Marisa Salanova;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Susana Llorens;Jose M. Peiro

  • Perspectivas teóricas y modelos interpretativos para el estudio del síndrome de quemarse por el trabajo

    Pedro R. Gil Monte;José María Peiró

  • An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength.

    Vicente González-Romá;José M. Peiró;Núria Tordera

  • Self-efficacy specificity and burnout among information technology workers: An extension of the job demand-control model

    Marisa Salanova;José M. Peiró;Wilmar B. Schaufeli

  • Job Insecurity and Well-Being: Moderation by Employability

    Inmaculada Silla;Nele De Cuyper;Francisco J. Gracia;Jose Maria Peiro

  • Overqualified Employees: Making the Best of a Potentially Bad Situation for Individuals and Organizations

    Berrin Erdogan;Talya N. Bauer;José María Peiró;Donald M. Truxillo

  • Job characteristics, physical and psychological symptoms, and social support as antecedents of sickness absence among men and women in the private industrial sector.

    Ari Väänänen;Ari Väänänen;Salla Toppinen-Tanner;Raija Kalimo;Pertti Mutanen

  • VALIDEZ FACTORIAL DEL MASLACH BURNOUT INVENTORY EN UNA MUESTRA MULTIOCUPACIONAL

    Pedro R. Gil-Monte;José Mª Peiró

  • MODERATOR EFFECTS OF SELF-EFFICACY ON OCCUPATIONAL STRESS

    Rosa Grau;Marisa Salanova;José María Peiró

  • Justice Perceptions as Predictors of Customer Satisfaction: The Impact of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice1

    Vicente Martínez-Tur;José M. Peiró;José Ramos;Carolina Moliner

  • The influence of intra‐team conflict on work teams' affective climate: A longitudinal study

    Nuria Gamero;Vicente González-Romá;José M. Peiró

  • Organizational justice and extrarole customer service: The mediating role of well-being at work

    Carolina Moliner;Vicente Martínez-Tur;José Ramos;José M. Peiró

  • Team climate, climate strength and team performance. A longitudinal study

    Vicente González-Romá;Lina Fortes-Ferreira;José Maria Peiró

  • The Demands-Control-Support model, locus of control and job dissatisfaction: A longitudinal study

    Isabel Rodríguez;M. Jesús Bravo;José M. Peiró;Wilmar Schaufeli

  • Leadership and employees' perceived safety behaviours in a nuclear power plant: A structural equation model

    Mario Martínez-Córcoles;Francisco Gracia;Inés Tomás;José M. Peiró

  • Relationships Between Organizational Justice and Burnout at the Work-Unit Level.

    Carolina Moliner;Vicente Martínez-Tur;José M. Peiró;José Ramos

  • PATTERNS OF STYLES IN CONFLICT MANAGEMENT AND EFFECTIVENESS

    Lourdes Munduate;Juan Ganaza;José M. Peiró;Martin Euwema

  • Social Comparisons at Work as Related to a Cooperative Social Climate and to Individual Differences in Social Comparison Orientation

    Bram P. Buunk;Rosario Zurriaga;José M. Peíró;Aukje Nauta

  • Do social comparison and coping styles play a role in the development of burnout? Cross‐sectional and longitudinal findings

    Carmen Carmona;Abraham P. Buunk;José M. Peiró;Isabel Rodríguez

Frequent Co-Authors

José Ramos
José Ramos University of Córdoba
Abraham P. Buunk
Abraham P. Buunk University of Groningen
Hans De Witte
Hans De Witte KU Leuven
Marisa Salanova
Marisa Salanova Jaume I University
Arie Dijkstra
Arie Dijkstra University of Groningen
Russell Cropanzano
Russell Cropanzano University of Colorado Boulder
René Schalk
René Schalk Tilburg University
Rolf van Dick
Rolf van Dick Goethe University Frankfurt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to various online programs and specialized career paths, especially in counseling and clinical roles. Many students aim for licensure as a professional counselor (LPC), a requirement for providing mental health services in most states.

Each state has its unique guidelines for becoming an LPC, often involving accredited graduate coursework, supervised clinical hours, and national examinations. For example, those interested in practice in Kansas should review the Kansas licensed professional counselor requirements. Similarly, individuals considering Kentucky should explore the lpc licensure requirements in Kentucky to understand specific state processes.

Professionals looking to work in the South will benefit from reading about the lpc license requirements in Louisiana. Meanwhile, those considering opportunities in the Northeast should familiarize themselves with the lpc license requirements in Maine. Understanding these requirements is essential for a streamlined path from online degree programs to a rewarding career in counseling or clinical psychology.

Best Scientists Citing José M. Peiró

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles