World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
82
Citations
43380
World Ranking
1448
National Ranking
680

Michael F. Thomashow publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael F. Thomashow sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 138 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Michael F. Thomashow D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael F. Thomashow sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Society of Plant Biologists
  • 2003 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Michael F. Thomashow is a researcher affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Within these fields, their focus includes Plant Science and Molecular Biology, addressing questions relevant to plant molecular biology research and physiological responses to environmental stimuli.

Their research topics include:

  • Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Light effects on plants
  • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Thomashow has contributed to research on plant responses to environmental stresses such as freezing tolerance. Notable publications by Thomashow include:

  • Cold-Induced CBF-PIF3 Interaction Enhances Freezing Tolerance by Stabilizing the phyB Thermosensor in Arabidopsis, 2020, Molecular Plant
  • SCREAMing Twist on the Role of ICE1 in Freezing Tolerance, 2020, The Plant Cell
  • Temperature modulation of CAMTA3 gene induction activity is mediated through the DNA binding domain, 2022, The Plant Journal

Thomashow has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Bochen Jiang, Yiting Shi, Yue Peng, Yuxin Jia, and Yan Yan.

Their work has been published in notable venues such as Molecular Plant, The Plant Cell, and The Plant Journal, reflecting a range of contributions to plant biology literature.

The scientist has been recognized with several awards including:

  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2010
  • Fellow of the American Society of Plant Biologists, 2009
  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003

Best Publications

  • Plant cold acclimation: Freezing tolerance genes and regulatory mechanisms

    Michael F. Thomashow

  • Arabidopsis thaliana CBF1 encodes an AP2 domain-containing transcriptional activator that binds to the C-repeat/DRE, a cis-acting DNA regulatory element that stimulates transcription in response to low temperature and water deficit

    Eric J. Stockinger;Sarah J. Gilmour;Michael F. Thomashow

  • Arabidopsis CBF1 overexpression induces COR genes and enhances freezing tolerance.

    Kirsten R. Jaglo-Ottosen;Sarah J. Gilmour;Daniel G. Zarka;Oliver Schabenberger

  • Arabidopsis Transcriptome Profiling Indicates That Multiple Regulatory Pathways Are Activated during Cold Acclimation in Addition to the CBF Cold Response Pathway

    Sarah Fowler;Michael F. Thomashow

  • Low temperature regulation of the Arabidopsis CBF family of AP2 transcriptional activators as an early step in cold-induced COR gene expression

    Sarah J. Gilmour;Daniel G. Zarka;Eric J. Stockinger;Maite P. Salazar

  • Overexpression of the Arabidopsis CBF3 transcriptional activator mimics multiple biochemical changes associated with cold acclimation

    Sarah J. Gilmour;Audrey M. Sebolt;Maite P. Salazar;John D. Everard

  • The 5'-region of Arabidopsis thaliana cor15a has cis-acting elements that confer cold-, drought- and ABA-regulated gene expression.

    Stokes S. Baker;Kathy S. Wilhelm;Michael F. Thomashow

  • Transcription Factor CBF4 Is a Regulator of Drought Adaptation in Arabidopsis

    Volker Haake;Daniel Cook;José Luis Riechmann;Omaira Pineda

  • Role of Cold-Responsive Genes in Plant Freezing Tolerance

    Michael F. Thomashow

  • Components of the Arabidopsis C-repeat/dehydration-responsive element binding factor cold-response pathway are conserved in Brassica napus and other plant species.

    Kirsten R. Jaglo;Susanne Kleff;Keenan L. Amundsen;Xin Zhang

  • Roles of the CBF2 and ZAT12 transcription factors in configuring the low temperature transcriptome of Arabidopsis.

    Jonathan T. Vogel;Daniel G. Zarka;Heather A. Van Buskirk;Sarah G. Fowler

  • Plant hormone jasmonate prioritizes defense over growth by interfering with gibberellin signaling cascade

    Dong Lei Yang;Jian Yao;Chuan Sheng Mei;Xiao Hong Tong

  • So What's New in the Field of Plant Cold Acclimation? Lots!

    Michael F. Thomashow

  • A prominent role for the CBF cold response pathway in configuring the low-temperature metabolome of Arabidopsis

    Daniel Cook;Sarah Fowler;Oliver Fiehn;Michael F. Thomashow

  • Genes Galore: A Summary of Methods for Accessing Results from Large-Scale Partial Sequencing of Anonymous Arabidopsis cDNA Clones

    T. Newman;F. J. de Bruijn;P. Green;K. Keegstra

  • Molecular basis of plant cold acclimation: insights gained from studying the CBF cold response pathway.

    Michael F. Thomashow

  • Roles for Arabidopsis CAMTA transcription factors in cold-regulated gene expression and freezing tolerance.

    Colleen J. Doherty;Heather A. Van Buskirk;Susan J. Myers;Michael F. Thomashow

  • Arabidopsis transcriptional activators CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3 have matching functional activities.

    Sarah J. Gilmour;Sarah G. Fowler;Michael F. Thomashow

  • Constitutive expression of the cold-regulated Arabidopsis thaliana COR15a gene affects both chloroplast and protoplast freezing tolerance

    Nancy N. Artus;Matsuo Uemura;Peter L. Steponkus;Sarah J. Gilmour

  • Mode of action of the COR15a gene on the freezing tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana.

    Peter L. Steponkus;Matsuo Uemura;Raymond A. Joseph;Sarah J. Gilmour

Frequent Co-Authors

James M. Tiedje
James M. Tiedje Michigan State University
Tony H. H. Chen
Tony H. H. Chen Oregon State University
Patrick M. Hayes
Patrick M. Hayes Oregon State University
Cai-Zhong Jiang
Cai-Zhong Jiang University of California, Davis
Matsuo Uemura
Matsuo Uemura Iwate University
Peter L. Steponkus
Peter L. Steponkus Cornell University
Eugene W. Nester
Eugene W. Nester University of Washington
Shin-Han Shiu
Shin-Han Shiu Michigan State University
Milton P. Gordon
Milton P. Gordon University of Washington
Chentao Lin
Chentao Lin University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore opportunities in Genetics, it’s helpful to consider related online degrees and flexible career pathways in the health sciences. Many students look to programs such as accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid for roles that are in-demand and can complement genetics knowledge. These options offer career stability and a solid foundation in healthcare systems.

For those seeking to accelerate their career trajectory, fast track college programs can be a smart choice. These programs are designed to help you earn a respected degree in a shorter time frame, making it easier to quickly enter the workforce or advance your current position.

Flexibility is also available through accredited self-paced online colleges, allowing you to study genetics or related subjects on a schedule that fits your needs. Many institutions also remove barriers by offering a free online college application, making it easier and more affordable to start your educational journey.

Best Scientists Citing Michael F. Thomashow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles