World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 17220 16183 8630 7976 377 21067

Hardeep Singh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hardeep Singh between 1976 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hardeep Singh published across 51 years, from 1976 to 2026, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 58 publications in 2024. 25 of the 551 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 58. Peak 58 publications in 2024. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 32 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 32 publications 2019: 50 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 39 publications 2022: 44 publications 2023: 40 publications 2024: 58 publications 2025: 23 publications 2026: 2 publications
1976 2026

551 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hardeep Singh: publications per year, 1976 to 2026
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 2
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 2
2001 0
2002 1
2003 4
2004 1
2005 2
2006 2
2007 6
2008 3
2009 11
2010 16
2011 12
2012 18
2013 24
2014 30
2015 32
2016 31
2017 31
2018 32
2019 50
2020 34
2021 39
2022 44
2023 40
2024 58
2025 23
2026 2
Total 551
Download as CSV

Hardeep Singh publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hardeep Singh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 377 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 377
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Hardeep Singh D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hardeep Singh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Hardeep Singh is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their work encompasses a broad range of topics primarily related to clinical reasoning, diagnostic skills, patient safety, and health information management.

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on diagnostic accuracy, clinical uncertainties, and the integration of technology in healthcare. Notable papers include:

  • Factors Associated With Potentially Missed Diagnosis of Appendicitis in the Emergency Department, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Patient and Clinician Experiences of Uncertainty in the Diagnostic Process: Current Understanding and Future Directions, 2021, Patient Education and Counseling
  • COVID-19 and the Need for a National Health Information Technology Infrastructure, 2020, JAMA
  • Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Diagnosis, 2023, JAMA
  • Building the Evidence-Base to Reduce Electronic Health Record-Related Clinician Burden, 2020, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Hardeep Singh include:

  • Dean F. Sittig
  • Traber Davis Giardina
  • Prashant Mahajan
  • Christina L. Cifra
  • Andrew J. Zimolzak

The venues most often publishing their work are:

  • Diagnosis
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • JAMA Network Open
  • JAMA
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Main fields of study covered by their research include Medicine and Health Professions, with subfields that highlight specific focus areas such as Family Practice, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Information Management, and Oncology.

Key topics addressed in their research are:

  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Healthcare Cost, Quality, Practices
  • Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Radiology Practices and Education

Best Publications

  • Missed and delayed diagnosis of dementia in primary care: prevalence and contributing factors.

    Andrea Bradford;Mark E. Kunik;Paul Schulz;Susan P. Williams

  • The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations

    Hardeep Singh;Ashley N D Meyer;Eric J Thomas

  • Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings.

    Hardeep Singh;Traber Davis Giardina;Ashley N. D. Meyer;Samuel N. Forjuoh

  • Medical errors involving trainees: a study of closed malpractice claims from 5 insurers.

    Hardeep Singh;Eric J. Thomas;Laura A. Petersen;David M. Studdert

  • Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review

    Mark L Graber;Stephanie Kissam;Velma L Payne;Ashley N D Meyer

  • The global burden of diagnostic errors in primary care

    Hardeep Singh;Gordon D Schiff;Mark L Graber;Mark L Graber;Igho Onakpoya

  • Two Decades Since To Err Is Human: An Assessment Of Progress And Emerging Priorities In Patient Safety.

    David W. Bates;Hardeep Singh

  • 6-thioguanine can cause serious liver injury in inflammatory bowel disease patients

    Marla C Dubinsky;Eric A Vasiliauskas;Hardeep Singh;Maria T Abreu

  • Electronic health records and national patient-safety goals.

    Dean F. Sittig;Hardeep Singh;Hardeep Singh

  • Physicians’ Diagnostic Accuracy, Confidence, and Resource Requests: A Vignette Study

    Ashley N. D. Meyer;Velma L. Payne;Velma L. Payne;Derek W. Meeks;Derek W. Meeks;Radha Rao;Radha Rao

  • Timely Follow-Up of Abnormal Diagnostic Imaging Test Results in an Outpatient Setting: Are Electronic Medical Records Achieving Their Potential?

    Hardeep Singh;Eric J. Thomas;Shrinidi Mani;Shrinidi Mani;Dean Sittig

  • An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns.

    Derek W Meeks;Derek W Meeks;Michael W Smith;Michael W Smith;Lesley Taylor;Dean F Sittig

  • Information Overload and Missed Test Results in Electronic Health Record–Based Settings

    Hardeep Singh;Hardeep Singh;Christiane Spitzmueller;Nancy J. Petersen;Nancy J. Petersen;Mona K. Sawhney;Mona K. Sawhney

  • Defining Health Information Technology–Related Errors: New Developments Since To Err Is Human

    Dean F. Sittig;Hardeep Singh

  • Defining and Measuring Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicine: A Systematic Review

    Viraj Bhise;Viraj Bhise;Suja S Rajan;Dean F Sittig;Robert O Morgan

  • Notification of Abnormal Lab Test Results in an Electronic Medical Record: Do Any Safety Concerns Remain?

    Hardeep Singh;Eric J. Thomas;Dean F. Sittig;Lindsey Wilson

  • Understanding diagnostic errors in medicine: a lesson from aviation

    H. Singh;L. A. Petersen;Eric Thomas

  • Reducing diagnostic errors through effective communication: harnessing the power of information technology.

    Hardeep Singh;Hardeep Singh;Aanand Dinkar Naik;Aanand Dinkar Naik;Raghuram Rao;Laura Ann Petersen;Laura Ann Petersen

  • Patient access to medical records and healthcare outcomes: a systematic review

    Traber Davis Giardina;Traber Davis Giardina;Shailaja Menon;Danielle E Parrish;Dean F Sittig

  • Medical errors involving trainees : A study of closed malpractice claims from 5 insurers. Commentaries

    Robert A. Phillips;Julia D. Andrieni;Hardeep Singh;Eric J. Thomas

Frequent Co-Authors

Dean F. Sittig
Dean F. Sittig The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Hashem B. El-Serag
Hashem B. El-Serag Baylor College of Medicine
Adam Wright
Adam Wright Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Moonseong Heo
Moonseong Heo Clemson University
Stephen Campbell
Stephen Campbell University of Manchester
David W. Bates
David W. Bates Brigham and Women's Hospital
David M. Studdert
David M. Studdert Stanford University
Mark E. Kunik
Mark E. Kunik Baylor College of Medicine
Fasiha Kanwal
Fasiha Kanwal Baylor College of Medicine
Melinda A. Stanley
Melinda A. Stanley Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternatives to traditional medical degrees can open doors to numerous rewarding healthcare careers. Many students are now considering online programs that offer flexibility and affordability, making them an attractive option for working professionals or those with busy schedules.

One popular choice is nursing, where numerous cheapest nurse practitioner programs give students the chance to advance their clinical expertise without breaking the bank. For those just starting out or looking to move into nursing, there are highly regarded affordable online nursing programs that offer quality education at lower costs.

If you already have an RN license, progressing to a bachelor’s degree can be cost-effective through the cheapest rn to bsn online programs. Furthermore, nurses aiming for leadership, teaching, or scholarly roles can consider online phd programs nursing, which balance advanced study with personal and professional commitments.

These flexible online paths help students and professionals take the next step in their healthcare journey while making education more accessible and affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Hardeep Singh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles