World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
6240
World Ranking
9784
National Ranking
300

Farah Magrabi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Farah Magrabi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 128 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Farah Magrabi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Farah Magrabi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Farah Magrabi is affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with a particular focus on Health Informatics, Health Information Management, Artificial Intelligence, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Epidemiology.

Their work covers a range of topics in health and technology, notably:

  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Quality and Safety in Healthcare
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Farah Magrabi has published regularly in several venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • BMJ Health & Care Informatics

Recent papers include:

  • "Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI," 2022, Nature Medicine
  • "Impacts of Healthcare 4.0 digital technologies on the resilience of hospitals," 2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • "How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices," 2021, BMJ Health & Care Informatics
  • "More than algorithms: an analysis of safety events involving ML-enabled medical devices reported to the FDA," 2023, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • "Automation in nursing decision support systems: A systematic review of effects on decision making, care delivery, and patient outcomes," 2021, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Enrico Coiera
  • David Lyell
  • Ying Wang
  • Kathrin Cresswell
  • Andrew Georgiou

Best Publications

  • Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review.

    Liliana Laranjo;Adam G. Dunn;Huong Ly Tong;Ahmet Baki Kocaballi

  • Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support: Challenges for Evaluating AI and Practical Implications

    Farah Magrabi;Elske Ammenwerth;Jytte Brender McNair;Nicolet F. De Keizer

  • Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

    Mi Ok Kim;Enrico W. Coiera;Farah Magrabi

  • A systematic review of the psychological literature on interruption and its patient safety implications.

    Simon Y. W. Li;Farah Magrabi;Enrico W. Coiera

  • Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems.

    Farah Magrabi;Mei-Sing Ong;William Runciman;William Runciman;Enrico W. Coiera

  • Safety concerns with consumer-facing mobile health applications and their consequences: a scoping review.

    Saba Akbar;Enrico W. Coiera;Farah Magrabi

  • The impact of clinical leadership on health information technology adoption: Systematic review

    Tor Ingebrigtsen;Tor Ingebrigtsen;Tor Ingebrigtsen;Andrew Georgiou;Robyn Clay-Williams;Farah Magrabi

  • An analysis of computer-related patient safety incidents to inform the development of a classification

    Farah Magrabi;Mei-Sing Ong;William Runciman;William Runciman;Enrico W. Coiera

  • Current challenges in health information technology-related patient safety.

    Dean F. Sittig;Adam Wright;Enrico W. Coiera;Farah Magrabi

  • General practitioners’ use of online evidence during consultations

    Farah Magrabi;Enrico W. Coiera;Johanna I. Westbrook;A. Sophie Gosling

  • Impacts of Healthcare 4.0 digital technologies on the resilience of hospitals

    Guilherme Luz Tortorella;Guilherme Luz Tortorella;Tarcísio Abreu Saurin;Flavio S. Fogliatto;Valentina M. Rosa

  • Clinical safety of England's national programme for IT : a retrospective analysis of all reported safety events 2005 to 2011

    Farah Magrabi;Maureen Baker;Ipsita Sinha;Mei-Sing Ong

  • A web-based approach for electrocardiogram monitoring in the home

    Farah Magrabi;Nigel H. Lovell;Branko G. Celler

  • A comparative review of patient safety initiatives for national health information technology

    Farah Magrabi;Jos Aarts;Christian Nøhr;Maureen Baker

  • Does health informatics have a replication crisis

    Enrico W. Coiera;Elske Ammenwerth;Andrew Georgiou;Farah Magrabi

  • Impact of a web-based personally controlled health management system on influenza vaccination and health services utilization rates: a randomized controlled trial.

    Annie Y. S. Lau;Vitali Sintchenko;Vitali Sintchenko;Vitali Sintchenko;Jacinta Crimmins;Farah Magrabi

  • Errors and electronic prescribing: a controlled laboratory study to examine task complexity and interruption effects

    Farah Magrabi;Simon Y. W. Li;Richard O. Day;Enrico W. Coiera

  • How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices.

    David Lyell;Enrico Coiera;Jessica Chen;Parina Shah

  • Web-based acquisition, storage, and retrieval of biomedical signals

    N.H. Lovell;F. Magrabi;B.G. Celler;K. Huynh

  • Automation bias in electronic prescribing.

    David Lyell;Farah Magrabi;Magdalena Z. Raban;Lisa G. Pont

  • Using statistical text classification to identify health information technology incidents.

    Kevin E. K. Chai;Stephen Anthony;Enrico W. Coiera;Farah Magrabi

  • Automated categorisation of clinical incident reports using statistical text classification

    Mei Sing Ong;Farah Magrabi;Enrico Coiera

Frequent Co-Authors

Enrico Coiera
Enrico Coiera Macquarie University
Nigel H. Lovell
Nigel H. Lovell University of New South Wales
Andrew Georgiou
Andrew Georgiou Macquarie University
Branko G. Celler
Branko G. Celler University of New South Wales
Johanna I. Westbrook
Johanna I. Westbrook Macquarie University
Elske Ammenwerth
Elske Ammenwerth UMIT Tirol - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology
Vitali Sintchenko
Vitali Sintchenko University of Sydney
Dean F. Sittig
Dean F. Sittig The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Richard O. Day
Richard O. Day University of New South Wales
Charlene R. Weir
Charlene R. Weir University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Computer Science often means exploring related fields and flexible degree options. For those interested in broadening their expertise, Electrical Engineering is a highly relevant area. Comparing electrical engineering online tuition costs can help you find affordable programs that fit your goals.

If you’re looking to enter the workforce quickly, there are many short certificate programs that pay well, offering practical skills and job opportunities within months. These certifications often provide a fast track into growing fields within tech and IT.

Graduates seeking advanced credentials without spending years in school can also consider the shortest masters degree programs online. Many universities offer accelerated master’s programs in computing and engineering disciplines completed in a year or less.

Choosing the right next step is important. Explore the best masters degree to get if you want to maximize career advancement, salary potential, and job market demand.

Best Scientists Citing Farah Magrabi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles