World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
78
Citations
22584
World Ranking
604
National Ranking
45

Enrico Coiera publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrico Coiera sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 318 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Enrico Coiera D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrico Coiera sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science

Overview

Enrico Coiera is affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with significant contributions in subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, General Health Professions, Health Informatics, Health Information Management, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work broadly focuses on topics including Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education, Electronic Health Records Systems, Machine Learning in Healthcare, Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, COVID-19 diagnosis using AI, Ethics in Clinical Research, and the Ethics and Social Impacts of AI.

Their recent publications include:

  • "Do smartphone applications and activity trackers increase physical activity in adults? Systematic review, meta-analysis and metaregression" (2020, British Journal of Sports Medicine)
  • "Evaluation framework to guide implementation of AI systems into healthcare settings" (2021, BMJ Health & Care Informatics)
  • "Exploring stakeholder attitudes towards AI in clinical practice" (2021, BMJ Health & Care Informatics)
  • "Clinician checklist for assessing suitability of machine learning applications in healthcare" (2021, BMJ Health & Care Informatics)
  • "Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status prediction in histopathology images of gliomas using deep learning" (2020, Scientific Reports)

Frequent coauthors in their research include Shlomo Berkovsky, Farah Magrabi, Juan C. Quiroz, Dana Rezazadegan, and Liliana Laranjo.

They commonly publish in venues such as:

  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • BMJ Health & Care Informatics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Scientific Reports

Enrico Coiera has been recognized as a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science since 2018.

Best Publications

  • Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors

    Joan S. Ash;Marc Berg;Enrico W. Coiera

  • Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review.

    Liliana Laranjo;Adam G. Dunn;Huong Ly Tong;Ahmet Baki Kocaballi

  • Gene cassettes and cassette arrays in mobile resistance integrons.

    Sally R. Partridge;Guy Tsafnat;Enrico Coiera;Jonathan R. Iredell

  • When Conversation Is Better than Computation

    Enrico W. Coiera

  • Systematic review automation technologies

    Guy Tsafnat;Paul Glasziou;Miew Keen Choong;Adam Dunn

  • Guide to Health Informatics

    Enrico Coiera

  • The impact of interruptions on clinical task completion

    Johanna I Westbrook;Enrico Coiera;William T M Dunsmuir;Bruce M Brown

  • Guide to Medical Informatics, the Internet and Telemedicine

    Enrico Coiera

  • Do smartphone applications and activity trackers increase physical activity in adults?: Systematic review, meta-analysis and metaregression

    Liliana Laranjo;Ding Ding;Bruno Heleno;Baki Kocaballi;Baki Kocaballi

  • Improving clinical communication: a view from psychology.

    Julie Parker;Enrico W. Coiera

  • Mapping information exposure on social media to explain differences in HPV vaccine coverage in the United States.

    Adam G. Dunn;Didi Surian;Julie Leask;Aditi Dey

  • Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

    Mi Ok Kim;Enrico W. Coiera;Farah Magrabi

  • The Personalization of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review.

    Ahmet Baki Kocaballi;Shlomo Berkovsky;Juan C Quiroz;Liliana Laranjo

  • Automation bias and verification complexity: a systematic review.

    David Lyell;Enrico W. Coiera

  • A systematic review of failures in handoff communication during intrahospital transfers.

    Mei-Sing Ong;M. BiomedE;Enrico Coiera

  • Multimethod evaluation of information and communication technologies in health in the context of wicked problems and sociotechnical theory.

    Johanna I. Westbrook;Jeffrey Braithwaite;Andrew Georgiou;Amanda Ampt

  • A systematic review of the psychological literature on interruption and its patient safety implications.

    Simon Y. W. Li;Farah Magrabi;Enrico W. Coiera

  • Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems.

    Farah Magrabi;Mei-Sing Ong;William Runciman;William Runciman;Enrico W. Coiera

  • Do Online Information Retrieval Systems Help Experienced Clinicians Answer Clinical Questions

    Johanna I. Westbrook;Enrico W. Coiera;A. Sophie Gosling

  • Safety concerns with consumer-facing mobile health applications and their consequences: a scoping review.

    Saba Akbar;Enrico W. Coiera;Farah Magrabi

  • The Internet's challenge to health care provision.

    Enrico Coiera

  • Interruptive communication patterns in the intensive care unit ward round.

    George Alvarez;Enrico W. Coiera

  • Communication Systems in Healthcare

    Enrico Coiera

Frequent Co-Authors

Farah Magrabi
Farah Magrabi Macquarie University
Vitali Sintchenko
Vitali Sintchenko University of Sydney
Johanna I. Westbrook
Johanna I. Westbrook Macquarie University
Kenneth D. Mandl
Kenneth D. Mandl Harvard Medical School
Richard O. Day
Richard O. Day University of New South Wales
Jeffrey Braithwaite
Jeffrey Braithwaite Macquarie University
Shlomo Berkovsky
Shlomo Berkovsky Macquarie University
Gwendolyn L. Gilbert
Gwendolyn L. Gilbert University of Sydney
Jonathan R. Iredell
Jonathan R. Iredell University of Sydney
Julie Leask
Julie Leask University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Enrico Coiera

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles