World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 89 12817 12062 6550 6057 389 25102

Kenneth D. Mandl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kenneth D. Mandl between 1950 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kenneth D. Mandl published across 76 years, from 1950 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2020. 41 of the 453 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1950 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2020. 1950: 2 publications 1951: 2 publications 1952: 0 publications 1953: 0 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 19 publications
1950 2025

453 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kenneth D. Mandl: publications per year, 1950 to 2025
Year Publications
1950 2
1951 2
1952 0
1953 0
1954 0
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 12
1999 10
2000 9
2001 3
2002 13
2003 8
2004 10
2005 13
2006 17
2007 17
2008 13
2009 13
2010 8
2011 13
2012 18
2013 17
2014 18
2015 16
2016 22
2017 25
2018 13
2019 21
2020 37
2021 21
2022 13
2023 24
2024 22
2025 19
Total 453
Download as CSV

Kenneth D. Mandl publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth D. Mandl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 389 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 389
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Kenneth D. Mandl D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth D. Mandl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 89
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kenneth D. Mandl is affiliated with Harvard Medical School in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with a substantial body of work in subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Health Information Management, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Health Informatics. The main topics covered in their research include Machine Learning in Healthcare, Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education, Electronic Health Records Systems, Ethics in Clinical Research, Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, and COVID-19 diagnosis using AI.

The scientist has contributed to multiple publication venues, frequently publishing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • npj Digital Medicine
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Kenneth D. Mandl include:

  • "Digitizing clinical trials," 2020, npj Digital Medicine
  • "Machine intelligence in healthcare-perspectives on trustworthiness, explainability, usability, and transparency," 2020, npj Digital Medicine
  • "The role of absolute humidity on transmission rates of the COVID-19 outbreak," 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Early Transmissibility Assessment of a Novel Coronavirus in Wuhan, China," 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Early in the epidemic: impact of preprints on global discourse about COVID-19 transmissibility," 2020, The Lancet Global Health

Kenneth D. Mandl often collaborates with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Alon Geva
  • Paul Avillach
  • Tianxi Cai
  • Daniel Gottlieb
  • David A. Hanauer

Their research addresses complex issues at the intersection of clinical data and technology, with a significant focus on the integration of artificial intelligence within healthcare systems. This includes efforts to improve trustworthiness, explainability, and usability of machine learning models in clinical settings, as well as the use of health data for epidemiological studies and public health interventions.

Best Publications

  • SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records

    Joshua C. Mandel;Joshua C. Mandel;David A. Kreda;Kenneth D. Mandl;Isaac S. Kohane

  • HealthMap: global infectious disease monitoring through automated classification and visualization of Internet media reports.

    Clark C. Freifeld;Kenneth D. Mandl;Kenneth D. Mandl;Kenneth D. Mandl;Ben Y. Reis;Ben Y. Reis;Ben Y. Reis;John S. Brownstein;John S. Brownstein;John S. Brownstein

  • Implementing Syndromic Surveillance: A Practical Guide Informed by the Early Experience

    Kenneth D. Mandl;J. Marc Overhage;Michael M. Wagner;William B. Lober

  • Surveillance Sans Frontières: Internet-based emerging infectious disease intelligence and the HealthMap project.

    John S Brownstein;Clark C Freifeld;Ben Y Reis;Kenneth D Mandl

  • Early Experiences with Personal Health Records

    John D. Halamka;Kenneth D. Mandl;Paul C. Tang

  • Public standards and patients' control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private.

    Kenneth D Mandl;Peter Szolovits;Isaac S Kohane

  • Finding the missing link for big biomedical data.

    Griffin M. Weber;Griffin M. Weber;Kenneth D. Mandl;Kenneth D. Mandl;Isaac S. Kohane;Isaac S. Kohane

  • Availability and quality of mobile health app privacy policies

    Ali Sunyaev;Tobias Dehling;Patrick L Taylor;Kenneth D Mandl

  • Adverse Drug Events in the Outpatient Setting: An 11-Year National Analysis

    Florence Tanya Bourgeois;Michael W. Shannon;Michael W. Shannon;Clarissa Valim;Kenneth David Mandl;Kenneth David Mandl

  • Ultrasonography and limited computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis in children.

    Barbara M. Garcia Peña;Kenneth D. Mandl;Steven J. Kraus;Anne C. Fischer

  • Electronic Patient-Physician Communication: Problems and Promise

    Kenneth David Mandl;Isaac Samuel Kohane;Allan M. Brandt

  • Time series modeling for syndromic surveillance.

    Ben Y. Reis;Kenneth David Mandl

  • Outcome Reporting Among Drug Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov

    Florence T. Bourgeois;Srinivas Murthy;Kenneth D. Mandl

  • Empirical Evidence for the Effect of Airline Travel on Inter-Regional Influenza Spread in the United States

    John S Brownstein;Cecily J Wolfe;Cecily J Wolfe;Kenneth D Mandl;Kenneth D Mandl;Kenneth D Mandl

  • Digitizing clinical trials.

    O. T. Inan;P. Tenaerts;S. A. Prindiville;H. R. Reynolds

  • Large-Scale Validation of the Centor and McIsaac Scores to Predict Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis

    Andrew M. Fine;Victor Nizet;Kenneth D. Mandl

  • Inpatient Growth and Resource Use in 28 Children's Hospitals: A Longitudinal, Multi-institutional Study

    Jay G. Berry;Matt Hall;David E. Hall;Dennis Z. Kuo

  • Associations Between Exposure to and Expression of Negative Opinions About Human Papillomavirus Vaccines on Social Media: An Observational Study

    Adam G Dunn;Julie Leask;Xujuan Zhou;Kenneth D Mandl

  • Mapping information exposure on social media to explain differences in HPV vaccine coverage in the United States.

    Adam G. Dunn;Didi Surian;Julie Leask;Aditi Dey

  • Developing and adopting safe and effective digital biomarkers to improve patient outcomes

    Andrea Coravos;Sean Khozin;Kenneth D. Mandl

Frequent Co-Authors

Isaac S. Kohane
Isaac S. Kohane Harvard University
John S. Brownstein
John S. Brownstein Boston Children's Hospital
Elissa R. Weitzman
Elissa R. Weitzman Boston Children's Hospital
Enrico Coiera
Enrico Coiera Macquarie University
Donald A. Goldmann
Donald A. Goldmann Boston Children's Hospital
Daniel J. Gottlieb
Daniel J. Gottlieb Brigham and Women's Hospital
Gilbert S. Omenn
Gilbert S. Omenn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Victor Nizet
Victor Nizet University of California, San Diego
Joel N. Hirschhorn
Joel N. Hirschhorn Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens the door to a wide range of related careers. If you’re interested in healthcare but want flexible study options, affordable online programs can help you achieve your goals. Many students begin by researching cheap online fnp programs to become Family Nurse Practitioners (FNPs). These paths allow for advanced clinical roles while balancing other commitments.

Cost is a major consideration for online nursing degrees. It’s helpful to compare different schools to understand how much is online nursing school and identify programs that fit your budget. For those seeking advanced research or academic positions, several institutions offer online phd nursing programs that prepare graduates for leadership and teaching roles.

Many registered nurses are also choosing to advance their credentials through rn to bsn online programs. These flexible degrees help nurses access more opportunities and higher pay. As online education expands, exploring these pathways can lead to fulfilling healthcare careers without traditional barriers.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth D. Mandl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles